Go back to previous topic
Forum Name The Battlefield
Topic subject(DELETED) [EMPIRE] Undemelm Erusu the Affirmation of Life, Imperial High Priest
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=131244
131244, (DELETED) [EMPIRE] Undemelm Erusu the Affirmation of Life, Imperial High Priest
Posted by Death_Angel on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sun Jun 11 00:34:24 2017

At 9 o'clock PM, Day of Thunder, 3rd of the Month of the Frost Giant
on the Theran calendar Undemelm perished, never to return.
Race:dark-elf
Class:healer
Level:51
Alignment:Evil
Ethos:Orderly
Cabal:EMPIRE, the Empire
Age:284
Hours:292
131245, RE: (DELETED) [EMPIRE] Undemelm Erusu the Affirmation of Life, Imperial High Priest
Posted by Undemelm on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
This was my first hero in about seven years, thanks to Ishuli for putting up with my subpar RP.

Thanks to Sacer for the amazing area to explore. Maybe someday I'll finish it off.

The playerbase is the worst part of CF.
131253, RE: (DELETED) [EMPIRE] Undemelm Erusu the Affirmation of Life, Imperial High Priest
Posted by sleepy on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I'm interested in knowing why you think the playerbase is the worst part. Do you mean numbers, or people's actual personalities? I don't agree or disagree, just curious to know your thoughts.
131256, I liked Undemelm. Good RP. Thumbs up. nt
Posted by Acra on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
nt
131257, You are part of the problem and I tell you why...
Posted by Buon on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I was stuck in a locked room and asked for your help for the key - easily obtainable by a hero - you wouldn't even response. We are team Empire.
131258, RE: You are part of the problem and I tell you why...
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Should have offered something in return, even if its just an I.O.U. He's team Divine. You're team Blade.
131259, RE: You are part of the problem and I tell you why...
Posted by Undemelm on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
You should join Acolytes if you think that's how it should be.
131261, Oh is that the name of the perma these days? n/t
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Gr
131265, RE: Oh is that the name of the perma these days? n/t
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
What does this even mean?
131264, Re: playerbase is the worst
Posted by Murphy on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Perhaps if you stopped melting their steel beams worn containers...
131272, It's funny...
Posted by k-b on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I actually think the playerbase is better now then it ever has been in my 20 years playing.

Furthermore, if there were an offending group, I would have to say that Empire is the worst among them. Perma's galore, cheating characters (Shapaa), and the single biggest prick that I've ever encountered in this game (Glik) who also happens to be your Emperor.

So I find it funny that you say the playerbase is bad. Unless, in a very meta turn of events, you are in fact referring to yourself.
131277, RE: It's funny...
Posted by Undemelm on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
You're welcome to believe what you want but this is the whiniest, self absorbed playerbase I've ever encountered. This game is only a shadow of what it could be and it's because of who is playing it.

You can cry about perma groups all day but if it were a problem, would someone not have said something to me? At least once in 292 hours? I had a single PVE focus, I didn't involve myself in PK unless I was forced to and I was online 95% of my life, literally alone.

There were Maran who would look at me while I was fighting their outer and then they would just word of recall and logout and let me slowly retrieve my item. No, they didn't "have to go." they did this more than once.

There was one person who invented some sort of irrational hatred for me in his brain and rolled multiple characters to try and kill me and didn't really try to hide the fact that he did that, even hinted at it IC.

Yep, Glikhardiz is definitely a problem player, he will anathema any Shadow that becomes Elite so he'll never have a full council to oust him. I would have got rid of him in a heartbeat given the opportunity but without Kotu or any other council around, there's no chance of that ever happening in this lifetime.

Say what you want about Shaapa but from my point of view he was one of the better people to interact with in game, super appreciative.

Also as a side note, anyone who lists off Shaapa's past string of characters in an unironic way IC as a reference to Shaapa's current characters should delete, your RP might be slightly worse than mine. You know who you are.

Anyway, enough of all this. Feel free to deflect it all back to me again, I honestly don't care. To those who actually roleplay and bring a character to life, thanks for being there.
131278, Re: Perma Stuff
Posted by Destuvius on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
This is the only thing I really feel like chiming in on. Its painfully obvious that there was some questionable antics driven via OOC connections within Empire. It was a conscious choice to not swing the hammer even though, it could very easily be argued that it would be justified. Instead, we gave you guys some extra wiggle room to "do it right."

Sadly what has happened here is you guys all delete right after the other when someone even makes mention that you may want to consider being less obvious of a perma. I guess my point in this is all that you guys had a chance to break the perception and all you did was reinforce it.
131279, I think you guys don't understand how RotD works
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
You think it's "even makes mention", but perception on the other end is so way different, and it's obvious many of you don't realize that. I'm quite sure you've seen tens if not hundreds of players deleting in RotD or right after it and thought "Oh what a sissy? I didn't even threaten or something, and was friendly".

