Splntrd | Thu 03-Jun-10 09:37 AM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#32917, "How is not defending as a pledge bad behavior?"
|
They're not cabal members. They've only said they want to be. The only reason they can see cabal raids is as an aid; so they can choose to help and make themselves look good if they want to.
By not showing up they're punishing themselves enough already (by not exposing themselves to the rest of the cabal and forging relationships) that I don't really see a need for the cabal to punish them in other ways.
And, in the end, they're NOT members of the cabal. Fort leadership doesn't yet have power over them, except that if they want to eventually be members they have to suck up. Splntrd
|
|
|
Idea for the Members Command
[View all] , Ageryn, Wed 02-Jun-10 02:33 PM
You take this s**t way too seriously. ~,
_Magus_,
03-Jun-10 09:01 AM, #11
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Zulghinlour,
02-Jun-10 08:00 PM, #8
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 06:02 PM, #6
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Zulghinlour,
02-Jun-10 08:01 PM, #9
RE: Idea for the Members Command,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 10:00 PM, #10
How is not defending as a pledge bad behavior?,
Splntrd,
03-Jun-10 09:37 AM #12
Depends on the cabal,
Valkenar,
04-Jun-10 11:47 AM, #13
I agree.,
sorlag (Anonymous),
04-Jun-10 11:55 AM, #14
But there are already downsides to not showing.,
Splntrd,
04-Jun-10 02:46 PM, #15
What I'd rather see.,
sorlag (Anonymous),
02-Jun-10 04:58 PM, #4
disagree,
laxman,
02-Jun-10 02:46 PM, #1
RE: disagree,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 02:54 PM, #2
RE: disagree,
laxman,
02-Jun-10 04:52 PM, #3
RE: disagree,
Ageryn,
02-Jun-10 06:00 PM, #5
OH NOES!,
sleepy,
02-Jun-10 06:34 PM, #7
| |
|