Grudan | Mon 01-Jun-09 08:39 AM |
Member since 21st Sep 2007
57 posts
| |
|
#1999, "Challenge system on top of exploration idea"
|
This might be more work than it's worth, but I think it's a different direction for ideas anyway.
Step 1: Keep the wand system as is in terms of exploration. (That's the easy part.) Maybe go ahead with the detect artifact/edge changes anyway.
Step 2: Add a 'challenge' system to the game for mages.
At various levels, say 35 for Shield, 40 for aura and 50 for Barrier, mages can go to a specific zone (Tower of High Sorcery or other mage specific area) and accept a 'challenge' or 'test' if you will.
This 'test' would in it's simplest form be a direct 1v1 fight versus a very difficult mob for the entry level. Probably a member of the same class as the caster, geared for the level of the test. (So, in short, this would require creating 3 mobs for each mage class, at levels 35, 40 and 50) It would require multiple preps, sound tactics and perhaps a good amount of luck to win. Make the fight a fixed 1 person only affair, maybe the old Knights Force Duel code is still laying about, but expand the battlefield to a 3x3 'zone' or something to allow some form of fleeing/reprepping. Make it hard, we're talking Nep level of hard here. Let him go nuts with it.
Dying is normal costing you 1/3 a con and xp as usual, to avoid people just continually beating their head against them until they get a lucky set of saving throws.
If you like make it a moderately steep cost of entry. Say 100 gold to take the test. There's lots of ways to tweak this.
The prize for winning said contest, the guardian would then just flat out tells you where your wand for that test is.
The possible benefits I see from this:
1) It gives you the 'mage killing choke point' you guys seem to like. Battleragers know mages of various levels will go to this zone for tests, and what better time to jump them. Let the villagers kill the quest giver or something too if they want, or say the tests can't be taken if the veil is very thick.
2) It rewards players who know the game without having to reexamine every nook and cranny for the 100th time. If at level 35 you're capable of scrounging up enough preps/gear/healing to take on a very tough fight 1v1, then congrats you get your shield location handed to you. If balanced right, this could be minority of people who pull this off at the initial level.
3) It allows newbies to get a taste. Maybe I can't beat my level 35 shield guardian until I'm level 50, but at least I'll get a shield location and hopefully learn a bit more about how to play my class in a tough fight. And besides telling me 'Your aura wand is being held by XYZ in zone ABC' means I still have to find it and that mob, and kill it.
4) Hopefully it encourages mages to talk to each other about being mages. "Wow, that guardian is kicking my ass, any tips how to beat them?" These, I feel are better conversations to be had then "Wow, any ideas what rocks I can look under for magic sticks?" Although, those conversations can happen also since people can still randomly explore to get theirs.
Potential downsides:
1) Not sure how you handle twinking. Do maran mages get it easier since they can likely find someone willing to sanc them before going in? Perhaps dispel everyone before they zone into the test, not sure.
2) As I said, it might be a pain to create 15 new mobs for these tests. Balancing them going forward might be difficult too, not sure. Could a dark-elf AP and a Fire Giant AP be expected to fight the same mob? Can all shapeshifter focii be epxected to fight the same mobs? Are water/water focii screwed? (Maybe you can make the shapeshifter test mobs so they mirror the forms of the testee, not sure on that.)
Anyway, even if no one likes the idea, maybe it'll give different directions to ponder in.
My feedback on the edges, by the way.
I don't like the idea of +1 location edges because it widens the gap between people who gets lists OOC and people who explore on their own two feet. Now, not only does having an OOC list get you your wands faster, but it now also potentially saves you a lot of edge points.