Ever wondered why?

Basicly the only type of players who won't get hurt by RotD pulls are those who don't give a #### about what you say there, not those who abide by your words :)
131314, We finally agree on something.
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Uh oh, CF is about to die lol
131330, We agree on many things, Sam
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Except for what can and cannot be said. You're on my FU list for exactly that reason.
131343, Still a twat. Good to know. Feel better each day about cutting out Dio's. NT
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
NT
131283, RE: Re: Perma Stuff
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I never lied about any OOC connection within Empire but if you can call someone who's online SOLO for 90% of their lifetime a permagroup, we have different definitions of the term.

Does simply knowing someone ooc constitute a permagroup? I don't think so. Either way, it's your sandbox and your rules to enforce, not my fault if you don't followup with them. I don't care about anyone's perception, if they can whine about something, they will.
131289, I've deleted over a couple of unsubstantiated 'warnings'.
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Basically if I hit ROTD for any reason I'll probably delete. ROTD means you've been branded a cheater for the most part, even if the reason you are there turns out not to be a valid one and you don't get in 'trouble'.

I know you or Akresius transferred me a couple of times to say 'it looks like you're doing XYZ' with me saying 'No not really and here's why' followed by me deleting shortly after being put back at market square. ROTD shouldn't be for conversations. Just wait for solid evidence of cheating and deny, that'd be far more preferable.

But yeah this was very noticeably a perma because the playerbase at this point is under the general opinion of hey perma's are okay I'm just playing with my friends. Just sort of a blurred line that is very obvious now that the playerbase is so much lower. Also no if you're logging in by yourself just to hang out to make it look like you play alone yeah its still a perma. =P
131290, RE: I've deleted over a couple of unsubstantiated 'warnings'.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
It's a catch 22, I would login alone just hoping someone else will login to do something, but no one else ever did, my play times pretty much were pretty empty. If someone wanted to do something, I would have gladly done it within the confines of RP.

Not like it matters anymore, you're welcome to think what you want, this will likely be the last hero you guys see out of me anyway, so you won't have to worry about it.


131359, RE: I've deleted over a couple of unsubstantiated 'warnings'.
Posted by Mort on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I've been pulled into ROTD for "cheating", which ended up with just getting threatened and demanded I confess for something I had no idea about, including using my real name to put pressure on me.

I didn't cave in, obviously, and finally the imm relented and let me out with a final "IM WATCHING YOU" threat, but that character was pretty much ruined and I just let 'em auto.
131308, How gracious of you
Posted by Bemused on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Sadly what happened here is you and Umiron were allowed to IMM and basically chip away at what was once a great MUD.

I must have played 1000+ hours of Imperials over the last couple of years and haven't seen you on once. You don't even bother commenting on 600+ hours of two Empire characters that just deleted except to say how generous you are by not denying them (since apparently you could easily justify it right)? Also, if you *actually* believe it is justified then PvE on CF is dead.

You're a sad little man.
131315, Is Destuvius the new RayBaer/Valg/Cador or is it Umiron?
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
We must know these things.
131326, RE: Re: Perma Stuff
Posted by Shalic on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>This is the only thing I really feel like chiming in on. Its
>painfully obvious that there was some questionable antics
>driven via OOC connections within Empire. It was a conscious
>choice to not swing the hammer even though, it could very
>easily be argued that it would be justified. Instead, we gave
>you guys some extra wiggle room to "do it right."
>
>Sadly what has happened here is you guys all delete right
>after the other when someone even makes mention that you may
>want to consider being less obvious of a perma. I guess my
>point in this is all that you guys had a chance to break the
>perception and all you did was reinforce it.

You do have somewhat of a point, Kotu probably jumped the gun, I think he already had enough at that point. However, the principle remains, any kind of ROTD visit for PVE really is going too far on a mud that has insufficient player base for such a rule.

You probably noticed no Kotu/Shalic duo death squad going around? I assure you we could have seriously hurt some feelings :) We almost didn't even group outside of hell or a few other bits of PVE. I do agree with some of the imms that banned me more than a decade ago, it is unfair to be pked by a same site duo or trio.

I think it's just too far on PVE.

