Subject: "RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23417
Show all folders

IsildurFri 16-Jan-09 09:18 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#23429, "RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt"


          

It would be simpler if, instead of having practice work with actual percentages, there were just "blocks".

23+ INT = 75% in 1 prac. Tweak down subsequent improvement rate for 23-INT characters ever so slightly to keep them balanced.

16-22 INT = 75% in 2 pracs. Tweak down subsequent improvement rate for 16-INT characters ever so slightly to keep them balanced.

15 or below = 75% in 3 pracs.

  
Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicFourth Attack [View all] , Valkenar, Thu 15-Jan-09 06:21 PM
Reply RE: Fourth Attack, Dark Priest, 15-Jan-09 06:35 PM, #2
Reply 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int, Linolaques, 15-Jan-09 06:32 PM, #1
     Reply RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int, Isildur, 15-Jan-09 07:12 PM, #3
     Reply RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int, Linolaques, 15-Jan-09 07:22 PM, #4
          Reply I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt, DurNominator, 16-Jan-09 03:09 AM, #5
               Reply RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt, Daevryn, 16-Jan-09 08:51 AM, #6
                    Reply RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt, Isildur, 16-Jan-09 09:18 AM #7
                    Reply Confused..., Twist, 16-Jan-09 12:23 PM, #9
                    Reply RE: Confused..., Isildur, 16-Jan-09 02:52 PM, #11
                         Reply So you're saying..., Twist, 16-Jan-09 04:37 PM, #12
                              Reply Why not?, Splntrd, 16-Jan-09 04:55 PM, #13
                              Reply RE: Why not?, Valkenar, 16-Jan-09 05:01 PM, #14
                                   Reply RE: Why not?, AsidMonk, 16-Jan-09 11:08 PM, #17
                              Reply RE: So you're saying..., Isildur, 16-Jan-09 05:19 PM, #15
                              Reply RE: So you're saying..., AsidMonk, 16-Jan-09 11:06 PM, #16
                              Reply Ya, but..., Stunna, 17-Jan-09 01:23 PM, #20
                              Reply correction, Elerosse, 17-Jan-09 02:03 AM, #18
                    Reply That's just a plain bad idea., DurNominator, 17-Jan-09 06:09 AM, #19
                    Reply If I were you, Dwoggurd, 16-Jan-09 02:23 PM, #10
     Reply RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int, Valkenar, 16-Jan-09 12:03 PM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23417 Previous topic | Next topic