Subject: "A few suggestions for this type of world" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #28013
Show all folders

Kamuela_Thu 04-May-06 09:32 PM
Member since 18th Sep 2004
60 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#28016, "A few suggestions for this type of world"


          

If we were to cut down the number of factions, that would drastically increase the amount of players per faction, which would most likely allow us to get more of the epic battles that have been missing of late. In a scenario like this suggests, leadership roles would entail more.

Say when a leader dies, it hurts the cabal's morale by a lot (Say something really noticeable, like 30 or 40, instead of the current minor morale bonus/deficits for raiding). Also, make it beneficial for the cabal to have their leaders about, to counteract the effects of a leader death. Leaders could have powers that are aimed more towards increasing the effectiveness of their citizens (good), or aimed at sucking the power of their subordinates for themselves (evil)

This would be simplifying the game down to a significant degree, but I don't know if it makes sense to keep on doing business as usual while our numbers are beginning to decline towards the point of no return. I generally see 8-12 people on my pk at hero, and with 7 cabals(?) and plenty of options that don't involve cabals, the wars really don't feel like wars. With 10 people on pk, and 250 areas, the only way to reliably seek out combat is to have a class with far reaching senses/attacks, or raiding cabals back and forth. We need a driving force to bring people together again, like they once were.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT Topicmage cabal revisited, question? [View all] , Zandorix (inactive user), Thu 04-May-06 04:21 PM
Reply Warlocks Revisited- Mage Cabal Candidate?, bugboy, 28-Aug-09 05:28 AM, #45
Reply I don't think a goodie mage cabal is the answer., _Magus_, 28-Aug-09 09:17 AM, #46
Reply RE: I don't think a goodie mage cabal is the answer., bugboy, 28-Aug-09 01:13 PM, #47
Reply Some questions, DurNominator, 29-Aug-09 01:23 AM, #48
Reply My god, lock this thread for obvious reasons nt, Scrimbul, 29-Aug-09 02:11 AM, #49
Reply Neo-Mage, Kastellyn, 08-May-06 12:40 AM, #36
Reply I completely understand, Xaannix, 08-May-06 03:05 AM, #37
Reply Just had an awesome idea..., GinGa, 08-May-06 06:13 AM, #38
Reply Defining the 'insert name here' cabal, Quixotic, 08-May-06 11:28 AM, #39
Reply Neo-Mage: concept, Caleban, 08-May-06 02:48 PM, #41
Reply Here is another suggestion., Xaannix, 05-May-06 06:42 PM, #30
Reply Another problem related to stagnation, Xaannix, 05-May-06 06:59 PM, #31
     Reply I imagine it is tough for an IMM staff that is made up ..., wretchedmongrel, 05-May-06 07:00 PM, #32
Reply RE: mage cabal revisited, question?, Grurk Muouk, 05-May-06 09:44 AM, #13
Reply I'm so irritated., Dallevian, 05-May-06 12:42 PM, #17
Reply Ok, I'm back and here's my cabal idea., Dallevian, 05-May-06 02:43 PM, #21
     Reply I LOVE the idea., Beer, 05-May-06 03:40 PM, #22
     Reply Sounds like masters with different powers, Theerkla, 05-May-06 04:04 PM, #23
     Reply RE: Ok, I'm back and here's my cabal idea., nepenthe, 05-May-06 04:37 PM, #24
     Reply Screw all of that and just give them evoke., Aiekooso, 05-May-06 04:50 PM, #25
     Reply Isn't that, Dallevian, 05-May-06 05:26 PM, #27
     Reply Its the same thing, Xaannix, 05-May-06 05:18 PM, #26
          Reply Why hate on Masters?, Dallevian, 05-May-06 05:31 PM, #28
               Reply Masters isnt the point, Xaannix, 05-May-06 05:49 PM, #29
Reply RE: mage cabal revisited, question?, Isengrim, 07-May-06 08:40 PM, #34
     Reply RE: mage cabal revisited, question?, Grurk Muouk, 07-May-06 11:24 PM, #35
Reply RE: mage cabal revisited, question?, nepenthe, 04-May-06 08:56 PM, #3
Reply It would be the same, Xaannix, 04-May-06 09:04 PM, #4
Reply Empire if anything is a good reason to not have a mage ..., Theerkla, 05-May-06 01:08 AM, #8
Reply It will, Xaannix, 05-May-06 02:07 AM, #9
     Reply RE: It will, nepenthe, 05-May-06 07:19 AM, #11
          Reply RE: It will, Xaannix, 05-May-06 12:24 PM, #15
Reply RE: It would be the same, nepenthe, 05-May-06 01:21 PM, #18
     Reply What makes you think, Xaannix, 08-May-06 12:51 PM, #40
          Reply RE: What makes you think, Valguarnera, 08-May-06 03:01 PM, #42
          Reply RE: What makes you think, Xaannix, 08-May-06 06:33 PM, #44
          Reply RE: What makes you think, nepenthe, 08-May-06 06:02 PM, #43
Reply Contest of the month!, jasmin, 04-May-06 10:20 PM, #6
     Reply I dig this idea, Drag0nSt0rm, 04-May-06 10:38 PM, #7
Reply Would probably have to nerf..., Lightmage, 04-May-06 06:07 PM, #1
     Reply I dont think another cabal will be a good idea, Xaannix, 04-May-06 09:08 PM, #2
          Reply A few suggestions for this type of world, Kamuela_, 04-May-06 09:32 PM #5
          Reply I agree wholeheartedly.., shamanman, 05-May-06 05:36 AM, #10
               Reply Therein is the issue, Theerkla, 05-May-06 08:57 AM, #12
                    Reply Cabal player cap. nt, Xaannix, 05-May-06 12:27 PM, #16
                         Reply Multi-charring means the cap would need to be fairly dy..., Theerkla, 05-May-06 02:25 PM, #19
                              Reply im not very technically, Xaannix, 05-May-06 02:40 PM, #20
          Reply One massive War would be awesome.., Lightmage, 05-May-06 10:21 AM, #14
               Reply I LOVE this idea, seriously, This is genius lightmage. ..., shamanman, 07-May-06 07:16 PM, #33
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #28013 Previous topic | Next topic