Subject: "RE: Yeah" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #25077
Show all folders

TacWed 10-Jun-09 03:13 PM
Member since 15th Nov 2005
2050 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#25126, "RE: Yeah"


          

>Most of the time when I read your posts I think "Wow, this
>guy's a ####." You probably (hopefully) don't mean to come
>off that way but you do anyways.

Yea I get that, as in understand intellectually, but when I read them back in my head they don't sound that way, so I'm not sure how to overcome it without having someone proof read for me.


>And I think you sort missed my question. What happened during
>that time before people knew the sets, knew the 20 locations
>to look, etc? Was the game broken then for mages?

I'm not infinitely familiar with how mages shook out when they first came in, but, what I do know is that there is a big big difference between 20 interlinked spots which a single person could feasibly explore, barter, randomly stumble upon, and duo stalk for, and 100+ totally random spots.

It's sort of like perfecting every skill with and elf warrior, versus doing it as an orc berserker. Yes both are possible, no neither class is broken, but one is hard but bearable, and the other is stupidly difficult and mostly a complete waste of time and effort that only a masochist would attempt. If you are a type of player who feels it necessary to perfect every skill, then you are probably not going to play an orc berserker. Similarly, if you are the type of player who feels it necessary to find/use/always have ABS with your mages, you've just been demoted to orc status, and you will probably find something better to do with your time.

