Murphy | Mon 16-Apr-18 02:34 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2010
1639 posts
| |
|
#70498, "This is the weirdest way to implement it, though."
|
There would at least be logic to neutrals not having protection at all, but randomness is just... meh.
|
|
|
Protection good/evil
[View all] , Murphy, Mon 16-Apr-18 01:05 AM
The main bonus of being neutral,
Kstatida,
16-Apr-18 03:07 AM, #5
Neutrals should lose protection good/evil entirely (nt),
Bemused,
16-Apr-18 01:19 AM, #1
Why?,
Murphy,
16-Apr-18 02:14 AM, #2
RE: Why?,
incognito,
16-Apr-18 02:23 AM, #3
This is the weirdest way to implement it, though.,
Murphy,
16-Apr-18 02:34 AM #4
This.,
Calion,
16-Apr-18 04:40 AM, #6
| |
|