 |
 Color icons
indicate new message |
Pages 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 135 |
|
| Topics in this discussion:
Sorted by last modified date |
| ID |
Discussion topic |
Author |
Last updated date | Views |
 |
Gameplay Forum Rules | Zulghinlour | Sun 22-Nov-09 07:51 PM | 154 |
|
How can I chip in as a player? | Valguarnera | Sat 30-Jun-07 12:04 PM | 1706 |
|
FAQ: How to apply to the staff (updated 5/28/07) | Valguarnera | Mon 28-May-07 09:34 PM | 1460 |
 |
Wise Recovery and avian healing edges. [ View all ] | Pro | Mon 06-Sep-10 10:30 PM | 53 |
  RE: Wise Recovery and avian healing edges.,
Daevryn,
06-Sep-10 05:35 PM, #1
Con based saves.,
Pro,
06-Sep-10 05:58 PM, #2
RE: Con based saves.,
Daevryn,
06-Sep-10 07:02 PM, #3
Doesn't that seem kinda crappy?,
Pro,
06-Sep-10 10:30 PM, #4
| |
Hero Dwarves. [ View all ] | Pro | Mon 06-Sep-10 08:30 AM | 126 |
 Wise Recovery n/t,
Homard,
05-Sep-10 11:07 PM, #3
 Dwarves can't get this can they?,
Pro,
06-Sep-10 01:56 AM, #4
Yes, Dwarves can take this edge.,
Homard,
06-Sep-10 08:30 AM, #5
Its not like + con gear doesn't exist at hero Pro nt,
Drag0nSt0rm,
05-Sep-10 02:38 PM, #1
Think deeper thoughts. n/t,
Pro,
05-Sep-10 02:57 PM, #2
| |
Anonymous posts [ View all ] | Zulghinlour | Sun 05-Sep-10 04:23 PM | 216 |
Fixed a handful, thanks for the mails,
Zulghinlour,
03-Sep-10 01:53 PM, #4
You're the man Zulg, as always, Thanks a ton for all yo...,
N b M,
03-Sep-10 02:46 PM, #5
I checked a few anon posts,
DurNominator,
05-Sep-10 03:19 PM, #6
RE: I checked a few anon posts,
AnonTest (Anonymous),
05-Sep-10 04:17 PM, #7
RE: I checked a few anon posts,
Isildur,
05-Sep-10 04:23 PM, #9
I sent you e-mail. nt,
DurNominator,
02-Sep-10 10:54 AM, #3
RE: I sent you e-mail. nt,
testtwo (Anonymous),
05-Sep-10 04:21 PM, #8
Edited: I realized what's wrong... I need to find out a...,
Amberion,
02-Sep-10 05:40 AM, #1
Removed for ya (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
02-Sep-10 10:09 AM, #2
| |
Couple Ranger questions, maybe a few. [ View all ] | Pro | Sun 05-Sep-10 12:08 PM | 131 |
Hero wood-elf staff,
Theerkla,
04-Sep-10 07:51 PM, #6
Are you sure this is right...? nt,
sleepy,
05-Sep-10 05:49 AM, #7
Anyone have a ID of other race Hero Staffs?,
Pro,
05-Sep-10 12:08 PM, #8
RE: Couple Ranger questions, maybe a few.,
Trouble,
04-Sep-10 01:54 PM, #2
Thanks. n/t,
Pro,
04-Sep-10 02:17 PM, #4
RE: Couple Ranger questions, maybe a few.,
Isildur,
04-Sep-10 07:43 PM, #5
RE: Couple Ranger questions, maybe a few.,
incognito,
04-Sep-10 01:40 PM, #1
Thanks. n/t,
Pro,
04-Sep-10 02:17 PM, #3
| |
Metabolic quickening & appetite [ View all ] | Theerkla | Sat 04-Sep-10 01:38 PM | 83 |
umm haste/met quick makes you hungry faster slow/met sl...,
laxman,
04-Sep-10 07:30 AM, #1
RE: umm haste/met quick makes you hungry faster slow/me...,
Theerkla,
04-Sep-10 07:49 AM, #2
RE: umm haste/met quick makes you hungry faster slow/me...,
incognito,
04-Sep-10 01:38 PM, #3
| |
Deathblow Question (s) [ View all ] | Treebeard | Thu 02-Sep-10 10:04 PM | 225 |
Being a rager monkey..,
Marcus_,
28-Aug-10 03:58 PM, #1
Just to test something. nt,
Pentest (Anonymous),
30-Aug-10 09:12 AM, #2
That helps.,
DurNominator,
02-Sep-10 11:05 AM, #3
hehe,
Marcus_,
02-Sep-10 07:00 PM, #4
I just figured out four new ways to identify the poster...,
DurNominator,
02-Sep-10 10:04 PM, #5
|  |
Again, I say: [ View all ] | Stunna | Thu 02-Sep-10 12:17 AM | 547 |
is it only a lack of vision?,
vorian,
22-Aug-10 04:07 PM, #71
RE: is it only a lack of vision?,
Isildur,
22-Aug-10 04:33 PM, #72
Imms are too soft.,
Shapa,
19-Aug-10 09:26 PM, #43
FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention),
Larcat,
19-Aug-10 04:38 PM, #29
RE: FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention),
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 06:21 PM, #32
RE: FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention),
Larcat,
19-Aug-10 11:41 PM, #51
Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Valguarnera,
18-Aug-10 10:48 PM, #1
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
HammerSong,
18-Aug-10 11:43 PM, #2
My Take (really long; read at your own discretion),
Thinhallen,
19-Aug-10 04:56 AM, #4
RE: My Take (really long; read at your own discretion),
HammerSong,
19-Aug-10 06:42 PM, #34
:),
trewyn,
21-Aug-10 12:51 AM, #67
"the time between the fun and not fun is too big",
Thinhallen,
21-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #68
RE: ,
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:46 PM, #69
Good post, one point.,
A2,
20-Aug-10 03:09 AM, #53
like (n/t) (meant to be under Valg's post)*,
Nnaeshuk,
19-Aug-10 12:24 PM, #13
Great post.,
Asthiss,
19-Aug-10 02:07 AM, #3
Thanks for the link inside.,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:38 AM, #5
I think at this point...,
vargal,
