Go back to previous topic
Forum Name The Battlefield
Topic subjectRE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift Stroke of Death, Drillmistress of Battle
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=81460&mesg_id=81637
81637, RE: (AGE DEATH) [BATTLE] Susubienko Glomska the Swift Stroke of Death, Drillmistress of Battle
Posted by Susu on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
>I'll say this..I liked Susubienko. And hated her more. She
>had many good points and an equal amount of, if not more, bad
>points.
>

Huh. Ok, let's hear them....

>First up, good work on getting so involved with Thror's return
>quest. You were one of the most enthusiastic and driven chars
>that did research, inquiry and exploration overtime, even when
>no one was there to praise or see.
>

Thanks. I'm sure I'm like most people, quests are part of why we play cf, it's good stuff.

>You also took whatever we talked about religion wise and tried
>to right the wrongs, enhance the rights, just about after
>every conversation. It was obvious you stuck it out, tried
>your best and did a good job in that aspect.
>

Thanks again. I was gratified by your post on my pbf about talking to Lohik that I did indeed get the religion.

>You played a hardline Drillmistress, which is cool by me. DMs
>of all people, don't have to sugarcoat or be nice. You
>organised nifty events and tried to do things a DM should
>do..all of which get the thumbs up from me. You did however,
>step on many of your own cabalmates' toes. I'm not speaking
>about tough policy or action, but more of just snubbing them
>entirely to the point of disrespect or disregard..which isn't
>cool.
>

Thanks for the first half, and ok, tell me more about the second half, please? Especially in the second half of her life, other than a few instances of simply not hearing something on cb or said to me because of spam or something going on occ (see: Raewol), I'm honestly not sure what you saw that went so far as to be real disrespect and disregard and snubbing of cabalmates. Maybe I'm oblivious to it? Maybe it's unintentional and a lack of tone in text? I don't know, but if you're willing to give me some examples, I will gladly try to prevent it in the future.

>Also, from the way you make it sound..I never promised you any
>con. I simply said I'd see what I could do..I would prolly
>have quested you once you heroed or something. So that note to
>all the immortals stating I was supposed to be giving you that
>was annoying to say the least.

I haven't been able to find the log of our talk, so we can't just look at it and know, but my recollection was that you did. If I was mistaken, then I'm sorry. Also, just fyi, the point of her asking, as I think I actually said to you, was to get some con *before* heroing, so that I wouldn't get such crappy gains at each level. So saying you might have done it once I hero'ed sorta defeats the purpose. I wasn't drillmistress at the time, remember.

>
>Anyhow, it was a love-hate relationship with Susu for me. Not
>my fav char, but I thought you did a pretty good job overall.

So from this post the only ic thing you said that was a negative was the snubbing or disregarding, everything else was good, at least that you wrote here. That can only mean that much of the things that lead you to say what you said up top, that there was more bad than good, are ooc. Or that you're holding back on ic things I suppose. I'm not sure how to take that but it certainly doesn't bode well.

I hope I'm wrong about that.

Thanks for posting.