The people who need to use those edges, are really the last people who can afford to put themselves in a hole like that. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system
[View all] , Zulghinlour, Mon 25-May-09 11:52 PM
Area based.,
Semaphore,
13-Aug-09 10:39 AM, #230
RE: Area based.,
Daevryn,
13-Aug-09 10:40 AM, #231
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Jugynheim,
27-Jul-09 10:22 PM, #228
Slight addition to detect artifact?,
Habbs,
15-Jul-09 02:45 PM, #224
*Thumbs up* N/t,
Alandale (Guest),
15-Jul-09 11:00 PM, #225
That would be interesting! nt,
Dervish,
17-Jul-09 11:09 PM, #226
And another idea,
Habbs,
27-Jul-09 10:22 PM, #227
*Thumbs Down* (Wall-o-text),
Seil clavin (Guest),
11-Aug-09 09:08 PM, #229
Small request,
Kadsies (Guest),
07-Jul-09 12:28 PM, #214
It isnt that hard, ive gotten the quest @ level 37.,
Cerunnir,
07-Jul-09 02:38 PM, #215
And remember that 'k' is right next to 'l' when you loo...,
Abernytee (Guest),
08-Jul-09 09:28 AM, #219
RE: And remember that 'k' is right next to 'l' when you...,
Cerunnir,
09-Jul-09 11:09 PM, #222
So you're just not very observant? (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
07-Jul-09 01:14 PM, #216
I would live RL in brief if I could. n/t,
Kadsies (Guest),
07-Jul-09 06:40 PM, #217
Married man? -nt-,
Mek (Guest),
07-Jul-09 08:23 PM, #218
I permanently turned brief off after obs xp was introdu...,
DurNominator,
08-Jul-09 09:28 AM, #220
Instant-Fix.,
Magey (Guest),
06-Jul-09 09:18 PM, #213
RE: Instant-Fix.,
Magey (Guest),
09-Jul-09 11:09 PM, #221
I like this Idea but...,
Iza,
09-Jul-09 11:09 PM, #223
Work scrolls into the mix,
Doof (Guest),
04-Jul-09 12:40 AM, #212
Weaker alternatives,
Void,
17-Jun-09 11:27 AM, #209
One more change and you are done! txt,
SomeDude (Guest),
16-Jun-09 01:53 PM, #203
Eh.,
Daevryn,
16-Jun-09 01:57 PM, #204
RE: Eh.,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jun-09 02:05 PM, #205
Just a thought from a player perspective,
Mek (Guest),
16-Jun-09 02:29 PM, #207
What Mekantos said. nt,
SomeDude (Guest),
16-Jun-09 03:01 PM, #208
Agreed,
Habbs,
17-Jun-09 09:38 PM, #210
Please...,
Forsakenz (Guest),
16-Jun-09 02:29 PM, #206
One thing that would definitely help,
Mek (Guest),
15-Jun-09 02:49 PM, #201
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Eskelian,
13-Jun-09 12:06 PM, #198
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Eskelian-lazy (Guest),
24-Jun-09 02:50 PM, #211
Sir - Some concise thoughts from a no-OOC cheat ring ex...,
Humbert,
13-Jun-09 10:34 AM, #197
I really good suggestion!,
Arrna (Guest),
13-Jun-09 10:07 PM, #199
I agree you old woman!,
Humbet (Guest),
14-Jun-09 12:12 PM, #200
My Idea: Making Mages Viable.,
Iza,
12-Jun-09 06:23 PM, #190
This is actually a really good idea with a few changes.,
Vet (Guest),
12-Jun-09 06:49 PM, #191
Though your missing a vital point...,
Arrna (Guest),
12-Jun-09 08:19 PM, #192
RE: My Idea: Making Mages Viable.,
Daevryn,
12-Jun-09 07:25 PM, #193
But...,
Iza,
13-Jun-09 10:34 AM, #196
Why not just keep it like it was with a few changes?,
Vet (Guest),
11-Jun-09 07:44 PM, #187
Do away with the massive -regen on damredux.,
VargLazy (Guest),
11-Jun-09 07:44 PM, #185
Idea: Something for everyone,
Artificial,
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #179
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Isildur,
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #178
The problem I have with cool down timers,
Dragomir,
11-Jun-09 07:44 PM, #184
RE: The problem I have with cool down timers,