19-Aug-10 06:54 AM, #6
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Jhyrbian,
19-Aug-10 08:36 AM, #7
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 09:04 AM, #8
Well said,
Torak,
19-Aug-10 12:37 PM, #14
Nope. 2003.,
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 05:46 PM, #30
Ah~,
Torak,
19-Aug-10 07:43 PM, #39
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 12:44 PM, #15
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
ORB,
19-Aug-10 12:55 PM, #16
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:35 PM, #19
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
A2,
20-Aug-10 03:17 AM, #54
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
20-Aug-10 08:02 AM, #61
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
A2,
20-Aug-10 12:05 PM, #63
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
20-Aug-10 01:10 PM, #64
There's a lot going on in this thread,
A2,
20-Aug-10 05:57 PM, #65
I disagree that it's dogma.,
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 06:02 PM, #31
Removed my southwest discussion, off topic. n/t,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 10:03 PM, #46
As someone who has worked in several restaurants...,
TMNS,
20-Aug-10 12:17 AM, #52
Talk about inflated ego.,
_Magus_,
19-Aug-10 02:32 PM, #26
Umm...,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 08:34 PM, #41
RE: Umm...,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 09:52 PM, #47
Yup NT,
Lyristeon,
20-Aug-10 07:23 AM, #59
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Zulghinlour,
19-Aug-10 01:05 PM, #17
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:49 PM, #18
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 01:56 PM, #20
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 02:38 PM, #22
It goes both ways,
Torak,
19-Aug-10 02:19 PM, #25
RE: It goes both ways,
Daevryn,
19-Aug-10 07:24 PM, #36
Well...,
Torak,
19-Aug-10 07:43 PM, #38
RE: Well...,
Daevryn,
19-Aug-10 08:02 PM, #40
As someone you've talked to ooc about mechanics,
Stunna,
20-Aug-10 06:04 PM, #66
Good post, probably. n/t,
Stunna,
19-Aug-10 02:25 PM, #27
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
A2,
20-Aug-10 03:24 AM, #55
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Lyristeon,
20-Aug-10 07:33 AM, #60
<3,
Torak,
19-Aug-10 01:57 PM, #21
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 06:33 PM, #33
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 09:39 PM, #45
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Daevryn,
19-Aug-10 07:26 PM, #37
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 09:31 PM, #44
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Daevryn,
19-Aug-10 11:23 PM, #50
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
20-Aug-10 08:35 AM, #62
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:51 PM, #70
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Zulghinlour,
19-Aug-10 09:34 PM, #42
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 10:01 PM, #48
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
A2,
20-Aug-10 03:32 AM, #56
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Stunna,
19-Aug-10 02:10 PM, #24
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 10:10 PM, #49
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
ORB,
19-Aug-10 09:22 AM, #9
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
A2,
20-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #57
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
ORB,
20-Aug-10 07:05 AM, #58
Newbie Channel pt2.,
Kalageadon,
19-Aug-10 10:19 AM, #10
Good post,
MoetEtChandon,
19-Aug-10 12:01 PM, #11
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Malakhi,
19-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #12
Wow, thanks for writing out what I was thinking! Hopefu...,
Stunna,
19-Aug-10 02:06 PM, #23
Party analogy,
Quixotic,
19-Aug-10 04:28 PM, #28
RE: Party analogy,
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 06:56 PM, #35
RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long),
Vintus (Anonymous),
02-Sep-10 12:17 AM, #73
| |
Badass (Illusionary) wielders [ View all ] | blackbird | Wed 01-Sep-10 07:14 PM | 236 |
The ruins is fine. Just sac the weapons you disarm.,
Gaplemo,
01-Sep-10 11:55 AM, #5
RE: The ruins is fine. Just sac the weapons you disarm.,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 02:22 PM, #6
Pretty sure illusionary weapons can't be disarmed or fu...,
Lhydia,
01-Sep-10 03:37 PM, #7
This nt,
Drag0nSt0rm,
01-Sep-10 03:42 PM, #8
Allow me to spell it out for you,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 06:07 PM, #9
Thanks beautiful. n/t,
Lhydia,
01-Sep-10 07:14 PM, #10
I have been with a few groups to the ruins of the deep ...,
dude,
31-Aug-10 09:13 PM, #3
RE: I have been with a few groups to the ruins of the d...,
MRSK,
