Graatch | Tue 13-Dec-11 12:16 AM |
Member since 14th Apr 2010
167 posts
| |
|
#328, "I don't play so my opinion doesn't count. Having said that, I disagree with this change."
|
This is yet another step away from what cf has been - and what should be cherished - and toward world of warcraft. The whole concept of "like that sword? You'll have to kill that guy to get it!" or whatever the phrase is that is listed in the cf description is cheapened yet again. These item breaking skills, few and far between as they were, were part of the gear rotation process; the best example being the stoneform amulet and stoneshatter. But all those weapons the axe spec breaks, or the shifter shattered, etc., were available for someone else to get, perhaps someone not in that person's range who would otherwise never had the opportunity for that item.
I don't get a vote but I think it's a bad idea and I'd change it back.
|
|
|
Santa Zulg changes item destruction
[View all] , Zulghinlour, Sun 11-Dec-11 10:53 PM
My only concern,
Zephon,
13-Dec-11 09:20 PM, #18
RE: My only concern,
Zulghinlour,
13-Dec-11 09:20 PM, #19
Just a thought:,
_Magus_,
14-Dec-11 11:36 PM, #22
I don't play so my opinion doesn't count. Having said t...,
Graatch,
13-Dec-11 01:22 AM #16
RE: I don't play so my opinion doesn't count. Having sa...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Dec-11 01:23 AM, #17
You can't say Graatch doesn't have perspective,
Oldril,
14-Dec-11 11:36 PM, #21
RE: Santa Zulg changes item destruction,
GrahamC,
12-Dec-11 03:58 PM, #12
2 quick questions about this code.....,
Gaplemo,
12-Dec-11 03:54 PM, #8
Neither are changed (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
12-Dec-11 03:56 PM, #11
Does this work on mobs too?,
Gaspar,
12-Dec-11 03:04 PM, #6
Thank you Santa Z, great Christmas gift! n/t,
Obaznuk,
12-Dec-11 03:04 PM, #5
That's.... awesome. Nicely done. nt,
Wayward Knight,
12-Dec-11 03:21 AM, #4
Add-on idea to this,
Straklaw,
12-Dec-11 03:21 AM, #3
In the future you will likely see thigns like this (n/t...,
Zulghinlour,
12-Dec-11 03:55 PM, #10
Curious but...,
Torak,
12-Dec-11 03:21 AM, #2
bleh,
Scarabaeus,
12-Dec-11 03:54 PM, #7
Agreed (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
12-Dec-11 03:54 PM, #9
RE: bleh,
Daevryn,
12-Dec-11 04:02 PM, #13
That combo is OP,
Scrimbul,
13-Dec-11 10:18 PM, #20
Sorry,
Torak,
12-Dec-11 09:58 PM, #14
Compromise?,
fist-law,
12-Dec-11 11:33 PM, #15
Thank you very much for this great change. nt,
Artificial,
11-Dec-11 11:57 PM, #1
| |
|