Isildur,
12-Jun-09 03:14 PM, #189
Problem,
Mek (Guest),
11-Jun-09 07:44 PM, #186
But now they are #### more anyway, so why to bother? n/...,
Dervish,
12-Jun-09 09:45 AM, #188
Another Suggestion, Way different than current txt,
SomeDude (Guest),
10-Jun-09 02:16 PM, #170
For the record....,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 02:36 PM, #171
Fine. Just throwing out ideas! nt,
Larcat,
10-Jun-09 02:37 PM, #172
Do away with sleeks.,
KennyPowers (Guest),
10-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #160
Zulgh, man.,
Dallevian,
10-Jun-09 11:37 AM, #157
RE: Zulgh, man.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 11:41 AM, #158
I have, yo.,
Dal Forsaken (Guest),
10-Jun-09 01:48 PM, #168
RE: I have, yo.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 09:04 PM, #173
But you're open to it?,
Forsakenz (Guest),
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #177
Other reasons I like my idea.,
Forsakenz (Guest),
10-Jun-09 02:16 PM, #169
RE: Other reasons I like my idea.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 09:09 PM, #174
Suggestion for a system.,
SomeDude (Guest),
09-Jun-09 10:17 PM, #151
You stole my idea.... which I stole from Rade. Totally ...,
Java,
09-Jun-09 10:51 PM, #155
Sorry, didn't read the whole thread. Good idea! nt,
SomeDude (Guest),
10-Jun-09 11:37 AM, #156
RE: Suggestion for a system.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 11:43 AM, #159
RE: Suggestion for a system.,
Tac,
10-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #161
Specific answers.,
SomeDude (Guest),
10-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #162
RE: Specific answers.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 01:36 PM, #165
Devil's Advocate...,
Tac,
10-Jun-09 01:48 PM, #167
RE: Devil's Advocate...,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 09:12 PM, #175
RE: Devil's Advocate...,
Java,
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #182
Isn't the idea to NOT have "difficult" and "easy" locat...,
Java,
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #180
RE: Specific answers.,
Dervish,
12-Jun-09 08:19 PM, #194
RE: Specific answers.,
Daevryn,
12-Jun-09 08:45 PM, #195
An alternate form of the same basic idea.,
SomeDude (Guest),
10-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #163
Another note....,
SomeDude (Guest),
10-Jun-09 01:24 PM, #164
RE: Suggestion for a system.,
Java,
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #181
I think plain and simple it should be like this.,
Vet (Guest),
02-Jun-09 02:21 PM, #146
RE: I think plain and simple it should be like this.,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 01:38 PM, #166
Challenge system on top of exploration idea,
Grudan,
01-Jun-09 10:27 AM #140
RE: Challenge system on top of exploration idea,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 09:17 PM, #176
RE: Challenge system on top of exploration idea,
Grudan - Guest (Guest),
11-Jun-09 09:37 AM, #183
New system suggestion,
Exit,
01-Jun-09 02:30 AM, #134
RE: New system suggestion,
Exit,
01-Jun-09 08:10 AM, #136
RE: New system suggestion,
Daevryn,
01-Jun-09 08:25 AM, #139
RE: New system suggestion,
Exitguest (Guest),
01-Jun-09 06:55 PM, #143
Just one thing from your post here...,
SomeDude (Guest),
09-Jun-09 10:17 PM, #152
If you read what Zulg has been saying....,
Arrna (Guest),
01-Jun-09 08:10 AM, #138
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Rade_ (Guest),
01-Jun-09 12:30 AM, #133
I like the second part of this..,
Java,
01-Jun-09 08:10 AM, #135
