| Go
back to previous topic |
| Forum Name |
Bug Submissions | | Topic subject | Tainted wild versus Preservation | | Topic
URL | https://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=17&topic_id=17355 |
17355, Tainted wild versus Preservation
Posted by outish on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Is it meant to be that the tattoo of Grobbak which has the power to taint the wild, cannot be fixed the power of preservation?
|
17358, You are high as a kite.
Posted by Daevryn on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
No part of this post, as far as I know or can discern through looking at the code, bears any resemblance to anything actually in the game.
|
17359, not quite high at all
Posted by outish on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
Well, maybe I am wrong, perhaps it is not the power of Grobbak's tattoo.
Thing is, there is a certain necro, somehow has the ability to corrupt wilderness, which the outlander's power of preservation cannot restore the wilderness from the corruption.
The main question is, is it meant to be that the power of preservation cannot restore the wilderness from corruption caused by that certain necro? Somehow I am keen to believe that it is done by invoking Grobbak's tattoo, which of course as I earlier stated that I may be wrong.
|
17360, Heh. n/t
Posted by Grobbak on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
G.
| |