thendrell | Fri 07-May-10 07:55 PM |
Member since 08th May 2009
134 posts
| |
|
#32524, "Conceited much?"
|
This whole post I found to be nothing more than conceit. I have not read another post yet, let me be up front about that, so excuse me if this echoes other thoughts, but the idea that you want an Imm who already took the time to read your role to say no, someone else read it because I didn't drop 1500 on him? You want every Imm to read it, and the one who rates it highest to give you XP? Really? Come on, that's about the biggest load of bs I've ever heard.
I don't know if you think you write such great **** in your roles that an Imm who does not give you the 1500 should just do nothing so that someone else might than have the glorious privilege of reading it and dropping the XP you so richly deserve. I doubt it, you seem respectful, but at the same time insulting to the Imms.
Were I an Imm I would essentially be lobbying for removal of role exp all together because of posts like this. You say you write roles for you? Good. Keep doing it. That's what it is for.
You know what IMM xp is? A chance bonus. A chance that you get an Imm to read it. A chance that the Imm who reads it likes it. A chance that the Imm than gives you xp. It's not a job, and it sure as hell is a jackass move to say leave it for someone else to read because you know what they will enjoy. Imms who watch your char and find it interesting will take a look at your role. Give them a reason to with your regular RP. If Imms want to read fun entertaining stories, they probably buy a book by a favorite author. They look at roles to learn about your char. If they are entertained more the the better for them, but that's not why they are doing it as far as I can tell.
Plus, an Imm in a role contest reads the whole role, so there you go, enter every month and soon all the Imms will see it. The day to day stuff you seem to want is excessive and cumbersome on an already taxed Imm staff, and that's a shame, cause knowing characters you;ve played and seeing their roles you do write good roles and play good memorable chars, but this post is nothing more than a pat on your own back for that.
And yeah, a few drinks when I wrote this, but this post really annoyed me. Sorry.
|
|
|
Role exp
[View all] , Valkenar, Fri 07-May-10 10:46 AM
I would like to add,
Beroxxus,
08-May-10 12:25 AM, #31
Conceited much?,
thendrell,
07-May-10 07:55 PM #21
Last post for me in this thread,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 10:55 PM, #29
Valkenar just made me sad.,
Pendragon_Surtr,
07-May-10 07:19 PM, #18
:) (n/t),
Daevryn,
07-May-10 07:29 PM, #20
500 doesn't mean crappy,
Zulghinlour,
07-May-10 08:17 PM, #23
Not necessarily :),
TheLastMohican,
07-May-10 08:59 PM, #27
As a complete aside:,
Daevryn,
07-May-10 03:32 PM, #12
I'd hope Thrak's role came out in my play.,
TheLastMohican,
07-May-10 08:21 PM, #24
Let me just say...,
Twist,
07-May-10 01:06 PM, #9
Big co-sign nt,
Rayihn,
07-May-10 02:21 PM, #10
Couldn't have said it better (n/t),
Nnaeshuk,
07-May-10 03:21 PM, #11
RE: Couldn't have said it better (n/t),
Isildur,
07-May-10 04:22 PM, #14
Not yet, though,
Rayihn,
07-May-10 06:18 PM, #17
That's fair...,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 04:16 PM, #13
Disagree,
Knac,
07-May-10 08:43 PM, #26
RE: Role exp,
Daevryn,
07-May-10 11:25 AM, #4
My case,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 11:37 AM, #6
RE: Role exp,
Isildur,
07-May-10 11:02 AM, #1
Is that a problem?,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 11:12 AM, #2
RE: Is that a problem?,
Isildur,
07-May-10 11:12 AM, #3
Bounds?,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 11:26 AM, #5
RE: Bounds?,
Isildur,
07-May-10 11:40 AM, #7
RE: Bounds?,
Zulghinlour,
07-May-10 01:00 PM, #8
I'm cool with that!,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 04:23 PM, #15
RE: I'm cool with that!,
Daevryn,
07-May-10 04:26 PM, #16
Exactly!,
Valkenar,
07-May-10 07:27 PM, #19
Slight comment...,
TheLastMohican,
07-May-10 08:12 PM, #22
Cosign. Except one thing...,
Dervish,
07-May-10 08:26 PM, #25
Yeah I hear you on that...,
TheLastMohican,
07-May-10 09:05 PM, #28
Tangent,
Daevryn,
08-May-10 12:14 AM, #30
| |
|