Jormyr | Mon 17-Jul-17 10:44 AM |
Member since 31st Dec 2014
419 posts
| |
|
#68602, "RE: Savage rangers"
|
>An imm was wrong or deliberately deceptive. > >Savages have NO downside for ambush onslaught when using a >non-metal weapon - which is huge bonus compared to other >rangers. >Savage have standard downside for ambush onslaught when using >a metal weapon - which is definitely a downside.
Uh...I'm not sure if there's a communication issue or what.
Savage ranger w/ non-metal weapon = Uber ambush! Savage ranger w/ metal weapon = Normal Ambush Non-savage ranger w/ any weapon = Normal Ambush
What Destuvius and Daevryn are saying is there's no additional penalty to a savage ambushing w/ a metal weapon. They just don't receive the bonus they would from a non-metal weapon. So yes, a savage is *BETTER OFF* using a non-metal weapon, but they're at no penalty compared to a non-savage ranger when using a metal weapon. Similarly,
Ranger in wilderness = Awesome dodge! Ranger fighting shapeshifter = awesome dodge! Ranger fighting not shapeshifter in non-wilderness = normal dodge Thief fighting = normal dodge Orc fighting = normal dodge etc
Rangers don't take any *punishment* in dodging outside the wilderness, they're not just enjoying uber-dodge...which yeah, quickly reminds you how much that cloud giant dodge sucks.
|
|
|
Savage rangers
[View all] , Honestpaladin, Fri 14-Jul-17 08:17 PM
RE: Savage rangers,
Kstatida,
17-Jul-17 09:57 AM, #3
RE: Savage rangers,
Jormyr,
17-Jul-17 10:44 AM #4
I get your logic, but perceptionwise, it was deceptive,
Kstatida,
17-Jul-17 11:00 AM, #5
I am trying to remember back to a discussion I had with...,
Destuvius,
14-Jul-17 08:25 PM, #1
This is correct,
Onewingedangel,
15-Jul-17 03:33 AM, #2
| |
|