You and Robdarken are not understanding. For you, having or not having second attack, third attack, enhanced damage, whatever, is irrelevant, because *you aren't getting the fight in the first place*. It's not about pk ability, it's about not having anyone to pk.

And for Rob, nothing about this change would change what you wrote or make a difference.

I think the thing you're both missing is that this change does one and only one single solitary thing: give village applicants truesight at level 25, without first having killed a mage. That's it.

All your points about warriors at lower levels remains the same, no change whatsoever. If a warrior wants to stick it out in the lower levels, and maybe go forever without seeing a mage and thus getting no kill, then too bad for him. And if a warrior wants to level up and let the mages come at him, as Robdarken wrote, he can do that, too. All that happens is once the warrior reaches 25, he gets detect invis. The higher level mage still has all the advantages as before, other than being unseen, because the applicant has no battle powers other than truesight.

There's no reason not to let battle applicants get truesight at 25, and every reason to do so.

It seems to me the only actual reason someone could be against this is if they just want to have the constant ability to avoid battle applicants, even after level 25. You want the free frags. That's not a valid reason.