>agree that we need less cabals? with less players online?
>
>1) It will bring more dinamic/fun to all, yep? I know, its
>hard to break things that some imms were deploing for years,
>but dudes, we need it.

I don't think CF needs fewer cabals, but I'm not opposed. What I'm not interested in is shoehorn solutions, half measures, etc. I think the cabals we have are high quality both in terms of their dogma and design, even if not all of them are always full. If/when we come up with ideas we like more than the status quo and someone has the time/desire to code them, then we'll see.

>2) Exp/Obs exp is good when it comes with the level.

I don't know what this means, exactly. Anyway, my preference would be to just get rid of EXP/OXP (giving no ####s about the impact on edges), but our PR firm has advised me against that in the strongest possible language. Sometimes I wonder what we're paying them for.