Subject: "On the contrary" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #50440
Show all folders

ValkenarWed 17-Jul-13 01:31 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1203 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#50463, "On the contrary"


          

>These badass vs group fights are awesome, when they happen,
>and they would disappear if your idea got implemented because
>no
>powerful char would choose to get ganked.

Right now you have situations where people go through all sorts of machinations to stay out of battles, because it's worse to have more people fighting. I find this ridiculous.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicAnti-gang code vs uberness [View all] , Valkenar, Mon 15-Jul-13 11:22 AM
Reply Bad idea, -flso, 16-Jul-13 04:06 PM, #11
Reply On the contrary, Valkenar, 17-Jul-13 01:31 PM #12
Reply Isn't this the point of anti-gang code?, highbutterfly, 15-Jul-13 10:40 PM, #7
Reply RE: Anti-gang code vs uberness, Eskelian, 15-Jul-13 03:32 PM, #4
Reply We all play by the same set of rules, TJHuron, 15-Jul-13 02:59 PM, #3
Reply Basic agreement, Valkenar, 15-Jul-13 08:04 PM, #5
     Reply Yeah, I missed the part about it resetting on death., TJHuron, 15-Jul-13 10:02 PM, #6
          Reply So... If you're an AP and manage to get a 75 charge wea..., Amberion, 16-Jul-13 01:43 AM, #8
               Reply Hold up here, TJHuron, 16-Jul-13 08:25 AM, #9
Reply I think this is an interesting idea., Zephon, 15-Jul-13 01:05 PM, #1
     Reply the last thing exists, laxman, 15-Jul-13 01:23 PM, #2
          Reply Woot! As it should be., Zephon, 16-Jul-13 09:40 AM, #10
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #50440 Previous topic | Next topic