Zulghinlour | Thu 23-Oct-03 01:33 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#2711, "RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a"
|
>Hm, not sure about grudge, but perhaps >it must be the rule to have a reason for PK? >The reason can be any, but IMMs must watch for it >just ask some PKillers for what reasons do they >have to kill that man(If IMMS dont see them upon first look).
I honestly have far better things to do than to check the reason player A attacked player B.
>And probably its a good idea ( i read about it in this forum) to >hide classes (as titles) from WHO list
I think it's a horrible idea, and totally changes the way the game is balanced.
>so paladins and other goodies will not slay evil ones just for >they >are evil ones. They must have some more proofs than simply >"you are anti-paladin" so you must be killed.
Because detect evil won't tell them they are evil? Just changes from "You are an anti-paladin" to "You are evil". So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
The RP in PK. The idea of a "grudge" command
[View all] , hidetora, Wed 22-Oct-03 01:17 PM
RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a,
Dervish,
23-Oct-03 01:28 PM, #7
RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a,
Zulghinlour,
23-Oct-03 01:33 PM #8
RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a,
Dervish,
23-Oct-03 06:28 PM, #9
RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a,
nepenthe,
24-Oct-03 06:20 AM, #11
RE: The RP in PK. The idea of a,
Boldereth,
23-Oct-03 06:46 PM, #10
decent idea. not sure it is practical though,
incognito,
22-Oct-03 05:27 PM, #3
RE: decent idea. not sure it is practical though,
hidetora,
22-Oct-03 05:53 PM, #4
how about grudging -after- the fact?,
Evil Genius (Anonymous),
22-Oct-03 07:40 PM, #6
RE: Grudge,
Valguarnera,
22-Oct-03 04:58 PM, #2
RE: Grudge WITHDRAWN,
hidetora,
22-Oct-03 06:14 PM, #5
ugh,
permanewbie,
22-Oct-03 03:59 PM, #1
| |
|