Subject: "RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546
Show all folders

EskelianFri 13-Aug-10 11:55 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34568, "RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:"


          

Well, I get what you're saying and I agree that, if it was me and not Torak, I wouldn't have gotten denied. I still avoid things because I'm afraid they might be against the rules.

Recent example is traps and trapper skills. I have no way to really test these things out easily on myself and I need to test them in game. But any attempt to test them in game, without going OOC, is difficult at best. Char tells you, "Looks like this trap breaks my strength by 8 stones for 5 hours." But I'm hindered because, let's face it, coordinating testing of traps over AIM would be considered shady depending on who you talk to. But I'm sorta screwed because how would I achieve that without it? And its not unreasonable to know what the effects of the skills are.

Like look at the example with blister agent. How would you possibly know it stopped spellcasting? Now I want to know if its frequent, semi-frequent, or sorta rare. But how do I test that in game without blatently breaking role?

That's why the vagueness annoys me, I feel like I need to be ultra-conservative at the detriment to my enjoyment of the game because certain anti-social elements of the playerbase don't want anyone talking to each other OOC.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicSo it's been a week.... [View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Reply Well, Valkenar, 13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Reply Non sequitur, The Heretic, 13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
Reply not everyone thinks a change would be good., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Reply Seconded... (n/t), yr_blues, 13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
Reply There's a few problems with your argument, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
     Reply the problem is.., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
          Reply But see, I don't have to guess., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
               Reply i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
                         Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
                              Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
                    Reply Your deflection fails., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
                         Reply Did you say something new?, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
                              Reply FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
     Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
          Reply i can agree here, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
Reply So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #8
     Reply The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
          Reply Give me examples, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
          Reply welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
          Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
               Reply Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Twist, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:55 AM #20
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
                         Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
                    Reply I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
                         Reply RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
                              Reply I say personally, I'm an IMP..., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
                    Reply I can vouch for this., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
                         Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
                              Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
                              Reply Oh, I know., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
               Reply So...., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
               Reply This pretty much sums it up for me, Zulghinlour, 13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
               Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
                    Reply Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
                              Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
                                   Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
                                        Reply Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
                                             Reply RE: Ugh, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
                                                  Reply RE: Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Reply Why respond?, Asthiss, 13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
Reply I aggree....small text, Behnistek, 13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
     Reply you are beating a dead horse, laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546 Previous topic | Next topic