01-Sep-10 09:21 AM, #4
Solution,
Drag0nSt0rm,
31-Aug-10 08:50 PM, #2
Cosign,
ORB,
31-Aug-10 03:52 PM, #1
| |
Grief [ View all ] | Beer | Wed 01-Sep-10 06:36 PM | 199 |
Have never seen that happen,
Marcus_ (NOT Marcus),
01-Sep-10 02:33 PM, #7
If I have to do this...,
Beer,
01-Sep-10 05:01 PM, #10
Tips,
Quixotic,
01-Sep-10 11:32 AM, #3
If the answer is Quit...,
vargal,
01-Sep-10 04:36 PM, #8
Bingo,
Beer,
01-Sep-10 05:01 PM, #9
I'm giving honest answers.,
Quixotic,
01-Sep-10 05:05 PM, #11
RE: I'm giving honest answers.,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 05:37 PM, #12
RE: Grief,
Asthiss,
01-Sep-10 02:59 AM, #1
RE: Grief,
Beer,
01-Sep-10 09:58 AM, #2
RE: Grief,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 01:41 PM, #4
RE: Grief,
Isildur,
01-Sep-10 01:58 PM, #5
RE: Grief,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 02:21 PM, #6
RE: Grief,
Isildur,
01-Sep-10 06:03 PM, #13
RE: Grief,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 06:36 PM, #14
| |
Goodie RP Question [ View all ] | Welverin | Wed 01-Sep-10 05:35 PM | 79 |
RE: Goodie RP Question,
incognito,
01-Sep-10 05:35 PM, #2
RE: Goodie RP Question,
Isildur,
01-Sep-10 08:14 AM, #1
| |
Mailed Templar edge questions [ View all ] | Paladin (Anonymous) | Mon 30-Aug-10 06:41 PM | 135 |
RE: Mailed Templar edge questions,
Daevryn,
30-Aug-10 06:41 PM, #1
| |
IMM Forums [ View all ] | dude | Sat 28-Aug-10 05:57 PM | 146 |
RE: IMM Forums,
Nnaeshuk,
28-Aug-10 05:57 PM, #1
| |
Some questions about picking locks [ View all ] | Nightgaunt_ | Fri 27-Aug-10 11:07 PM | 165 |
RE: Some questions about picking locks,
Daevryn,
26-Aug-10 06:18 PM, #1
about which new locks you can pick,
dude,
27-Aug-10 07:17 PM, #2
RE: Some questions about picking locks,
Zulghinlour,
27-Aug-10 11:07 PM, #3
| |
Special events - it will help to advert CF [ View all ] | Dervish | Fri 27-Aug-10 01:58 PM | 167 |
RE: Special events - it will help to advert CF,
Lyristeon,
27-Aug-10 10:06 AM, #1
Thats great!,
Gaplemo,
27-Aug-10 01:58 PM, #2
| |
Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment [ View all ] | Habbs | Thu 26-Aug-10 05:01 PM | 376 |
RE: Adekar - Sword of the Heavens PBF Comment,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 05:45 PM, #1
*blush* I should have said according to the diku wiki i...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 06:06 PM, #2
I don't get it. You take the edge and get better angels...,
Lhydia,
24-Aug-10 06:17 PM, #3
this (n/t),
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 06:27 PM, #4
<3 n/t,
Lhydia,
24-Aug-10 07:04 PM, #5
I would initially call BS if that is all it is supposed...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 08:10 PM, #6
RE: I would initially call BS if that is all it is supp...,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 08:23 PM, #7
So does sword of the heavens, celestial affinity, and t...,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 08:25 PM, #8
Nope.,
Daevryn,
24-Aug-10 08:34 PM, #9
Always?,
Habbs,
24-Aug-10 09:46 PM, #10
With my last goodie conjie...,
Tac,
25-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #11
Same thing I saw,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 10:27 AM, #12
Also, a question for you,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 10:36 AM, #13
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 12:41 PM, #14
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Tac,
25-Aug-10 01:03 PM, #15
Thanks,
Habbs,
25-Aug-10 03:53 PM, #16
RE: Thanks,
Adekar,
25-Aug-10 07:46 PM, #23
RE: Thanks,
Habbs,
26-Aug-10 10:32 AM, #29
LOL, I found some logs, and I was with you when you ran...,
Habbs,
26-Aug-10 05:01 PM, #31
then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
laxman,
25-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #17
RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 05:12 PM, #18
Nope. :),
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #19
RE: Nope. :),
Tac,
26-Aug-10 11:06 AM, #30
RE: then Nep has never seriously played a conjurer,
Hutto,
26-Aug-10 12:07 AM, #28
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 06:36 PM, #20
So time constraints aside....,
Gaplemo,
25-Aug-10 07:36 PM, #21
RE: So time constraints aside....,
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #24
Thanks for the clarification!,
Gaplemo,
25-Aug-10 08:51 PM, #26
bear in mind,
laxman,
25-Aug-10 09:02 PM, #27
RE: With my last goodie conjie...,
Isildur,
25-Aug-10 07:41 PM, #22
Correct. (n/t),
Daevryn,
25-Aug-10 08:35 PM, #25
| |
question for team macalla [ View all ] | Isildur | Thu 26-Aug-10 03:53 AM | 290 |
RE: question for team macalla,
coconut,
26-Aug-10 03:53 AM, #10
RE: question for team macalla,
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:41 PM, #1
RE: question for team macalla,
Isildur,
21-Aug-10 09:34 PM, #2
