|
>This wield seems wrong. I would like to see it so that no >matter what you wield, it will go into that wield spot and >remove whatever is in your dual wield if it's not compatable. >Realistically if you want to wield an axe that's lighter why >hold on to that heavier sword in the offhand. > >Is this something that was overlooked? Purposely kept in? Or >just not possible to do? Or none of the above?
It wasn't overlooked, it was a conscious decision, since it seemed for every person who wants it this way, there is someone who wants it the way it is. There isn't a way to get the best of both worlds.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|