Subject: "You have two problems here." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #73908
Show all folders

Battle Applicant (Anonymous)Sat 01-Feb-20 08:53 PM
Charter member
#73924, "You have two problems here."


          

The first one is that you continue to assume there are mages to fight. Most of the time, there isn't one logged on in the first place. You also seem to be forgetting the size of the world and that they just don't go visible often or at all. They can level without it. You're just mistaken about that.

But the second is really the real issue which is your logic is wrong on how it should be. Your logic here is that it should be someone who can't see invisible should have to wait until someone comes to fight him. That's just the wrong way of thinking, it should be about whether the applicant can do something. Your way, you've said several times, is dependent on a mage deciding to go fight the applicant. It should be about the applicant going and finding.

As it is, things beyond the applicant's control, and things they by definition cannot effect or overcome, are determinitive. That's ass backwards. Your logic means you could have an applicant never, ever, even find one. Mages could just decide never to go to him. That's not the right outcome.

And again, how does it hurt anyone for a battle applicant to get trusight at 25 like they already do, if they have a kill? They still don't have other powers.

I get the sense you just don't like battle cabal. Maybe. And that's fine. But the change in the game over the last 25 years means the system is broken. Taken 50, 60, 75 hours to get lucky and try and find the one mage who logged on in three days and happened to go visible for 5 seconds is the opposite of a way to keep players.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicProposed Change To Battle Induction Process [View all] , Battle Applicant (Anonymous), Sun 23-Feb-20 12:46 PM
Reply You want to fix the mage problem? , Blkdrgn, 02-Feb-20 11:56 AM, #36
Reply FWIW, Bemused, 01-Feb-20 10:45 PM, #17
Reply RE: FWIW, Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 01-Feb-20 11:35 PM, #19
Reply We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts., SPN, 02-Feb-20 09:07 AM, #30
     Reply RE: We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 11:32 AM, #32
          Reply RE: We are disagreeing that your facts are not facts., SPN, 02-Feb-20 02:54 PM, #38
Reply Wtf..., clnt2020, 02-Feb-20 02:10 AM, #21
Reply RE: Wtf..., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 02:44 AM, #23
     Reply RE: Wtf..., clnt2020, 02-Feb-20 06:33 AM, #28
          Reply RE: Wtf..., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 11:30 AM, #31
               Reply Just get in without a mage kill., lasentia, 03-Feb-20 09:21 AM, #40
                    Reply This is pretty terrible advice., Java, 03-Feb-20 09:28 AM, #42
                         Reply My sarcasm skills need work., lasentia, 03-Feb-20 01:58 PM, #43
                              Reply RE: My sarcasm skills need work., Orbain, 23-Feb-20 04:21 AM, #44
Reply I call B.S., SPN, 02-Feb-20 09:03 AM, #29
Reply Get better at pk., SPN, 01-Feb-20 11:44 AM, #6
Reply PS: I am by no means a great pker., SPN, 01-Feb-20 11:43 AM, #7
Reply RE: Get better at pk., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 01-Feb-20 04:24 PM, #9
     Reply Honestly, lack of detect invis shouldn't be a problem f..., incognito, 01-Feb-20 05:35 PM, #11
     Reply RE: Honestly, lack of detect invis shouldn't be a probl..., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 01-Feb-20 05:49 PM, #12
          Reply So how does giving detect invite help then?, incognito, 02-Feb-20 01:59 AM, #20
               Reply RE: So how does giving detect invite help then?, Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 02:47 AM, #25
                    Reply Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse, incognito, 02-Feb-20 04:39 AM, #26
                         Reply RE: Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse, Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 11:39 AM, #33
                              Reply RE: Pretty sure it isn't me being obtuse, incognito, 02-Feb-20 05:04 PM, #39
     Reply Nobody is misunderstanding you., robdarken_, 01-Feb-20 07:15 PM, #13
     Reply You have two problems here., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 01-Feb-20 08:53 PM #14
          Reply rank up n/t, robdarken_, 02-Feb-20 02:46 AM, #24
               Reply RE: rank up n/t, Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 02-Feb-20 11:40 AM, #34
                    Reply rank up, inspell n/t, robdarken_, 02-Feb-20 11:47 AM, #35
     Reply You're conflating two issues and proposing to solve one..., SPN, 01-Feb-20 10:43 PM, #16
     Reply RE: You're conflating two issues and proposing to solve..., Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 01-Feb-20 11:33 PM, #18
          Reply You still haven't explained how detect invis is going t..., incognito, 02-Feb-20 02:20 AM, #22
     Reply Rank past 25 and kill a mage, lasentia, 03-Feb-20 09:24 AM, #41
Reply lol, robdarken_, 31-Jan-20 08:45 PM, #3
Reply I'd argue Magi have the upper hand at low ranks, incognito, 01-Feb-20 11:42 AM, #5
     Reply The AC argument is false., SPN, 01-Feb-20 11:45 AM, #8
          Reply RE: The AC argument is false., incognito, 01-Feb-20 05:32 PM, #10
               Reply I've played enough mages to know to pack a hitroll set., SPN, 01-Feb-20 10:05 PM, #15
                    Reply I probably do more AC than you think, incognito, 02-Feb-20 04:41 AM, #27
Reply Seems silly. , Lhydia, 31-Jan-20 06:59 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Seems silly. , Battle Applicant (Anonymous), 31-Jan-20 07:02 PM, #2
          Reply The idea. n/t, Lhydia, 01-Feb-20 10:44 AM, #4
          Reply RE: Seems silly. , incognito, 02-Feb-20 02:40 PM, #37
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #73908 Previous topic | Next topic