Torak | Fri 13-Aug-10 11:01 AM |
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1216 posts
| |
|
#34556, "So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim"
Edited on Fri 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM
|
Clearly defined rules means you that you wouldn't get situations like the one that just happened....but you're basically saying "you'll get denied if we feel like it" since sometimes it's fine and sometimes it's not.
1) We had chars that knew each other in-game that pvped together, which was a no-no. They're gone, moving on... 2) It was stated by Nep that as long as you don't pvp together and didn't "abuse" it, it was fine considering he grouped with his wife a lot and they have had characters at the same time several times. 3) So we made chars that never pvped together, didn't even rank together really, and purely hung out to enjoy Hell together. 4) With no warning we were denied on solid characters purely for the Hell trip when we did exactly was stated by Nep as "fine" by the rules around no-pvp together. 5) I've never seen anyone denied for OOC hell groups which have existed from the beginning of CF.
So yeah, I think the rules should be clearly defined. Maybe if it was clear about what your problem is with OOC knowledge of others I wouldn't lose 300 hours on a Scarab character because of it.
|
|
|
So it's been a week....
[View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Well,
Valkenar,
13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Non sequitur,
The Heretic,
13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
not everyone thinks a change would be good.,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Seconded... (n/t),
yr_blues,
13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
There's a few problems with your argument,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
the problem is..,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
But see, I don't have to guess.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
Your deflection fails.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
Did you say something new?,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
i can agree here,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:05 AM #8
The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
Give me examples,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering.,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
I say personally, I'm an IMP...,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
I can vouch for this.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
Oh, I know.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
So....,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
This pretty much sums it up for me,
Zulghinlour,
13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
RE: Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
RE: Ugh,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
RE: Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Why respond?,
Asthiss,
13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
I aggree....small text,
Behnistek,
13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
you are beating a dead horse,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
| |
|