Subject: "RE: Question about judging the winners" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions History & Lore Topic #357
Show all folders

DaltericFri 18-Nov-05 07:37 AM
Member since 26th Jun 2005
82 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#363, "RE: Question about judging the winners"


          

In judging the role contest, I go purely on the role. While I am more apt to watch someone who has an interesting role (because I want to see the rp in action), it really isn't feasible to do more than that.

By that I mean, I try and run a very tight schedule in terms of the contest. Ideally, I open/announce for one week, and then within three day of closing want to have it decided, and awards given out (so that you wacky kids don't have time to start deleting). If I placed a requirement to supervise all the semi-finalists, I'd probably not be able to sleep/go to work, and in many cases would penalize those who aren't on 6 hours a day since I might not find them before I need my decisions.

That being said, I firmly believe that most people who put effort into a unique and well-written role intend to rp it. So, long story short, just on the role, excluding anything else.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicNovember Role Contest! [View all] , Dalteric, Mon 07-Nov-05 03:30 PM
Reply Finalist & Semi-Finalist Comments, Dalteric, 17-Nov-05 12:36 PM, #3
Reply November Role Contest Winners!, Dalteric, 17-Nov-05 12:36 PM, #2
Reply Question about judging the winners, Theerkla, 17-Nov-05 07:11 PM, #4
Reply RE: Question about judging the winners, Dalteric, 18-Nov-05 07:37 AM #5
Reply RE: November Role Contest Winners!, Sorthian, 26-Nov-05 09:49 AM, #6
     Reply RE: November Role Contest Winners!, Dalteric, 28-Nov-05 10:01 AM, #7
Reply November Role Contest...is Closed!, Dalteric, 17-Nov-05 12:36 PM, #1
Top General Discussions History & Lore Topic #357 Previous topic | Next topic