Subject: "So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546
Show all folders

TorakFri 13-Aug-10 11:01 AM
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1216 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34556, "So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim"
Edited on Fri 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM

          

Clearly defined rules means you that you wouldn't get situations like the one that just happened....but you're basically saying "you'll get denied if we feel like it" since sometimes it's fine and sometimes it's not.

1) We had chars that knew each other in-game that pvped together, which was a no-no. They're gone, moving on...
2) It was stated by Nep that as long as you don't pvp together and didn't "abuse" it, it was fine considering he grouped with his wife a lot and they have had characters at the same time several times.
3) So we made chars that never pvped together, didn't even rank together really, and purely hung out to enjoy Hell together.
4) With no warning we were denied on solid characters purely for the Hell trip when we did exactly was stated by Nep as "fine" by the rules around no-pvp together.
5) I've never seen anyone denied for OOC hell groups which have existed from the beginning of CF.

So yeah, I think the rules should be clearly defined. Maybe if it was clear about what your problem is with OOC knowledge of others I wouldn't lose 300 hours on a Scarab character because of it.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicSo it's been a week.... [View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Reply Well, Valkenar, 13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Reply Non sequitur, The Heretic, 13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
Reply not everyone thinks a change would be good., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Reply Seconded... (n/t), yr_blues, 13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
Reply There's a few problems with your argument, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
     Reply the problem is.., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
          Reply But see, I don't have to guess., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
               Reply i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
                         Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
                              Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
                    Reply Your deflection fails., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
                         Reply Did you say something new?, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
                              Reply FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
     Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
          Reply i can agree here, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
Reply So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM #8
     Reply The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
          Reply Give me examples, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
          Reply welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
          Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
               Reply Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Twist, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
                         Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
                    Reply I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
                         Reply RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
                              Reply I say personally, I'm an IMP..., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
                    Reply I can vouch for this., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
                         Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
                              Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
                              Reply Oh, I know., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
               Reply So...., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
               Reply This pretty much sums it up for me, Zulghinlour, 13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
               Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
                    Reply Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
                              Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
                                   Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
                                        Reply Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
                                             Reply RE: Ugh, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
                                                  Reply RE: Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Reply Why respond?, Asthiss, 13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
Reply I aggree....small text, Behnistek, 13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
     Reply you are beating a dead horse, laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546 Previous topic | Next topic