He did, and that's the post where he said he..,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 03:20 AM, #3
RE: question for team macalla,
Daevryn,
22-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #4
RE: question for team macalla,
Isildur,
22-Aug-10 09:44 AM, #9
RE: question for team macalla,
Humbert,
22-Aug-10 02:26 PM, #5
It does not fire offense. n/t,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 05:19 PM, #7
RE: It does not fire offense. n/t,
Isildur,
22-Aug-10 06:29 PM, #8
Ad Nauseum on Fires.,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 05:18 PM, #6
| |
Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF. [ View all ] | anti | Wed 25-Aug-10 11:55 PM | 320 |
Keeping it civil,
incognito,
25-Aug-10 06:33 PM, #58
Just for completeness: No.,
Valguarnera,
25-Aug-10 06:55 AM, #53
just to nitpick,
laxman,
25-Aug-10 07:22 AM, #56
RE: just to nitpick,
anti,
25-Aug-10 11:28 PM, #59
A different take...how about premium accounts,
Minyar,
25-Aug-10 01:54 PM, #57
CF is a ROM/DIKU derivative. Read the ROM/DIKU license....,
Quixotic,
24-Aug-10 04:40 PM, #48
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
wareagle,
23-Aug-10 06:38 PM, #38
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
anti,
24-Aug-10 01:11 AM, #39
I think its safe to say most of the player and staff do...,
Gaplemo,
24-Aug-10 06:39 AM, #44
Source code, not areas.,
Valguarnera,
25-Aug-10 06:50 AM, #52
Isn't Commercialism/Consumerism being forced upon us qu...,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 06:16 PM, #37
One foundation of CF...Everything in game is free (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
23-Aug-10 04:36 PM, #27
Why PBF isn't then? nt,
anti,
23-Aug-10 05:56 PM, #31
Specifically: Everything IN game is free. nt,
vargal,
23-Aug-10 05:59 PM, #32
Okay. Premium account may be 100% out of the game.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 06:02 PM, #33
RE: Okay. Premium account may be 100% out of the game.,
Lyristeon,
24-Aug-10 09:14 AM, #46
I hate this.,
Batman,
23-Aug-10 04:29 PM, #22
RE: I hate this.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 04:36 PM, #26
If you want to kill cf, this is the way to do it,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 03:39 PM, #16
do not want.,
Isildur,
23-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #15
Pay for perk games suck.,
lasentia,
24-Aug-10 05:12 PM, #49
RE: Pay for perk games suck.,
anti,
25-Aug-10 01:46 AM, #50
RE: Pay for perk games suck.,
DurNominator,
25-Aug-10 02:37 AM, #51
No.,
Twist,
23-Aug-10 03:19 PM, #12
Why?,
anti,
23-Aug-10 03:21 PM, #14
On CF, rewards are handed out to those that deserve and...,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 04:13 PM, #20
RE: On CF, rewards are handed out to those that deserve...,
anti,
23-Aug-10 04:27 PM, #21
Somehow I find this hard to believe. nt,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 04:32 PM, #23
You are entitled to your opinion.,
Lyristeon,
24-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #54
This hits the nail on the head. NT,
Lyristeon,
24-Aug-10 09:11 AM, #45
No.,
Stevers,
23-Aug-10 02:58 PM, #8
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
DurNominator,
23-Aug-10 02:10 PM, #6
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 03:08 PM, #11
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
DurNominator,
23-Aug-10 06:15 PM, #36
Love that idea.,
Batman,
23-Aug-10 04:33 PM, #24
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
sorlag,
23-Aug-10 01:42 PM, #5
Premium account have nothing to do with such licenses. ...,
anti,
23-Aug-10 03:04 PM, #9
RE: Premium account have nothing to do with such licens...,
sorlag,
23-Aug-10 03:50 PM, #17
I do think there might be something here, though....,
Tac,
23-Aug-10 01:16 PM, #4
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
Lyristeon,
23-Aug-10 11:52 AM, #2
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 12:02 PM, #3
That's not the thing Anti...,
Amberion,
23-Aug-10 02:57 PM, #7
RE: That's not the thing Anti...,
anti,
23-Aug-10 03:06 PM, #10
If I wanted to play a pay game I would go back to Wow o...,
Gaplemo,
23-Aug-10 03:20 PM, #13
RE: If I wanted to play a pay game I would go back to W...,
anti,
23-Aug-10 03:56 PM, #18
Do you have any idea how many donations people have don...,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 04:10 PM, #19
Funny.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 04:34 PM, #25
The really funny thing is: Money has NEVER been the goa...,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 04:37 PM, #28
RE: The really funny thing is: Money has NEVER been the...,
anti,
23-Aug-10 05:54 PM, #30
It's a HOBBY,
MoetEtChandon,
23-Aug-10 06:11 PM, #35
It's a lot more than that. It's lifetime amd it's a wor...,
anti,
24-Aug-10 01:14 AM, #40
