I'd like to see it be frowned upon to give a taken item of power to Tremblefist.

The orc chief and the provost just should not be pals, and the tribunal should not be giving the fetish to the orcs. It just makes so sense to me.

Scarabs are the powerful, dangerous zealots who will accept subservient orcs, but I don't think a powerful zealot gives his enemies item of power to a subservient sycophant. It just makes no sense to me.

Empire, the great keeper's of Order and Civilization are actually breaking Imperial Law to give items to the uncivilized orcs. All items belong in the throne.

Entropy, they can do whatever they want. And I'm not too worried about Entropy/Orc team ups because those are two pretty small factions.

Battle, for some reason hates orcs and orcs hate Battle. There's actually no continuing basis for this, but it is what it is, but Battle should be too proud and too dependent on parity to every give an item to the orcs.

Fort/Outlander obviously wouldn't.

So yeah, if the one orc and the one entropist want to keep enemy items at GS, fine. Otherwise it seems out of role to me.

If people were keeping to their roles in this regard, I think it would indeed be quite balanced.