The biggest killer seems to be the inconsistency depending on which imm comes back or is online at certain times. I am sure there are several imms that don't have a problem with some PVE permas, especially when each person is playing solo at other times as well.
131331, " I am sure there are several imms that don't have a problem with some PVE permas,"
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Should read:

"I am sure there are several imms that don't have the tools to prove some PVE permas"
131332, Well if you don't have the proof
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
GTFO.
131333, What I'm saying...
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Is people are complaining about Destuvius for being cador and blah blah blah he is oppressing us yadda yadda but he is probably one of the few current imms with access to verify cheat things. So it might not be Destuvius has a perverse pleasure of denying people, he just might be the only one with both interest in and access to such things that is active.
131334, It wasn't Destuvius who
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
ruined the current imperial PvE effort. FFS, the guys were doing content that was never ever touched in CF history.

First you remove exploration edges, then you go and molest people who still explore despite your efforts. I just don't get why a man would do that.
131335, RE: It wasn't Destuvius who
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I want to clear the air about this, the only one who affected our efforts was Kotu. I don't blame( and no one else should either) Umiron or Destuvius because Bemused gets his panties in a twist as soon as someone mentions their name.

No one did or said anything to us, there's no conspiracy here. Kotu deleted, my character wouldn't have even existed in the first place if he didn't ask me to make it so I deleted too. The end.
131336, It's me who blames, not you :)
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
NT
131280, I won't press the matter.
Posted by k-b on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I will say that CF has always been self-absorbed and whiney. I wasn't saying that it isn't that, just that it's always been that, but now there's generally better sportsmanship and RP has generally gone up across the board. So it is the 'best' it's ever been. It just was never very good to begin with. ;)

On to perma. Why why why won't you perma people just make neutral neutral characters with no cabal affiliation to explore? The real problem comes when you bring a cabal dynamic into the situation. Without that, I honestly wouldn't care that four or five of you go exploring around CF. But when you join a cabal, especially a high PK cabal like Empire, you are thrust into a war that people really care about. You also allow dog-#### characters like Glik to take advantage of support characters like yourself to their nefarious and petty ends.

I would honestly like immortal comment on this. Would you IMMs care about neutral neutral uncaballed explore permas? I'm not the explore type, so I'm not asking for myself. But maybe this would give the perma'ing type something to think about... You know. Compromise, and all that jazz.
131281, RE: I won't press the matter.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Imperial powers are hands down the best in the game for exploration, we could not have done what we did in any other cabal or as uncaballed.
131304, Damn Jhyrb, first healer ever?
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Or first since like 2001?
131307, RE: Damn Jhyrb, first healer ever?
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
first ever
131317, Why you're a boss. Imperial Healer = Best Healer though. NT
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
NT
131325, RE: Why you're a boss. Imperial Healer = Best Healer though. NT
Posted by Shalic on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Well I will add, it was a complete pleasure to group with you Jhy.
It was like it was 1999 again only this time you were playing off-peak instead of us.

Hell trip is off to a good start when you got Jhy in the group.

It is a shame we didn't get to do anything outside of hell, my playing time never matched yours.
131282, This has to be said
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I'm sorry Glik pked you in a pk mud :)
131287, Glik has never killed any of the three characters I've fought him as.
Posted by k-b on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Not as Merietta. Not as Svelgurd. Not as my current.
131288, RE: Glik has never killed any of the three characters I've fought him as.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I want to go out on a limb and say you're the guy who looked at me while I was raiding the Maran then worded and logged out.

AIM logs travel fast.
131291, Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by k-b on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
You did, however, sit in your guild while myself and one other took your item even though you could have called in Tribunal help.

You then proceeded to sit in your guild until we logged off. So there's that.
131293, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
If they wanted healers to defend they'd let us heal the guardians. They don't though, bad game design.
131294, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Huh? Imperial healers can't heal/sanc the Vanquisher and/or inners?
131295, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
No, healers can't heal any NPC.
131296, Thanks again Umiron. n/t
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
gr
131297, RE: Thanks again Umiron. n/t
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
I don't care about the change one way or the other, just don't be upset when I don't bother defending when I'm alone.
131298, I thought it made 0 sense.
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Still doesn't. I get the whole suspension of disbelief thing at times, but like...you are basically saying it is okay to act like mobs are not real in the fantasy sense and to treat them like trash as a healer, yet killing or even stealing from a neutral NPC as a goodie is punishable...but your healer isn't allowed to save their life because they aren't real.
131299, RE: I thought it made 0 sense.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Yeah, whoever made the change probably spent a night trying to retrieve through a healer and gave up. It reeks of a kneejerk change without a lot of thought put into it - same with healers losing fly, the fact that all fly sources can be dispelled by mages now is a huge game changing mechanic. Yanni + Thaedan combo can literally kill anyone that ever comes to fight them, no problem.
131305, One thing...
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>whoever made the change probably spent a night trying to retrieve through a healer and gave up<

This IS the reason they made the change. I think it was at the same time they made the change about Imperial lands gaining another way in/out.