Hey, I didn't say I would mind paying for CF, what I di...,
Amberion,
24-Aug-10 02:14 AM, #41
On a side note though about your idea....,
Amberion,
24-Aug-10 02:19 AM, #42
Of course, I agree with you here.,
anti,
24-Aug-10 03:22 AM, #43
No way. Is it something I like to do? Sure,
MoetEtChandon,
24-Aug-10 10:51 AM, #47
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
Daevryn,
23-Aug-10 05:39 PM, #29
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
anti,
23-Aug-10 05:51 PM, #55
RE: Premium accounts - it will help to advert CF.,
Daevryn,
23-Aug-10 06:06 PM, #34
Why does anyone think money will fix the problem~,
Torak,
23-Aug-10 11:33 AM, #1
Soccer Hooligan style "BOOOO!",
SideStrider,
25-Aug-10 11:55 PM, #60
| |
Browser-based applet [ View all ] | Splntrd | Tue 24-Aug-10 10:50 AM | 51 |
It works fine for me nt,
SuperIsisMan,
24-Aug-10 10:43 AM, #1
Oh, it's working now.,
Splntrd,
24-Aug-10 10:50 AM, #2
| |
Request for a very simple, but useful thing. [ View all ] | anti | Mon 23-Aug-10 05:36 PM | 185 |
Actually, it's quite easy....,
Amberion,
23-Aug-10 04:38 AM, #1
RE: Actually, it's quite easy....,
anti,
23-Aug-10 05:01 AM, #2
I don't get what you're wondering.,
Batman,
23-Aug-10 04:28 PM, #3
RE: Actually, it's quite easy....,
Daevryn,
23-Aug-10 05:36 PM, #4
| |
Balanced percussionist [ View all ] | N b M | Sun 22-Aug-10 10:46 PM | 147 |
RE: Balanced percussionist,
Daevryn,
22-Aug-10 10:46 PM, #1
| |
Wrathav Elves better at it? [ View all ] | Pro | Sun 22-Aug-10 03:22 AM | 176 |
RE: Wrathav Elves better at it?,
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:42 PM, #1
That makes sense. Thanks. n/t,
Pro,
22-Aug-10 03:22 AM, #2
| |
Imm Playtimes [ View all ] | Lokain | Sat 21-Aug-10 08:47 PM | 160 |
RE: Imm Playtimes,
Daevryn,
21-Aug-10 08:47 PM, #9
RE: Imm Playtimes,
Enlilth,
21-Aug-10 11:44 AM, #7
7PM-10PM System time. NT,
Lyristeon,
21-Aug-10 09:56 AM, #4
RE: Imm Playtimes,
Iunna,
21-Aug-10 08:56 AM, #3
RE: Imm Playtimes,
Splntrd,
20-Aug-10 09:19 PM, #1
Seconded.,
Kalageadon,
21-Aug-10 05:18 AM, #2
Meh,
Lokain,
21-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #5
RE: Meh,
Isildur,
21-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #6
I know...,
Lokain,
21-Aug-10 01:43 PM, #8
| |
Cabal Wars Enhancement Idea [ View all ] | laxman | Sat 21-Aug-10 01:31 AM | 143 |
Need more people to participate ,
ORB,
20-Aug-10 12:05 PM, #2
RE: Need more people to participate ,
Kalageadon,
20-Aug-10 12:55 PM, #3
RE: Need more people to participate ,
ORB,
20-Aug-10 01:33 PM, #4
RE: Need more people to participate ,
Kalageadon,
20-Aug-10 01:46 PM, #5
Sounds like POS to me.,
wareagle,
21-Aug-10 01:31 AM, #8
RE: Need more people to participate ,
wareagle,
21-Aug-10 01:23 AM, #7
The problem with easy-in, easy-out.,
sorlag,
20-Aug-10 01:55 PM, #6
RE: Cabal Wars Enhancement Idea,
Eskelian,
20-Aug-10 10:17 AM, #1
| |
Oh noes, Here I goes... again. [ View all ] | Stunna | Thu 19-Aug-10 06:48 PM | 159 |
Hierarchy vs. consensus: ,
Valguarnera,
19-Aug-10 06:48 PM, #1
| |
Just a question. Does anyone think that CF is too much ... [ View all ] | Pro | Thu 19-Aug-10 04:45 PM | 540 |
Rewards should stop, here is why:,
Larcat,
19-Aug-10 04:45 PM, #76
Obviously 90% of the people RP for the rewards.,
Shapa,
16-Aug-10 10:58 AM, #73
It would be interesting to see what would happen with R...,
Shapa,
16-Aug-10 11:12 AM, #74
This is the opposite direction I'd like to see CF go,
Swordsosaurus,
16-Aug-10 03:27 PM, #75
My 2 cents and solution,
Gaplemo,
03-Aug-10 04:09 PM, #48
RE: My 2 cents and solution,
sorlag,
03-Aug-10 04:56 PM, #50
Good post. n/t,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 04:52 PM, #52
Definitely cosign.,
sleepy,
03-Aug-10 04:56 PM, #54
good post. n/t,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 04:52 PM, #53
RE: Just a question. Does anyone think that CF is too m...,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:48 PM, #40
IMM Rewards,
wareagle,
03-Aug-10 02:08 AM, #21
RE: IMM Rewards,
Daevryn,
03-Aug-10 07:34 AM, #24
I totally understand your stance,
bobbyp,
03-Aug-10 09:13 AM, #25
RE: I totally understand your stance,
Rayihn,
03-Aug-10 10:36 AM, #26
RE: I totally understand your stance,
sorlag,
03-Aug-10 11:03 AM, #27
RE: I totally understand your stance,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 11:54 AM, #32
Yeah, I'm liking that. (nt),
sorlag,
03-Aug-10 12:57 PM, #35
If they were further apart,
Artificial,
03-Aug-10 11:09 AM, #28
the problem with role contest rewards,
laxman,
03-Aug-10 11:09 AM, #29
and don't take this as please don't do RC rewards,
laxman,
03-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #30
RE: the problem with role contest rewards,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #33
Perhaps.,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #34
