Zulghinlour | Wed 16-Jan-08 09:09 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#20355, "RE: addendum. txt"
|
>1. Does a dagger spec wielding one dagger (primary wield) get >more concealed attacks than a dagger spec wielding two >daggers, all else being equal?
See: http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=3&topic_id=1276&mesg_id=1276&page=
>2. Do spec moves initiated from the off-hand via Balance of >the Sisters operate at a reduced rate of success, compared to >if the weapon was the primary wield?
I don't think so. The way I remember the code, is it just skips around the check that would say "You need to wield an axe in your mainhand to whirl." if you have balance, and the rest of the code executes normally. So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
three for one post!
[View all] , Isildur, Thu 24-Jan-08 11:26 PM
RE: three for one post!,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jan-08 09:06 PM, #6
RE: three for one post!,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-08 01:11 AM, #13
Sneaking failing for thieves and assassins.,
oero,
16-Jan-08 07:47 PM, #3
Please stop answering questions...,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jan-08 09:02 PM, #5
Captain Contrary strikes again. -nt-,
oero,
16-Jan-08 09:43 PM, #9
Or maybe zulgh and the entire community don't want newb...,
Scrimbul,
17-Jan-08 12:02 AM, #11
RE: Or maybe zulgh and the entire community don't want ...,
Isildur,
17-Jan-08 12:10 AM, #12
Yes, but even you know this isn't some macro level 'if ...,
Scrimbul,
17-Jan-08 02:21 AM, #14
RE: Yes, but even you know this isn't some macro level ...,
oero,
17-Jan-08 06:20 AM, #16
RE: Why you're going away.,
Valguarnera,
17-Jan-08 07:24 AM, #17
RE: Why you're going away.,
Eskelian,
17-Jan-08 03:13 PM, #19
No, YOUR overpowered.,
GinGa,
17-Jan-08 08:18 PM, #22
Hey Valg. txt,
Gabe,
17-Jan-08 03:16 PM, #20
Hahhah. I've restrained doing that twice already.,
DurNominator,
17-Jan-08 03:25 PM, #21
RE: Yes, but even you know this isn't some macro level ...,
Daevryn,
17-Jan-08 10:05 AM, #18
Thanks for proving I did the right thing (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
20-Jan-08 01:14 PM, #24
Okay - Gotta jump in here...,
Zargu,
23-Jan-08 04:35 AM, #25
Re: Pictures of Zulg...,
Zulghinlour,
23-Jan-08 11:41 AM, #26
No. Not THAT one. The OTHER one. nt,
Nivek1,
23-Jan-08 04:27 PM, #27
I call it "Tree Pixie" nt,
Isildur,
23-Jan-08 09:13 PM, #28
This is Zulghinlour you're talking about,
oero,
17-Jan-08 06:21 AM, #15
You've got to be f*cking kidding me...,
Twist,
17-Jan-08 01:13 PM, #30
Actually you don't because we banned you. Again,
incognito,
20-Jan-08 11:33 AM, #23
You don't follow QHCF....txt,
Gabe,
17-Jan-08 03:17 PM, #29
Gotta agree with the others here...,
colospgsbryan,
25-Jan-08 07:39 PM, #31
addendum. txt,
Isildur,
16-Jan-08 05:39 PM, #1
RE: addendum. txt,
_Magus_,
16-Jan-08 07:25 PM, #2
RE: addendum. txt,
Isildur,
16-Jan-08 08:22 PM, #4
RE: addendum. txt,
Zulghinlour,
16-Jan-08 09:09 PM #7
RE: addendum. txt,
Isildur,
16-Jan-08 09:30 PM, #8
Next time, just listen to me. nt,
Dallevian,
16-Jan-08 10:23 PM, #10
| |
|