As it stands now:

--------------------------------------------------------------

You make a successful feint to mislead a storm giant commander.
A storm giant commander is covered with bleeding wounds.

feint
They are already being misled.
A storm giant commander is covered with bleeding wounds.

------------------------------------------------------------------

This can be annoying to say the least. When one attempts a strategy of feint-spamming, it's rudely interrupted. At this point you may consider it a point of conveniance for myself, only, but there is a logical precedent for my stance.

When a fluid deceptions double-feint occurs, the affect carries over until the next round should the enemy only get one attack in the following round. In essence, the feints are stacking in the case of a double-feint, wheras when a manual double-feint is attempted (as illustrated in the above log) the command is not allowed.

>When a fluid deceptions double-feint occurs, the affect
>carries over until the next round should the enemy only get
>one attack in the following round. In essence, the feints are
>stacking in the case of a double-feint, wheras when a manual
>double-feint is attempted (as illustrated in the above log)
>the command is not allowed.

Which is a benefit of the legacy.

The double feints carrying over from previous rounds is a benefit of the legacy.

The auto-feints making mid-round feints impossible is not a benefit of the legacy. It is a(n) (inadvertently) detrimental affect of the legacy's mechanics.

I'm sorry if my post wasn't clear. Your reply seemed to indicate you were confused.


Edit: I may have found the sourc of confusion. That first feint is an automatic result of the legacy, and happened in the middle of the round.

The feint for which the command appears is an inputted command, which could not go through due to the automatic affect.