RE: Perhaps.,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 07:33 PM, #60
i have on many occasions.,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 09:28 PM, #64
RE: the problem with role contest rewards,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:53 PM, #43
Yeah, that's it. Too much extra stuff.,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 01:17 PM, #36
Silly Pro,
Rayihn,
03-Aug-10 01:22 PM, #37
Good. Because you are the only Imm that's given me an R...,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 02:44 PM, #38
meh, people usually delete fast enough that it's not a ...,
blackbird,
03-Aug-10 03:45 PM, #39
I'd say,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:52 PM, #42
I like this. n/t,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 04:39 PM, #49
RE: I'd say,
Daevryn,
03-Aug-10 05:28 PM, #55
RE: I'd say,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 08:49 PM, #63
RE: I totally understand your stance,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 11:53 AM, #31
RE: I totally understand your stance,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:55 PM, #44
RE: I totally understand your stance,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 07:32 PM, #59
And put another way,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:50 PM, #41
I don't know what your or any other Imms criteria are f...,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 04:47 PM, #51
RE: IMM Rewards,
wareagle,
03-Aug-10 05:39 PM, #56
RE: IMM Rewards,
Daevryn,
03-Aug-10 05:53 PM, #57
Why watch when you could interact?,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 06:16 PM, #58
RE: Why watch when you could interact?,
Isildur,
03-Aug-10 07:34 PM, #61
So?,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 09:38 PM, #65
RE: So?,
Isildur,
04-Aug-10 12:08 AM, #67
Gotcha.,
Pro,
04-Aug-10 03:13 PM, #68
Why would somebody be interested in using emotes or wha...,
Rodriguez,
05-Aug-10 09:35 AM, #70
I played a shifter that had 250 hrs and not a single IM...,
TMNS,
03-Aug-10 08:30 PM, #62
RE: I played a shifter that had 250 hrs and not a singl...,
wareagle,
05-Aug-10 03:32 AM, #69
Actually.. I forgot, I had a shifter that got a ton (Fo...,
Pro,
05-Aug-10 01:06 PM, #71
The way I look at it. . . (no being mean I promise),
dwimmerling,
02-Aug-10 08:49 PM, #20
RE: The way I look at it. . . (no being mean I promise),
wareagle,
03-Aug-10 02:33 AM, #23
It's also a retarded measure.,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:58 PM, #45
RE: Just a question. Does anyone think that CF is too m...,
Isildur,
01-Aug-10 10:37 PM, #11
Back the Truck up...,
Pro,
02-Aug-10 08:52 AM, #12
I'll get over you...,
Splntrd,
02-Aug-10 09:55 AM, #13
You have been a little much lately,
bobbyp,
02-Aug-10 10:15 AM, #14
I simply asked a question.,
Pro,
02-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #15
My posts generate plenty of good debate....,
Lhydia,
02-Aug-10 03:46 PM, #19
RE: Back the Truck up...,
Isildur,
02-Aug-10 12:01 PM, #16
I've had 3 Thror followers.,
Pro,
02-Aug-10 01:51 PM, #18
sissy, sally-la-la drama queen.~,
blackbird,
02-Aug-10 12:41 PM, #17
Is a perk essential,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 03:59 PM, #46
Where do people come up with this ####?,
Pro,
03-Aug-10 09:40 PM, #66
Not at all.,
Homard,
01-Aug-10 04:58 PM, #2
You are comparing RL lessons to CF which is a game.,
Pro,
01-Aug-10 06:14 PM, #3
Players leaving because of not getting rewarded?,
Homard,
01-Aug-10 06:25 PM, #4
I long ago have decided I have something in an IP addre...,
Pro,
01-Aug-10 06:58 PM, #5
So, just to be clear...,
Homard,
01-Aug-10 07:12 PM, #6
I didn't even remotely say that.,
Pro,
01-Aug-10 07:59 PM, #7
You misread me.,
Homard,
01-Aug-10 08:05 PM, #8
I was pretty succinct in what I wrote in the initial po...,
Pro,
01-Aug-10 09:07 PM, #9
You're splitting hairs.,
Splntrd,
01-Aug-10 10:22 PM, #10
RE: Not at all.,
wareagle,
03-Aug-10 02:28 AM, #22
Seconded,
incognito,
03-Aug-10 04:01 PM, #47
RE: Not at all.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #72
RE: Just a question. Does anyone think that CF is too m...,
sorlag,
01-Aug-10 04:53 PM, #1
| |
Are Arials to good in to many ways? [ View all ] | Pro | Thu 19-Aug-10 04:41 PM | 291 |
Maybe but..,
Elerosse,
16-Aug-10 09:07 PM, #15
No they just made dex too good over str.,
ORB,
16-Aug-10 08:55 AM, #10
Nah. They have a 250 penalty. Seems about right.,
TMNS,
16-Aug-10 04:02 AM, #8
Are there things you do like about CF? ,
Kalageadon,
16-Aug-10 01:27 AM, #6
The top10 pk argument is weak for one reason.,
TMNS,
16-Aug-10 03:59 AM, #7
Everyone has an opinion. st,
Kalageadon,
16-Aug-10 05:54 AM, #9
RE: The top10 pk argument is weak for one reason.,
Malakhi,
16-Aug-10 11:39 AM, #11
RE: The top10 pk argument is weak for one reason.,
Eskelian,
