|
Dwoggurd | Tue 09-Jun-09 06:29 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2004
668 posts
|    |
|
#25099, "Well"
|
>The problem is that you're arguing something different than
>the issue at hand.
>
>Your claim: hero mage > 30s mage.
>
>Post I was responding to: 30s mage < every other level range
>of mage.
Well, 30s mage < 40s < 51s mages  (in most cases).
Still, I've read the abs thread on the contest forum, but I couldn't fetch the reason of moving wands and posibility to explore for them towards hero range other than "we think it should be moved there".
Just a few points:
- if you want exploration aspect in getting wands I can understand it. But why don't let level 30 mage explore for it and make detect artifact available. For a middle level mages exploration is hardly an easy walk even with this spell.
- why move the barrier edge and most of barrier sources to near hero? If you make barriers available for 30s mages, it will not make it worse for other classes than hero mages vs. other classes.
The only problem I see with that: affordable wand sources at 30 will be easy for heroes, but I think it can be solved with level limits on wands like this wand works for 30-35, etc. Hell, you can even come with separate sets of sleeks for 30-40 and 40-51.
|
|
|
 The New Wand Locations
[View all] , Guilo, Tue 09-Jun-09 09:29 AM
  Hold up....a sleek black rod in an area explore area?,
Habbs,
09-Jun-09 01:57 PM, #12
 Mages aren't for you,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 04:36 PM, #15
 Two of mine were in area explore actually.,
Guilo,
10-Jun-09 09:43 AM, #34
RE: Two of mine were in area explore actually.,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 10:33 AM, #37
I think he is probably just being honest, and pragmatic...,
Larcat,
10-Jun-09 11:00 AM, #38
Well, you have made getting sleek wands exponentially h...,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 11:03 AM, #39
A question then,
Rayihn,
10-Jun-09 12:55 PM, #41
Less spots to check.,
Tac,
10-Jun-09 01:16 PM, #42
Yeah,
Rayihn,
10-Jun-09 02:08 PM, #44
RE: Yeah,
Tac,
10-Jun-09 03:13 PM, #48
Answer,
Abernyte,
11-Jun-09 04:31 AM, #68
Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed the dy...,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 02:05 PM, #43
RE: Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed th...,
Rayihn,
10-Jun-09 02:12 PM, #45
Adding to a players daily tedium txt,
Larcat,
10-Jun-09 02:30 PM, #46
Cosign. Its just tedious and boring now.,
Dervish,
10-Jun-09 03:29 PM, #49
RE: Because you've (the IMMstaff) completely changed th...,
Not An Imm,
10-Jun-09 05:04 PM, #50
Kids hunt for easter eggs,
Mekantos,
10-Jun-09 05:19 PM, #51
DRRRRRRRRRRAMA. (n/t),
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 05:30 PM, #52
Ah, screw it.,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 05:34 PM, #53
It's not so bad,
Valkenar,
10-Jun-09 05:56 PM, #54
DRRRRRRRRRRAMA.,
Dallevian,
10-Jun-09 06:00 PM, #55
I don't see how I'm in category #3?,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 08:13 PM, #58
It's just a muddle.,
Adhelard,
10-Jun-09 08:38 PM, #61
Short response:,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 09:31 PM, #65
Ah gotcha. I fall into the same 'trap' from time to ti...,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 09:39 PM, #66
RE: Ah, screw it.,
Eskelian,
10-Jun-09 08:34 PM, #60
The contest is there for a reason,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 08:53 PM, #62
RE: The contest is there for a reason,
Turing,
10-Jun-09 09:01 PM, #63
Big Ups to Zulgh here txt,
Larcat,
10-Jun-09 09:26 PM, #64
RE: The contest is there for a reason,
Zulghinlour,
10-Jun-09 09:45 PM, #67
RE: The contest is there for a reason,
Jhishesh,
13-Jun-09 02:26 PM, #70
RE: The contest is there for a reason,
Eskelian,
13-Jun-09 10:34 AM, #69
When you piss people off enough,
Mekantos,
10-Jun-09 07:17 PM, #56
One thing, there is hardly any warriors in the Fort.,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 08:07 PM, #57
I kinda get the gist of what you are saying here...,
TMNS,
10-Jun-09 08:16 PM, #59
The old spots were also plausible.. read please.,
Guilo,
10-Jun-09 02:38 PM, #47
Mages aren't supposed to be like melee,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 12:34 PM, #9
Ok, but.,
Dallevian,
09-Jun-09 12:37 PM, #11
That's just how it is.,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 04:32 PM, #14
Tell me.,
Dallevian,
09-Jun-09 04:59 PM, #16
RE: Tell me.,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 05:17 PM, #17
Probably,
Dwoggurd,
09-Jun-09 05:35 PM, #18
RE: Probably,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 06:15 PM, #21
Well,
Dwoggurd,
09-Jun-09 06:29 PM #22
RE: Probably,
Isildur,
09-Jun-09 11:52 PM, #27
RE: Probably,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 12:38 AM, #29
But,
Dwoggurd,
10-Jun-09 07:35 AM, #31
RE: But,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 11:10 AM, #40
And?,
Dwoggurd,
10-Jun-09 07:27 AM, #30
RE: And?,
Isildur,
10-Jun-09 09:09 AM, #32
That's because.,
Dallevian,
10-Jun-09 10:27 AM, #35
RE: That's because.,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 10:33 AM, #36
RE: Tell me.,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 05:40 PM, #19
RE: Tell me.,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 06:10 PM, #20
Re,
Dwoggurd,
09-Jun-09 06:33 PM, #23
RE: Tell me.,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 06:57 PM, #24
RE: Tell me.,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 09:43 PM, #25
RE: Tell me.,
Valkenar,
09-Jun-09 11:51 PM, #26
RE: Tell me.,
Daevryn,
10-Jun-09 12:34 AM, #28
RE: Tell me.,
Valkenar,
10-Jun-09 09:32 AM, #33
Yeah cause a svirf warrior can't do that,
Guilo,
09-Jun-09 03:45 PM, #13
RE: The New Wand Locations,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 09:34 AM, #1
This, to me at least, begs the question....,
Tac,
09-Jun-09 09:58 AM, #2
So why not make it a bit easier?,
Guilo,
09-Jun-09 10:04 AM, #3
But that blows.,
Dallevian,
09-Jun-09 10:21 AM, #4
I really think some overhaul change is needed.,
Guilo,
09-Jun-09 10:49 AM, #5
There was just a giant discussion about this,
Daevryn,
09-Jun-09 10:57 AM, #6
You beat me to that...,
Dragomir,
09-Jun-09 11:00 AM, #7
Yeah but there was no solution,
Guilo,
09-Jun-09 12:13 PM, #8
Like I just posted above, I agree,
Dallevian,
09-Jun-09 12:34 PM, #10
| |
|
