Subject: "RE: Not necessarily." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #63633
Show all folders

Wannabe (Anonymous)Sun 22-May-16 10:21 AM
Charter member
#63640, "RE: Not necessarily."


          

Killing a mage IS the start of the quest. Tahren ignores you until you do. Nor does killing a mage get you into the cabal.

The important point here is that regardless of how you view anything, everything either makes it more or less likely that a player will roll another character.

Thinking about the time it takes to find a mage online and in PK when I want to play a rager makes me want to do something else.

I have a char now who waited longer to see a mage online than you spent considering this suggestion. My time is worth something, too.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicRagers [View all] , Wannabe (Anonymous), Sat 21-May-16 02:57 PM
Reply Play an assassin or a svirfneblin until there is anothe..., Quixotic, 22-May-16 10:59 PM, #19
Reply Thickening a veil is hardly a rageful thing NT, Kstatida, 21-May-16 03:38 PM, #1
     Reply #### YOU WHITE ROOOOBES! BURN IN THE FORGES OF HELL! , Lhydia, 21-May-16 03:40 PM, #2
     Reply RE: Thickening a veil is hardly a rageful thing NT, bobbyp, 21-May-16 09:00 PM, #3
          Reply RE: Thickening a veil is hardly a rageful thing NT, Umiron, 21-May-16 09:29 PM, #4
               Reply Can't track those who give up. nt, Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 09:43 AM, #5
                    Reply Not necessarily., Umiron, 22-May-16 09:50 AM, #6
                         Reply RE: Not necessarily., Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 10:21 AM #7
                              Reply It's just a part of the rager process. , Lhydia, 22-May-16 10:51 AM, #8
                                   Reply RE: It's just a part of the rager process. , Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 11:25 AM, #9
                                        Reply To join Empire, all you have to do is donate gold...., Vonzamir, 22-May-16 11:48 AM, #10
                                             Reply BUT 5 HOURS GATHERING GOLD!?!? n/t, Lhydia, 22-May-16 11:57 AM, #11
                                                  Reply I don't understand this post., Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 12:15 PM, #12
                                                       Reply The last two were less than 5. , Lhydia, 22-May-16 12:28 PM, #13
                                                            Reply RE: The last two were less than 5. , Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 12:51 PM, #14
                                                                 Reply Its not a common sense alternative, Destuvius, 22-May-16 12:57 PM, #15
                                                                      Reply RE: Its not a common sense alternative, Wannabe (Anonymous), 22-May-16 01:24 PM, #16
                                                                      Reply eh, nope, Dallevian, 22-May-16 01:50 PM, #17
                                                                      Reply RE: Its not a common sense alternative, bobbyp, 22-May-16 04:17 PM, #18
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #63633 Previous topic | Next topic