|
#30673, "I respectfully disagree"
|
As daevryn has made clear the imms just don't actively enforcee fair play policies, even ones they have established to curb anti fair play behavior. Because the imms have given up this responsibility the only tool we as players have to try and achieve a level playing field is to apply e-social preassure to the parties to get them to change their behavior.
Do you think the change in behavior from full looting every kill to most people leaving most things most of the time happened because of imm involvement? Hell no it happened because as a social group we made it clear that was not kosher and people fell in line or risked being ostracized. Taking ic things to an ooc forum is a safety mechanism if you want to criticise it then you as administrators need to pick up the slack.
Personally I don't think the imms should be heavily and directly involved in this sort of policing all the time because frankly it will just wind up getting them flamed but as long as we have a secondary outlet for this kind of release we are ok.
|
|
|
RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.
[View all] , Jhyrbian, Fri 29-Jan-10 07:07 PM
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Malakhi,
06-Feb-10 01:17 AM, #85
Well written posts and...,
Arrna (Guest),
06-Feb-10 02:45 AM, #86
I respectfully disagree,
quas (Guest),
06-Feb-10 06:18 AM #87
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Isildur,
06-Feb-10 10:29 AM, #88
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Dervish2 (Guest),
06-Feb-10 11:16 AM, #89
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Isildur,
06-Feb-10 05:50 PM, #93
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Adarmar (Guest),
06-Feb-10 10:03 PM, #94
I agree and disagree.,
Pro (Guest),
06-Feb-10 04:15 PM, #92
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Malakhi,
06-Feb-10 11:42 AM, #90
Good post. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
06-Feb-10 03:01 PM, #91
RE: I respectfully disagree,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-10 11:22 PM, #95
But it does happen and it did happen a lot more in the ...,
Pro (Guest),
14-Feb-10 12:05 AM, #96
The Empire,
AlphaQ (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:10 PM, #68
RE: The Empire,
AlphaQ (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:12 PM, #69
I have no idea,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
31-Jan-10 02:19 PM, #70
Cosign (n/t),
Daevryn,
31-Jan-10 03:25 PM, #71
Double cosignation. n/t,
Graatch (Guest),
31-Jan-10 05:48 PM, #74
If you say so, but I don't know that this is practiced.,
Pro (Guest),
31-Jan-10 03:57 PM, #72
Posted on wrong thread. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
31-Jan-10 04:12 PM, #73
RE: I have no idea,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 02:12 AM, #75
But WHAT about empire is the problem? nt,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
01-Feb-10 03:48 AM, #76
RE: But WHAT about empire is the problem? nt,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 04:34 AM, #77
Also just the Empire in general, again I know its part ...,
AlphaQ (Guest),
01-Feb-10 04:40 AM, #78
Being realistic,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
01-Feb-10 02:15 PM, #79
RE: Being realistic,
Daevryn,
01-Feb-10 02:27 PM, #80
Was a certain box also nerfed?,
incognito,
03-Feb-10 05:11 PM, #84
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Amused (Guest),
29-Jan-10 02:50 PM, #63
misuse of the world 'grief'. nt,
marcus213 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 05:46 PM, #53
Seconded (n/t),
Daevryn,
28-Jan-10 06:49 PM, #54
Thirded n/t,
Klaak,
01-Feb-10 11:50 PM, #81
OOC Griefing in response to IC behavior,
Zen,
28-Jan-10 03:58 PM, #50
Yeah, that sucks,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:13 PM, #57
I'd severely or full loot you for such ####ty RPing. nt,
Dervish,
29-Jan-10 07:49 AM, #59
Pet Peeves 2010.,
SideStrider,
22-Jan-10 11:09 PM, #30
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 11:14 PM, #31
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Dweeble (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:36 PM, #40
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
23-Jan-10 09:23 PM, #43
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
SideStrider,
23-Jan-10 11:49 PM, #45
RE: Pet Peeves 2010.,
Daevryn,
24-Jan-10 12:01 AM, #46
Paladins that #### on the code,
NMTehW (Guest),
22-Jan-10 09:51 PM, #23
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 09:53 PM, #25