16-Aug-10 08:24 PM, #14
RE: The top10 pk argument is weak for one reason.,
Kalageadon,
17-Aug-10 04:36 AM, #16
RE: The top10 pk argument is weak for one reason.,
Eskelian,
17-Aug-10 08:36 AM, #19
I don't get why you think immunity vs trip is so awesom...,
blackbird,
17-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #21
No more INT for Arials, please,
Swordsosaurus,
17-Aug-10 05:13 PM, #24
RE: elves,
Malakhi,
17-Aug-10 01:05 PM, #22
FWIW --- Balrahd and Withered arial shaman.,
Larcat,
19-Aug-10 04:41 PM, #27
Ckath ate quite a few withers and...,
Amberion,
17-Aug-10 04:48 AM, #17
Wither does, but,
incognito,
17-Aug-10 01:23 PM, #23
RE: Ckath ate quite a few withers and...,
DurNominator,
17-Aug-10 07:45 PM, #26
Speaking of projecting....,
Pro,
16-Aug-10 05:32 PM, #13
RE: Are Arials to good in to many ways?,
sorlag,
15-Aug-10 06:57 PM, #3
Really?,
Homard,
15-Aug-10 06:47 PM, #1
RE: Really?,
Eskelian,
15-Aug-10 06:50 PM, #2
Knocking their dex down to 23 would make them a SUCKY h...,
Amberion,
17-Aug-10 04:52 AM, #18
Permaflight means they wouldn't be a sucky human. n/t,
Eskelian,
17-Aug-10 08:37 AM, #20
Jeez, yeah right.,
Guilo,
15-Aug-10 11:43 PM, #4
Alright, I'm convinced.,
Homard,
16-Aug-10 12:26 AM, #5
Plenty of reasons to play elves.,
Scrimbul,
16-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #12
If W-Elves got 25 dex, I would be a happy camper /nt,
Swordsosaurus,
17-Aug-10 05:22 PM, #25
| |
RE: Locked Threads [ View all ] | Splntrd | Thu 19-Aug-10 02:55 PM | 453 |
Bottom line,
Hopelessdwarf,
18-Aug-10 07:21 PM, #79
Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 03:46 PM, #48
Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 04:04 PM, #49
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:10 PM, #50
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 04:37 PM, #56
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:48 PM, #59
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:52 PM, #60
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:00 PM, #62
What you guys should do in this situation..,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 05:06 PM, #64
RE: What you guys should do in this situation..,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 06:01 PM, #70
I don't feel thats entirely accurate.,
Gaplemo,
18-Aug-10 06:42 PM, #73
You're not allowed to enter into this thread.,
sleepy,
19-Aug-10 12:42 AM, #84
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Elerosse,
18-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #72
RE: Summary.,
sorlag,
18-Aug-10 04:13 PM, #51
Well thought out response, I will return mine in kind.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:24 PM, #52
Thuul,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 05:46 PM, #66
RE: Thuul,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:52 PM, #67
My point,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 06:00 PM, #69
I'm pretty sure you already ranted about Thuul,
sleepy,
19-Aug-10 12:44 AM, #85
That wasn't the consensus. n/t,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 03:57 AM, #89
RE: That wasn't the consensus. n/t,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:04 AM, #92
No it wasn't and still isn't. n/t,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #99
RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki...,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:41 PM, #83
RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki...,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #58
Just to point something out...,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:06 AM, #86
I actually had no idea about the title until afterwards...,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:07 PM, #76
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:36 PM, #55
RE: Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:58 PM, #61
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 05:13 PM, #63
RE: Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:58 PM, #68
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 06:07 PM, #71
RE: Summary.,
Hutto,
19-Aug-10 02:28 PM, #97
we're all human and we all make mistakes,
MoetEtChandon,
18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #57
FWIW, I didn't lock it and don't know who did. nt,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #81
To be honest, you're a great IMM but a god-awful poster...,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #78
RE: Summary.,
HammerSong,
18-Aug-10 07:29 PM, #80
Speaking as a newbie...,
defrost,
18-Aug-10 04:20 AM, #22
Define newbie, restraint, polite behavior. n/t,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 10:50 AM, #32
RE: Locked Threads,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 03:29 AM, #20
My reasonable alternative:,
Bubthegreat,
