Subject: "RE: Your concern comes down to..." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2234
Show all folders

BolderethThu 18-Sep-03 03:49 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
197 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2309, "RE: Your concern comes down to..."


          

On the assumption that shamans haven't been overpowered for the last few years that they've been how they are, wouldn't being unable to stack damnation seem to be nerfing a skill that wasn't overpowered to begin with? It seemed to me that the whole basis for not being able to choose what stat got lowered was that you could cast it multiple times hoping for an affect.

Similiar to the Rhual/orc guard bug, it would seem to me that this is (albeit not as dramatic) akin to removing summon from necromancers rather than making the orcs unsummonable.

I suggest and hope that this occurs, that perhaps shamans could either choose which malediction they hit (even if on a basic level, such as physical (dex/str), mental (int, wis, svs), charisma (for charisma, since its really not something you'd pick overly often except against bards and maybe conjurers and types of warriors)...or they could still stack it with the caveat that it will not lower constitution. Frankly, other then rot, or landing plague/poison, I can't imagine many reasons why I'd rather reduce con over say svs & dex.

If such was implemented I would greatly appreciate it, despite not having any desire to play a shaman or having played a shaman for nearing 3 years now, simply because I wouldn't feel that the whole class was losing something based on one abused tactic. Please consider .

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicWaking when slept. [View all] , The Heretic, Sat 13-Sep-03 01:04 PM
Reply Your concern comes down to..., Zulghinlour, 14-Sep-03 02:20 PM, #10
Reply Cool., The Heretic, 14-Sep-03 03:08 PM, #11
Reply Throwing out the baby with the bathwater?, Brotmin, 15-Sep-03 04:10 PM, #12
Reply I agree very strongly on the 2+ class combo strength., Deavr, 15-Sep-03 07:02 PM, #13
     Reply mana is not really an issue, incognito, 15-Sep-03 09:01 PM, #14
     Reply Maybe I didn't say what I was getting at, very clearly., Brotmin, 15-Sep-03 09:41 PM, #15
          Reply I agree with you. And can hopefully test the change in ..., Deavr, 16-Sep-03 01:03 AM, #16
               Reply re the secret, incognito, 16-Sep-03 06:31 AM, #18
Reply Not cool., Deavr, 16-Sep-03 05:58 AM, #17
Reply RE: Your concern comes down to..., Boldereth, 18-Sep-03 03:49 AM #19
Reply Easy solution., Marcus_, 14-Sep-03 09:24 AM, #9
Reply RE: Waking when slept., Boldereth, 13-Sep-03 06:52 PM, #5
Reply yes and no, Quiditus, 13-Sep-03 01:55 PM, #4
Reply Might have a better solution here..., Urden, 13-Sep-03 01:30 PM, #3
Reply RE: Might have a better solution here..., Boldereth, 13-Sep-03 06:54 PM, #6
     Reply So now we know...so now we change them. nt, Urden, 13-Sep-03 07:13 PM, #7
Reply I think necro's have it bad enough as is. n/t, Krivohan, 13-Sep-03 01:09 PM, #1
     Reply Are you serious? n/t, The Heretic, 13-Sep-03 01:15 PM, #2
          Reply RE: Are you serious? n/t, thedrunkard, 13-Sep-03 09:30 PM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #2234 Previous topic | Next topic