Go back to previous topic
Forum Name Bug Submissions
Topic subjectCorporeal hardening doesn't affect damage?
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=17&topic_id=19974
19974, Corporeal hardening doesn't affect damage?
Posted by Muterman on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
PROTECTED civilized <370hp 567m 506mv 15875tnl (-22.87%) 10 AM> score damage
Bash : Normal Pierce : Normal
Slash : Normal Fire : Normal
Cold : Normal Lightning : Normal
Acid : Normal Poison : Normal
Negative : Normal Holy : Normal
Energy : Normal Mental : Normal
Disease : Normal Drowning : Normal
Light : Normal

PROTECTED civilized <370hp 567m 506mv 15875tnl (-22.87%) 10 AM> af
You are affected by:
Spell: 'invis' for 23 hours.
Spell: 'metabolic slowing' modifies dexterity by -4 for 9 hours.
Spell: 'pass door' for 8 hours.
Spell: 'corporeal hardening' modifies dexterity by -2 for 3 hours.
Spell: 'ocular enhancement' for 1 hours.
Spell: 'ocular enhancement' for 1 hours.
Spell: 'relaxation' modifies moves by 100 for 0 hours.
Spell: 'relaxation' modifies movement regeneration by 25 for 0 hours.
Spell: 'fly' for 0 hours.

FWIW toughened skin seems to work as expected but arcane absorption, corporeal hardening, and desensitize do not.
19980, RE: Corporeal hardening doesn't affect damage?
Posted by Zulghinlour on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
It doesn't affect any particular damage type, no. It affects all damage.
19981, RE: Corporeal hardening doesn't affect damage?
Posted by Rade on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Are those things (and I'm assuming a/b/s/protection) different mechanisms altogether? It would be nice to be able to know your total level of protections. Any chance of reconsidering it showing up in score damage?
19982, RE: Corporeal hardening doesn't affect damage?
Posted by Zulghinlour on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>Are those things (and I'm assuming a/b/s/protection)
>different mechanisms altogether?

Yes.

>It would be nice to be able
>to know your total level of protections. Any chance of
>reconsidering it showing up in score damage?

Not any time soon. It would be another huge undertaking to re-write all of the non-damagetype-specific resistance.