Go back to previous topic
Forum Name The Battlefield
Topic subject(DELETED) [None] Shadrist the Legend of the Battlefield
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=82791
82791, (DELETED) [None] Shadrist the Legend of the Battlefield
Posted by Death_Angel on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sat Jul 11 17:34:43 2009

At 10 o'clock PM, Day of the Sun, 34th of the Month of the Great Evil
on the Theran calendar Shadrist perished, never to return.
Race:storm
Class:warrior
Level:51
Alignment:Good
Ethos:Orderly
Cabal:None, None
Age:186
Hours:97
82813, RE: (DELETED) [None] Shadrist the Legend of the Battlefield
Posted by Humbert. on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Definitely competent, though you really shouldn't have signalled your past char by referring to two certain chars you played... I was hoping you'd reproduce the success of storm sword, though I knew it wouldn't be as powerful as the previous characters you played (Aganthas, Ilvakihj, Ajirkahn) it most certainly has more kill-sealing ability.

Tip: It'd be helpful if you fix the strong-headed take-charge attitude (literally all of the Forties noticed it). If you are a powerhouse, people will know, you don't need to act like you're the boss (especially in a cabal with a chain of command), unless of course you really -are- the Marshall or Captain.
83037, RE: (DELETED) [None] Shadrist the Legend of the Battlefield
Posted by Shadrist on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Fortress... is just... full of too many newbies that get me and the tactics I have put to utter ####. Honestly, I cringed when I had to team up with more then half of them. You, Arrna, Tialan, and Lornakanmas were the only folk I considered actually competent in there department. It was a build capable of repelling Ahtieli and big guys like Gzurweeg, also... my first real sword hero. Other character of mine was Shijjakru.
82804, I enjoyed our ideological talks /stxt
Posted by Artenno on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I failed to seduce you in any way with the dark side. Thanks for playing along and good luck with your next!
82793, I'm really sorry things had to go that way....
Posted by Arrna on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
... But I suppose we both has to stick to our roles. You really seemed to know your stuff. And I was hoping that your attitude was all your role. I know it sucks getting uninducted, but if nothing else, it opens up a bunch of RP opportunities.

Well, good luck with your next though!
83040, RE: I'm really sorry things had to go that way....
Posted by Shadrist on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Meh... I just don't see the RP reasoning behind backing protection of corrupt magistrates when all the PC leaders are evil and the head PC is a Mummy. That and well, working with newbs constantly who just make mistakes too frequently or aren't fast enough is a pet peeve. I guess that makes me a bad person.
83042, RE: I'm really sorry things had to go that way....
Posted by Fortress Newb on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Here's some advice for you. When you act like an ass, people treat you like an ass. Blaming them for that is silly.

I laughed at your 'aren't fast enough' comment. We didn't interact a lot but by the end I cringed when you'd log in. You'd bark orders at me to do stuff that I was already doing, or that wasn't actually possible, so many times that and I'd just stop everything and count to 10 just to see if I could annoy you.

I didn't hold it against you cause I figured that was your role. Ah well.

Anyway, good luck on your next.
83043, Off topic. Why the #### are nearly all guards good aligned? ntnt
Posted by CD on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
ntnt