About 9 years ago? I loved that guy...he and Pico used to have major disagreements over the nature of alignment vs. the nature of Chaos. Pico argued that a character's alignment sort of 'filtered' a character's chaotic actions toward a polar end (ie, a chaotic good character's actions would unpredictably cause 'good' things to happen). The Philosopher argued that Chaos was an 'absolute defense' of sorts, that overruled alignment and should cause a character to act completely unpredictably. It really bugs me I can only remember his title, and not his name. I think it started with a "K."