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Straklaw,
01-Jun-09 08:10 AM, #137
There's only one check per location. So you go there, a...,
Java,
01-Jun-09 04:13 PM, #141
I'm refererring to new characters, not the same one.,
Straklaw,
02-Jun-09 10:02 AM, #145
Which isn't any better in the current system..,
Java,
02-Jun-09 07:18 PM, #148
RE: I'm refererring to new characters, not the same one...,
Rade_ (Guest),
04-Jun-09 03:11 PM, #149
I think, if it was done right....,
Tac,
04-Jun-09 11:27 PM, #150
Too exploitable,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 10:17 PM, #153
So you wouldn't try getting them at lvl 30 or so?,
Java,
09-Jun-09 10:51 PM, #154
Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 04:59 PM, #95
Will RC rewarded shield remain the same?,
RC winner (Guest),
28-May-09 06:28 PM, #96
Likely, yes (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:13 PM, #103
Things I'd like to ask/tweak,
Guy (Guest),
28-May-09 06:28 PM, #97
RE: Things I'd like to ask/tweak,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:17 PM, #104
YES PLEASE MASSA! I really like this.~,
Treebeard1 (Guest),
28-May-09 06:28 PM, #98
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Dervish,
28-May-09 06:28 PM, #99
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:22 PM, #105
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Dervish,
28-May-09 11:02 PM, #113
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 11:04 PM, #114
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Dervish,
28-May-09 11:27 PM, #115
I know you're bending over backward here.,
Scrimbul,
30-May-09 10:52 AM, #123
RE: I know you're bending over backward here.,
Zulghinlour,
30-May-09 07:23 PM, #128
Some feedback,
Mek (Guest),
28-May-09 06:28 PM, #100
RE: Some feedback,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:25 PM, #106
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Isildur,
28-May-09 07:02 PM, #101
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:30 PM, #108
that sounds pretty do-able,
Aodh,
28-May-09 07:07 PM, #102
RE: that sounds pretty do-able,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 07:31 PM, #109
I LOVE YOU. nt,
Lye (Guest),
28-May-09 07:37 PM, #110
Just curious,
Torak_guest (Guest),
28-May-09 08:52 PM, #111
RE: Just curious,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 08:53 PM, #112
Concerns within.,
Splntrd,
29-May-09 01:09 AM, #116
RE: Concerns within.,
Zulghinlour,
29-May-09 01:11 AM, #117
Love this idea.,
Zephon,
29-May-09 08:49 PM, #118
I like this idea.,
Koe (Guest),
29-May-09 11:35 PM, #119
RE: Zulg's thoughts, hashed out with a few other IMPS,
DurNominator,
30-May-09 10:52 AM, #120
I am on board with this 100%...,
_Magus_,
30-May-09 10:52 AM, #122
RE: I am on board with this 100%...,
Zulghinlour,
30-May-09 07:16 PM, #126
So when-ish are you expecting this to go in?,
anon_ (Guest),
30-May-09 06:12 PM, #124
I currently have no timeline (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
30-May-09 07:14 PM, #125
RE: So when-ish are you expecting this to go in?,
Daevryn,
31-May-09 11:47 AM, #131
One quick question...,
Dragomir,
31-May-09 01:01 AM, #129
RE: One quick question...,
Zulghinlour,
31-May-09 01:02 AM, #130
Like it. ~,
Abernytee (Guest),
31-May-09 05:36 PM, #132
Small detect artifact adjustment for Outlanders.,
ibuki,
02-Jun-09 02:42 AM, #144
more drawback ideas,
Laxminator (Guest),
02-Jun-09 07:18 PM, #147
If anyone's been keeping score....,
Daevryn,
16-Jun-09 01:41 PM, #202
Supplemental idea.,
