Go
back to previous topic |
Forum Name |
The Battlefield | Topic subject | (AUTO) Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of the Dawn | Topic
URL | https://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=494 |
494, (AUTO) Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of the Dawn
Posted by Death_Angel on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sat Mar 24 2:30:54 2001
Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of the Dawn was put to rest.
Race: | dwarf | Class: | Warrior | Level: | 51 | Alignment: | Evil | Ethos: | Lawful | Cabal: | DAWN, the Servants of the Dawn | Hours: | 191 | PK Ratio: | 3% (closer to 100% is better) |
495, RE: (AUTO) Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of the Dawn
Posted by Zebulost on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Sat Mar 24 2:30:54 2001 > > >Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of >the Dawn was put to >rest. > >Race: | dwarf | Class: | Warrior | Level: | 51 | Alignment: | Evil | Was he really evil, or is the graveyard broken?
498, RE: (AUTO) Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of the Dawn
Posted by jullias on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>>Sat Mar 24 2:30:54 2001 >> >> >>Thornan the Knight Hero, Servant of >>the Dawn was put to >>rest. >> >>Race: | dwarf | Class: | Warrior |
>Was he really evil, or is >the graveyard broken?
He could have still been neutral but his alignment was less than exact center (which is 0). I will get this fixed to more accurately reflect the alignments.
--jullias
496, RE: Thornan - was never evil and never auto-deleted
Posted by Dawnie! (Guest) on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
To whom it may concern,
Thornan, Dwarven Warrior for the Dawn, his character was banned for losing link while being attacked in galadon.
His character was never evil.
Thanks!
|
497, RE: Thornan - was never evil and never auto-deleted
Posted by Thornan (Guest) on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
first of all i did not lose link. and i did not auto-delete. yes i was attacked in galadon, but i also only had one more death and i was going to die of con-loss, and when i awoke in galadon i was attacked and died, and i heard the horses and the grim reaper as well. i had a con-loss death, not an aotu-delte or a delete.
thanks. Thornan
|
|
|
| |