|
Linolaques | Thu 15-Jan-09 07:22 PM |
Member since 25th Sep 2006
63 posts
|     |
|
#23422, "RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int"
|
It's only one practice and in most cases you won't have anything to do with it, so this is obviously a tiny issue.
However, I wouldn't consider it a 4% advantage, because you will go from 71-80% much more quickly than you will from 96-100%
Still, I usually don't have much problem perfecting it quickly with high-int characters. YMMV.
|
|
|
 Fourth Attack
[View all] , Valkenar, Thu 15-Jan-09 06:21 PM
  RE: Fourth Attack,
Dark Priest,
15-Jan-09 06:35 PM, #2
 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int,
Linolaques,
15-Jan-09 06:32 PM, #1
RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int,
Isildur,
15-Jan-09 07:12 PM, #3
 RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int,
Linolaques,
15-Jan-09 07:22 PM #4
I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt,
DurNominator,
16-Jan-09 03:09 AM, #5
RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt,
Daevryn,
16-Jan-09 08:51 AM, #6
RE: I'd put only one prac for anything with 23 int. nt,
Isildur,
16-Jan-09 09:18 AM, #7
Confused...,
Twist ,
16-Jan-09 12:23 PM, #9
RE: Confused...,
Isildur,
16-Jan-09 02:52 PM, #11
So you're saying...,
Twist,
16-Jan-09 04:37 PM, #12
Why not?,
Splntrd,
16-Jan-09 04:55 PM, #13
RE: Why not?,
Valkenar,
16-Jan-09 05:01 PM, #14
RE: Why not?,
AsidMonk,
16-Jan-09 11:08 PM, #17
RE: So you're saying...,
Isildur,
16-Jan-09 05:19 PM, #15
RE: So you're saying...,
AsidMonk,
16-Jan-09 11:06 PM, #16
Ya, but...,
Stunna,
17-Jan-09 01:23 PM, #20
correction,
Elerosse,
17-Jan-09 02:03 AM, #18
That's just a plain bad idea.,
DurNominator,
17-Jan-09 06:09 AM, #19
If I were you,
Dwoggurd,
16-Jan-09 02:23 PM, #10
RE: 1 prac v 2 pracs for 23 int,
Valkenar,
16-Jan-09 12:03 PM, #8
| |
|