The reason they stated (and something I kinda agree with) was that a Hero Healer could literally stop 3-5 mid-range chars from retrieving INDEFINITELY.

And thus, they were looking at ways to make retrieving against a hero healer as a mid/lowbie something that could actually happen.

I mean, ####, my pre-Hero healer could stop Hero raids with some well-timed sancs/heals so yeah.
131313, Late "Edit"
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
The logic behind it was that it wasn't fun for anyone involved, not the Healer spending 2 hrs sitting around just healing Outers/Inners nor the attempting retrievers.
131322, HEALERS
Posted by N b M on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
If you want to make healers applicable in pk but not overpowered.

Give them the ability to sanc everyone and everything in and out of combat

The ability to heal all player characters in and out of combat

The ability to heal NPCs ONLY out of combat

There, fixed
131309, Is Yanni a made up name here?
Posted by Lhydia on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Wasn't Yanni that weird soft rock piano guy?
131311, RE: Is Yanni a made up name here?
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Yeah....


131327, I bet it was Umiron
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
who failed to reraid against Zhabala on one bad day.
131301, RE: Thanks again Umiron. n/t
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Didn't you have gear that instakills though? With that, you could have just showed up, attacked someone, them spammed he's on yourself while waiting for it to prog.
131302, RE: Thanks again Umiron. n/t
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Ah, so you advocate that I run around insta killing people? Only 1 person didn't instantly rage delete when that happened to them. I purposely avoided PKs so people *wouldn't* rage delete.
131306, Another thing...
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
While I agree having people refuse to fight you/etc sucks...from what I was told you had an absurd hell set.

Of which included a shield that destroys weapons.

An insta-kill item.

etc

So it's somewhat not surprising some players would be reticent to fight you. I stopped fighting Venara until Amora was able to loot that ####ing #### ass ring when Venara died at Empire.
131310, RE: Another thing...
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
It was an ok set.

I understand why people wouldn't want to fight me, all those reasons being paper thin in the context of a ROLEPLAYING game. Players are too worried about their PK counter and equipment.
131312, For me it's not necessarily loosing a set/PK loss...
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
...it's the risk/reward counter being too heavily stacked in one side.

And I'm a guy who lives for 10/90 fights, to be honest.

Fighting a character like Venara or an Imperial High Priest Healer who can basically counter a lot of tactics with sheer healing/protective ability is a lot different than fighting a conservative deadly character like Glik.

That being said, if I had been in range I would have tried you :( I always enjoy saccing Hell/Silent gear :) :)

Edited to add: Just because you won't ever have another hero doesn't mean you can't join my "perma" in the mid-ranges :) :) (since my character is ranking SLOW AS #### lol).
131318, RE: For me it's not necessarily loosing a set/PK loss...
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Ya, you would have tried and failed then most likely whined about how much better my EQ was than the obvious things people saw, like insta kill and acid storm. :) That was just the tip of the iceberg.

131319, Nah, I would have died to you 5-7 times...
Posted by TMNS on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
...posted logs where I whined about how OP you were, which would lead to you letting your guard down...and then I would kill you...die to you with all your hell gear in my inventory 10 minutes later, and delete in shame.

Just being honest.
131321, RE: Nah, I would have died to you 5-7 times...
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Nah bro, I wouldn't let you die that often to me, that's just embarrassing.
131300, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Isildur on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Hah. Nuts. Is that just evil healers?
131303, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Nope, can't heal any NPC that you are not grouped with.
131341, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Retriever on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>No, healers can't heal any NPC.

That's not true, as you yourself know. You stood and healed the vanquisher for hours while I tried to retrieve, and I saw you do it with others. You used mass heal. If the purpose was to keep healers from preventing out of range people from retrieving, they should fix this oversight, because that's just what you did. A lot.
131342, RE: Nope. You and I were never in the same room.
Posted by Jhyrbian on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Which isn't feasible while fighting a PK, mass heal is a #### supplication for healing. Only effective vs level 20s or lower. I did that two or three times in my life. Is that "a lot" ?

131351, Obviously not intended.
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Report it, Umiron will fix it in no time
131284, For example
Posted by Kstatida on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Because imperial defense on a bard makes for one of the best PvE tanks in game.
131360, RE: (DELETED) [EMPIRE] Undemelm Erusu the Affirmation of Life, Imperial High Priest
Posted by Ishuli on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
It wasn't so bad. I still think we had some fun. Thumbs up to you for asking the right parties whether your topics were appropriate.


Otherwise I was still mindblown over certain achievements of yours that I really didn't think were going to happen. So that was actually really cool - who would think to bring THAT many shields?

Thanks for the fun, wish you had stuck it out, I was planning for a nifty reward pretty soon. Who wouldn't want an 'aspect of the devil' when you're diving into them so often?