Torak | Fri 13-Aug-10 11:24 AM |
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1216 posts
| |
|
#34561, "Give me examples"
Edited on Fri 13-Aug-10 11:27 AM
|
I love how people keep saying this same response - "a long well documented history of trying to break the spirit of the rules without breaking the letter".
Let's get a few things clear. My "history" involves some ####ed up events but 90% of those were an enraged teenager almost ten years ago breaking the rules to get back at "the man". I'm not rehashing this but if you were even present for these events, it had nothing to do with OOC. Posting wand lists and such isn't trying to "stay in the letter of the law". They moved on, I moved on, get over it.
Rawvos was one of the first characters in a very very long time where I hung out pretty often with a friend in-game for pvp (not exclusively if ya check his pk stats). I was called out on it but never had anything enforced on him (nor has any of the other Imperials who are basically pulling the same thing right now). So my next character I made specifically to avoid the people I know unless it was to explore (an Ehren Scarab) since I didn't want a repeat. And I get denied after one successful Hell trip without even a warning/discussion. Loshnak is the first guy to have in the Realm of the Dead for at least 5 years if not longer.
So yeah, this history of bending the rules...I'd love to hear it - give me an example of a single character in the last few years who broke these OOC rules like I did with Rawvos and "steam rolled PVP" as people like to state considering his mediocre stats at best.
And I'm not even *pointing* to my post, I'm pointing to Eskelian's which has nothing to do with mine. Hell I don't even know the guy and he gets a hugely welcome response and no Immortal one. Stop going back to the response "Cheater McCheater, I'm not answering you!" and man up and answer this guy's post.
|
|
|
So it's been a week....
[View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Well,
Valkenar,
13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Non sequitur,
The Heretic,
13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
not everyone thinks a change would be good.,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Seconded... (n/t),
yr_blues,
13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
There's a few problems with your argument,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
the problem is..,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
But see, I don't have to guess.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
Your deflection fails.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
Did you say something new?,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
i can agree here,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #8
The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
Give me examples,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:27 AM #13
welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering.,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
I say personally, I'm an IMP...,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
I can vouch for this.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
Oh, I know.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
So....,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
This pretty much sums it up for me,
Zulghinlour,
13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
RE: Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
RE: Ugh,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
RE: Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Why respond?,
Asthiss,
13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
I aggree....small text,
Behnistek,
13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
you are beating a dead horse,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
| |
|