Forsakenz (Guest),
28-May-09 02:39 PM, #92
RE: Supplemental idea.,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 04:54 PM, #94
More wand locatons pop based on hours.,
Ayalah (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #80
What about something closer to the Thief ingredient sys...,
Yhorian (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #79
I like this idea if...,
Forsakenz (Guest),
28-May-09 01:45 PM, #91
No huge change needed.,
Pissudin (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #77
RE: No huge change needed.,
Daevryn,
28-May-09 10:46 AM, #83
Yup, i know...,
Pissudin (Guest),
28-May-09 12:08 PM, #87
I agree with this.,
Cerunnir,
28-May-09 11:21 AM, #85
RE: I agree with this.,
Isildur,
28-May-09 12:50 PM, #88
RE: No huge change needed.,
Isildur,
28-May-09 12:50 PM, #89
Use the guildmaster (sorry if this is a repeat),
Abernytee (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #76
RE: Use the guildmaster (sorry if this is a repeat),
Zulghinlour,
30-May-09 07:17 PM, #127
One crazy idea that is not so crazy actually,
Dwoggurd,
27-May-09 11:13 PM, #70
This isn't even worth a response (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 11:19 PM, #74
ROFL! I LOVE this idea. n/t,
ROFL (Guest),
01-Jun-09 06:55 PM, #142
Tricky question this.,
Istirith01 (Guest),
27-May-09 09:29 PM, #65
RE: Tricky question this.,
Daevryn,
27-May-09 09:55 PM, #68
Quick aside, four path invoker is very viable.,
TMNS (Guest),
27-May-09 11:13 PM, #72
RE: Quick aside, four path invoker is very viable.,
Istirith01 (Guest),
27-May-09 11:41 PM, #75
RE: Fair enough.,
Istirith01 (Guest),
27-May-09 11:41 PM, #73
Is this too stupidly simple?,
Puppet (Guest),
27-May-09 08:34 PM, #60
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Theerkla,
27-May-09 08:13 PM, #57
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 08:16 PM, #58
a re-adjusting,
laxicus (Guest),
27-May-09 07:52 PM, #55
RE: a re-adjusting,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 08:43 PM, #62
RE: a re-adjusting,
Krysantur (Guest),
27-May-09 10:02 PM, #69
Aura/SHield/Barrier,
Lightmaged (Guest),
27-May-09 06:48 PM, #50
RE: Aura/SHield/Barrier,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 07:21 PM, #54
RE: Aura/SHield/Barrier,
Lightmaged (Guest),
27-May-09 09:29 PM, #64
Re,
Dwoggurd,
27-May-09 09:29 PM, #66
Goals,
Valkenar,
27-May-09 04:12 PM, #44
my idea:,
Isildur,
27-May-09 04:12 PM, #43
RE: my idea:,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 07:47 PM, #56
RE: my idea:,
Isildur,
27-May-09 08:54 PM, #63
RE: my idea:,
Daevryn,
27-May-09 09:26 PM, #67
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Valkenar,
27-May-09 03:12 PM, #42
Give limited versions of the protection spells to mages,
Jagaub,
27-May-09 01:57 PM, #41
RE: Give limited versions of the protection spells to m...,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 04:44 PM, #49
Give mages another protection spell, reduce power of th...,
Jagaub,
27-May-09 01:57 PM, #40
I'd be more inclined...,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 04:42 PM, #48
To keep it simple.,
The Heretic,
27-May-09 01:09 PM, #38
RE: To keep it simple.,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 04:28 PM, #47
I agree,
The Heretic,
27-May-09 06:48 PM, #51
RE: I agree,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 06:50 PM, #52
RE: I agree,
The Heretic,
28-May-09 11:21 AM, #84
Retooling ABS,
Yhorian (Guest),
26-May-09 07:57 PM, #34
Good idea! I'll give more input when at home. n/t,
Arrna (Guest),
