I don't actually have a problem with him being slayed for botting edge points, just that he was potentially slayed again without breaking the rules and most of all I don't think the way he spoken to was at all respectful or conducive to solving the problem.

I get it's volunteer and that's a little different, but I've had a few jobs where policy enforcement is just part of the deal, and if I ever said something like "No, what's "funny" (i.e., not) is how many people's response to being punished is "b-b-but THAT guy got away with it!". You got caught, you got punished. Move on."

I'd be told it was immature, reflects badly on everyone and I might even lose my contract. It's just one of those things where you should disassociate your feelings from the task, or risk doing more harm than good. Even when the other person was being a cock.

Because they're not being paid for it a great deal more leniency makes sense, but it's hard to look at this and say he's wrong to be left with a sour taste over the interaction.

Edges are a complicated problem because some people like them and some people probably want them gone (me) but as a PKer (before and after) I never focused on them much. I hate obs botters and I try to get them killed/otherwise interrupt. :p