>Is that for being, mechanically speaking, the most powerhouse
>character possible you sure are paranoid.
>
>I have a good idea of who you are, and your characters always
>roll that way.

First time I hear it about my chars.

>Maybe some people get more upset about it because you are
>emperor lich.

They do.

>I know I'm sensitive about -any- ultra
>conservative character. In either event, we're allowed out
>opinions.
If I was ultra conservative, I would NEVER died in pk. Lich/emperor powers allow you to do it.

>Additionally, I'm not begrudging you your use of centurions. I
>would do the same thing. All I'm saying is that you seem to be
>really heavy on that particular tactic, perhaps to the
>exclusion of more straightforward play that we've seen from
>other, more bad ass liches.

1. Centurions gave me like 3-5% of kills, wtf are you talking about when you are saying that I really heavy on that tactic???
2. Bad ass liches in past? Can you understand it is stupid to compare liches of past with currient one? Power of liches greatly depends on phylacteries. In past it was in 10 times more easy to get a good phylactery set.

>My point in talking about your statistics was that your kills
>were while out fighting, not by waiting around behind
>centurions or locked in rooms in Balator, and that maybe you
>should do more of 1 and less of 2.
Go and read again all what I've wrote about this tactic. In a short, in general I used centurions for:

1. Killing ragers. Oh no wait, I should just go attack them and let them run.
2. Separating big group of enemies. Oh! Mistake I should go and fight massive gang on thier own rules.