>>Don't - write a role of lists.
>
>I thought that writing a list with a few characteristics/goals
>or events in the past are better then no role at all.

I don't mind roles of this form, unless I'm misunderstanding what Eshval meant. Unsurprisingly, different imms like different stuff and pick different kinds of things to win. For example, in our contest in January I tried to give extra credit to roles that people were playing the hell out of in the game, whereas I know other RC judges have been less concerned about that and focus only on the role without regard to other factors.

We're all picking out quality, just in different ways. It's one of the reasons we're trying to rotate who runs these things, to give a lot of different styles of great roles a chance to win.