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Asyguest (Guest),
22-Jan-10 10:26 PM, #26
RE: Paladins that #### on the code,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 10:30 PM, #27
So get rid of the rule then...,
NMtehW (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:02 PM, #37
I agree. I think Paladins are held to to liberal a stan...,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:24 PM, #39
RE: So get rid of the rule then...,
Daevryn,
23-Jan-10 09:19 PM, #42
Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
NMTehW (Guest),
24-Jan-10 08:48 AM, #47
RE: Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
Tangni (Guest),
28-Jan-10 04:49 PM, #51
RE: Way to miss/deliberately ignore the main point:,
Tangni (Guest),
28-Jan-10 04:52 PM, #52
Notice how certain players,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:09 PM, #56
RE: Notice how certain players,
Tangi (Guest),
29-Jan-10 09:10 AM, #60
RE: Notice how certain players,
Tangni (Guest),
29-Jan-10 09:16 AM, #61
And both the imms and I,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
29-Jan-10 06:42 PM, #65
Yes, yes we got it. You was a greate roleplayer and bad...,
Alex (Guest),
29-Jan-10 06:50 PM, #66
Many paladins though,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:06 PM, #55
Bitch please,
NMTehW (Guest),
29-Jan-10 01:58 PM, #62
RE: Bitch please,
Daevryn,
29-Jan-10 03:02 PM, #64
RE: Bitch please,
Tangni (Guest),
29-Jan-10 02:48 PM, #67
RE: Bitch please,
Isildur,
14-Feb-10 11:15 AM, #97
There are quite a few variables.,
Lyristeon,
24-Jan-10 09:23 AM, #48
character pk builds that...,
Odrirg,
22-Jan-10 06:44 PM, #21
I like you man, but you gotta close the logic loop.,
Pro (Guest),
22-Jan-10 09:36 PM, #22
Except...,
Daevryn,
22-Jan-10 09:52 PM, #24
I was a machinegunner in the infantry.,
Pro (Guest),
22-Jan-10 10:32 PM, #28
good campfire talk /= good argument nt,
Splntrd,
22-Jan-10 10:33 PM, #29
wat,
blackbird,
23-Jan-10 02:16 AM, #32
RE: I was a machinegunner in the infantry.,
Amused (Guest),
23-Jan-10 03:45 AM, #33
I was refering to Daevryns comment.,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 11:24 AM, #34
RE: I was refering to Daevryns comment.,
Amused (Guest),
23-Jan-10 01:59 PM, #35
Went to.,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 03:17 PM, #36
Shut up America hater n/t,
NMTehW (Guest),
23-Jan-10 06:06 PM, #38
You missed my point.,
Odrirg,
23-Jan-10 06:47 PM, #41
Gotcha. That's lamer than lame. n/t,
Pro (Guest),
23-Jan-10 11:01 PM, #44
Just one thing...,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
20-Jan-10 09:52 AM, #6
RE: RP Pet-Peeves: All for a better 2010.,
Isildur,
20-Jan-10 09:39 AM, #5
You shouldn't. Next.,
jhyrb (Guest),
20-Jan-10 05:51 PM, #9
Semi-Agree,
Valkenar,
20-Jan-10 09:09 AM, #4
There is an intresting thing about this...,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 10:14 AM, #7
Man, I agree with so much,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 03:51 AM, #2
Worth adding,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 03:52 AM, #3
ESL murder Gnome Air/Off shifters.,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 12:59 AM, #1
It was YOU!!!,
Klaak,
20-Jan-10 05:52 PM, #8
So simply stop talking like a powergamer?,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:21 PM, #12
And to clarify...,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:24 PM, #13
I'm so glad I can pick you out so easily,
dwimmerling,
20-Jan-10 06:52 PM, #15
You seem to have missed the point...,
Klaak,
20-Jan-10 08:05 PM, #16
Dude, Pro is a black hole of attention, the ultimate tr...,
Lhydia,
20-Jan-10 09:15 PM, #18
It's infinitely better just to make him not want to pla...,
Scrimbul,
21-Jan-10 02:37 AM, #19
I honestly do not remember setting this forum avatar. n...,
Scrimbul,
21-Jan-10 02:40 AM, #20
Road,
House (Guest),
24-Jan-10 11:00 AM, #49
That was the best part of that episode. NT,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
28-Jan-10 07:30 PM, #58
RE: You seem to have missed the point...,
colospgsbryan2 (Guest),
03-Feb-10 02:45 AM, #82
ROFL. The gem rant slayed me.,
TMNS_lazy (Guest),
20-Jan-10 08:21 PM, #17
See that punctuation thing I don't get,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:16 PM, #10
the meaning isn't clear if you don't punctuate.,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:19 PM, #11
And thank you. :) n/t,
Pro (Guest),
20-Jan-10 06:31 PM, #14
RE: ESL murder Gnome Air/Off shifters.,
DurNominator,
03-Feb-10 10:46 AM, #83
| |
|