Tac

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicThe New Wand Locations [View all] , Guilo, Tue 09-Jun-09 09:29 AM
Reply Hold up....a sleek black rod in an area explore area?, Habbs, 09-Jun-09 01:57 PM, #12
Reply Mages aren't for you, Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 04:36 PM, #15
Reply Two of mine were in area explore actually., Guilo, 10-Jun-09 09:43 AM, #34
     Reply RE: Two of mine were in area explore actually., Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 10:33 AM, #37
          Reply I think he is probably just being honest, and pragmatic..., Larcat, 10-Jun-09 11:00 AM, #38
          Reply Well, you have made getting sleek wands exponentially h..., TMNS, 10-Jun-09 11:03 AM, #39
               Reply A question then, Rayihn, 10-Jun-09 12:55 PM, #41
                    Reply Less spots to check., Tac, 10-Jun-09 01:16 PM, #42
                    Reply Yeah, Rayihn, 10-Jun-09 02:08 PM, #44
                         Reply RE: Yeah, Tac, 10-Jun-09 03:13 PM #48
                         Reply Answer, Abernyte, 11-Jun-09 04:31 AM, #68
                    Reply Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed the dy..., TMNS, 10-Jun-09 02:05 PM, #43
                    Reply RE: Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed th..., Rayihn, 10-Jun-09 02:12 PM, #45
                         Reply Adding to a players daily tedium txt, Larcat, 10-Jun-09 02:30 PM, #46
                         Reply Cosign. Its just tedious and boring now., Dervish, 10-Jun-09 03:29 PM, #49
                         Reply RE: Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed th..., Not An Imm, 10-Jun-09 05:04 PM, #50
                         Reply Kids hunt for easter eggs, Mekantos, 10-Jun-09 05:19 PM, #51
                         Reply DRRRRRRRRRRAMA. (n/t), Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 05:30 PM, #52
                         Reply Ah, screw it., Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 05:34 PM, #53
                         Reply It's not so bad, Valkenar, 10-Jun-09 05:56 PM, #54
                         Reply DRRRRRRRRRRAMA., Dallevian, 10-Jun-09 06:00 PM, #55
                         Reply I don't see how I'm in category #3?, TMNS, 10-Jun-09 08:13 PM, #58
                         Reply It's just a muddle., Adhelard, 10-Jun-09 08:38 PM, #61
                         Reply Short response:, Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 09:31 PM, #65
                              Reply Ah gotcha. I fall into the same 'trap' from time to ti..., TMNS, 10-Jun-09 09:39 PM, #66
                         Reply RE: Ah, screw it., Eskelian, 10-Jun-09 08:34 PM, #60
                              Reply The contest is there for a reason, Zulghinlour, 10-Jun-09 08:53 PM, #62
                                   Reply RE: The contest is there for a reason, Turing, 10-Jun-09 09:01 PM, #63
                                   Reply Big Ups to Zulgh here txt, Larcat, 10-Jun-09 09:26 PM, #64
                                   Reply RE: The contest is there for a reason, Zulghinlour, 10-Jun-09 09:45 PM, #67
                                   Reply RE: The contest is there for a reason, Jhishesh, 13-Jun-09 02:26 PM, #70
                                   Reply RE: The contest is there for a reason, Eskelian, 13-Jun-09 10:34 AM, #69
                         Reply When you piss people off enough, Mekantos, 10-Jun-09 07:17 PM, #56
                         Reply One thing, there is hardly any warriors in the Fort., TMNS, 10-Jun-09 08:07 PM, #57
                         Reply I kinda get the gist of what you are saying here..., TMNS, 10-Jun-09 08:16 PM, #59
                    Reply The old spots were also plausible.. read please., Guilo, 10-Jun-09 02:38 PM, #47
Reply Mages aren't supposed to be like melee, Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 12:34 PM, #9
Reply Ok, but., Dallevian, 09-Jun-09 12:37 PM, #11
Reply That's just how it is., Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 04:32 PM, #14
     Reply Tell me., Dallevian, 09-Jun-09 04:59 PM, #16
          Reply RE: Tell me., Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 05:17 PM, #17
          Reply Probably, Dwoggurd, 09-Jun-09 05:35 PM, #18
          Reply RE: Probably, Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 06:15 PM, #21
          Reply Well, Dwoggurd, 09-Jun-09 06:29 PM, #22
          Reply RE: Probably, Isildur, 09-Jun-09 11:52 PM, #27
               Reply RE: Probably, Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 12:38 AM, #29
               Reply But, Dwoggurd, 10-Jun-09 07:35 AM, #31
                    Reply RE: But, Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 11:10 AM, #40
               Reply And?, Dwoggurd, 10-Jun-09 07:27 AM, #30
                    Reply RE: And?, Isildur, 10-Jun-09 09:09 AM, #32
          Reply That's because., Dallevian, 10-Jun-09 10:27 AM, #35
               Reply RE: That's because., Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 10:33 AM, #36
          Reply RE: Tell me., Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 05:40 PM, #19
               Reply RE: Tell me., Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 06:10 PM, #20
                    Reply Re, Dwoggurd, 09-Jun-09 06:33 PM, #23
                    Reply RE: Tell me., Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 06:57 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Tell me., Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 09:43 PM, #25
                              Reply RE: Tell me., Valkenar, 09-Jun-09 11:51 PM, #26
                                   Reply RE: Tell me., Daevryn, 10-Jun-09 12:34 AM, #28
                                        Reply RE: Tell me., Valkenar, 10-Jun-09 09:32 AM, #33
Reply Yeah cause a svirf warrior can't do that, Guilo, 09-Jun-09 03:45 PM, #13
Reply RE: The New Wand Locations, Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 09:34 AM, #1
     Reply This, to me at least, begs the question...., Tac, 09-Jun-09 09:58 AM, #2
     Reply So why not make it a bit easier?, Guilo, 09-Jun-09 10:04 AM, #3
     Reply But that blows., Dallevian, 09-Jun-09 10:21 AM, #4
     Reply I really think some overhaul change is needed., Guilo, 09-Jun-09 10:49 AM, #5
          Reply There was just a giant discussion about this, Daevryn, 09-Jun-09 10:57 AM, #6
               Reply You beat me to that..., Dragomir, 09-Jun-09 11:00 AM, #7
               Reply Yeah but there was no solution, Guilo, 09-Jun-09 12:13 PM, #8
                    Reply Like I just posted above, I agree, Dallevian, 09-Jun-09 12:34 PM, #10
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #25077 Previous topic | Next topic