27-May-09 12:30 PM, #37
RE: Retooling ABS,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 07:00 PM, #53
Slight alteration then...,
Yhorian (Guest),
27-May-09 08:34 PM, #59
RE: Slight alteration then...,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 08:38 PM, #61
Because you said that a big complaint was finding barri...,
Yhorian (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #78
Ah crap...I accidently deleted the three responses queu...,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 05:11 PM, #32
Don't change a thing. Ever again. st,
Conservative (Guest),
26-May-09 03:42 PM, #31
RE: Don't change a thing. Ever again. st,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 04:27 PM, #46
Another Idea,
EXB_ (Guest),
26-May-09 01:13 PM, #18
RE: Another Idea,
Daevryn,
26-May-09 01:17 PM, #20
RE: Another Idea,
Isildur,
26-May-09 03:29 PM, #24
RE: EXPLORATION,
A2,
27-May-09 12:08 PM, #36
RE: EXPLORATION,
Daevryn,
27-May-09 01:38 PM, #39
Sometimes you confuse me...,
EXB,
26-May-09 03:29 PM, #25
Just to log it here,
Dwoggurd,
26-May-09 12:13 PM, #9
RE: Just to log it here,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 12:47 PM, #13
Elaborating...,
Dwoggurd,
26-May-09 02:13 PM, #21
RE: Elaborating...,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 02:40 PM, #22
Well,
Dwoggurd,
26-May-09 03:42 PM, #30
RE: Well,
Graatchman (Guest),
26-May-09 06:14 PM, #33
RE: Well,
Zulghinlour,
27-May-09 04:25 PM, #45
Re,
Dwoggurd,
27-May-09 11:13 PM, #71
Here's the solution:,
Balrahd. (Guest),
26-May-09 12:13 PM, #8
I'm not Zulg, but this is a really bad idea,
Dwoggurd,
26-May-09 12:52 PM, #12
Why does that make it a bad idea?,
Balrahd. (Guest),
26-May-09 01:11 PM, #17
RE: Why does that make it a bad idea?,
Daevryn,
26-May-09 01:15 PM, #19
Admittedly,
Balrahd. (Guest),
26-May-09 03:29 PM, #26
Its a Terrible thing.,
Terrible (Guest),
26-May-09 03:29 PM, #29
RE: Here's the solution:,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 01:03 PM, #16
RE: Here's the solution:,
Isildur,
26-May-09 07:57 PM, #35
Hints,
Aodh,
26-May-09 12:13 PM, #7
RE: Hints,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 12:52 PM, #14
My (slightly refined) idea.,
Forsakenz (Guest),
26-May-09 10:50 AM, #4
RE: My (slightly refined) idea.,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 02:45 PM, #23
RE: My (slightly refined) idea.,
Daevryn,
26-May-09 03:24 PM, #28
No.,
Lye (Guest),
28-May-09 07:32 PM, #107
Don't DELETE me again!,
Forsakenz (Guest),
28-May-09 12:08 PM, #86
Stackable DR spell,
Tac,
26-May-09 10:50 AM, #3
RE: Stackable DR spell,
Daevryn,
26-May-09 10:55 AM, #6
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Danis (Guest),
26-May-09 10:50 AM, #2
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 12:17 PM, #11
RE: Aura/Shield/Barrier...suggest a new system,
Danis (Guest),
26-May-09 03:29 PM, #27
Not precisely a new system, but one idea I read and lik...,
EXB_ (Guest),
26-May-09 10:50 AM, #1
RE: Not precisely a new system, but one idea I read and...,
Daevryn,
26-May-09 10:51 AM, #5
Honestly,
Guy (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #81
Further fleshing out,
Guy (Guest),
28-May-09 01:45 PM, #90
Rewarding long-lived characters,
Zulghinlour,
26-May-09 12:09 PM, #10
However,
EXB_ (Guest),
26-May-09 12:56 PM, #15
RE: Rewarding long-lived characters,
Ayalah (Guest),
28-May-09 10:20 AM, #82
RE: Rewarding long-lived characters,
Zulghinlour,
28-May-09 02:49 PM, #93
Tie it to exp/obs xp. nt,
DurNominator,
30-May-09 10:52 AM, #121
| |
|