18-Aug-10 03:59 AM, #21
... No.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:52 AM, #31
RE: ... No.,
Bubthegreat,
18-Aug-10 02:04 PM, #40
On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested.,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 08:08 AM, #23
This. nt,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #28
FATALITY n/t,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 01:09 PM, #38
Agreement?,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 01:45 PM, #39
RE: Agreement?,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 02:17 PM, #42
RE: Agreement?,
Isildur,
18-Aug-10 10:33 PM, #82
RE: Agreement?,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:13 AM, #87
RE: Agreement?,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:03 AM, #91
I can't believe how much I don't agree with you these d...,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 03:50 AM, #88
RE: I can't believe how much I don't agree with you the...,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:02 AM, #90
Can't believe I'm defending Pro.,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 08:39 AM, #93
RE: Can't believe I'm defending Pro.,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 09:43 AM, #95
RE: Agreement?,
Malakhi,
19-Aug-10 02:42 PM, #98
RE: On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested.,
Isildur,
18-Aug-10 03:21 PM, #43
Think about this also,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #46
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 08:29 AM, #24
RE: Locked Threads,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 02:09 PM, #41
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #47
Quick thought.,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:00 PM, #75
RE: Locked Threads,
Hutto,
19-Aug-10 02:19 PM, #96
At this point its like a bad marriage..,
Kadsuane,
17-Aug-10 08:38 PM, #17
Bring all the lawyers you want...I'll still get custody...,
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 03:26 PM, #44
Le sigh n/t ,
Kadsuane,
18-Aug-10 05:39 PM, #65
RE: Locked Threads,
Isildur,
17-Aug-10 03:33 PM, #10
Correct on both accounts (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 03:27 PM, #45
Fine we'll go start our own with Hookers and Blackjack!...,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 04:30 PM, #54
Hookers and Blackjack eh?,
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 06:54 PM, #74
RE: Locked Threads,
Nnaeshuk,
17-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #9
Some people just have long toes,
MoetEtChandon,
17-Aug-10 04:47 PM, #12
Totally.,
Guilo,
17-Aug-10 05:22 PM, #13
So duper duper cosign.,
TMNS,
17-Aug-10 07:13 PM, #16
Agreed,
Torak,
17-Aug-10 10:44 PM, #18
RE: Locked Threads,
Hutto,
17-Aug-10 02:29 PM, #8
RE: Locked Threads,
wareagle,
17-Aug-10 01:43 PM, #7
I'm all for locked threads,
incognito,
17-Aug-10 01:29 PM, #5
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Splntrd,
17-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #6
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Anliltuel,
17-Aug-10 05:37 PM, #14
You could just have said it was my posts,
Torak,
17-Aug-10 11:29 PM, #19
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 08:33 AM, #25
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Anliltuel,
18-Aug-10 09:01 AM, #27
You're on crack.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:39 AM, #29
I didn't think it'd be too much trouble...,
Anliltuel,
18-Aug-10 09:49 AM, #30
In retrospect...,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 10:55 AM, #33
You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes.,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #34
You're not helping.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 11:16 AM, #35
RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes...,
Anliltuel,
18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #77
RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes...,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 08:55 AM, #94
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #37
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 08:34 AM, #26
The term 'Champion' is poorly chosen,
MoetEtChandon,
18-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #53
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Pendragon_Surtr,
17-Aug-10 03:43 PM, #11
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
17-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #3
RE: Locked Threads,
HammerSong,
17-Aug-10 06:24 PM, #15
RE: Locked Threads,
flatline,
17-Aug-10 12:27 PM, #1
RE: Locked Threads,
sorlag,
17-Aug-10 12:37 PM, #2
Lyr's response to you was unwarranted.,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 12:49 PM, #36
RE: Locked Threads,
Splntrd,
17-Aug-10 01:19 PM, #4
| |
|
