Doge | Fri 22-Jun-07 11:15 AM |
Member since 02nd Apr 2003
117 posts
| |
|
#18161, "RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheating?"
|
I still say the solution to this problem is to give mages these spells in their spell lists and tie them with a hefty per tick mana drain. You could keep the wands as is. These would not have this mana drain and could maybe offer longer durations. Problem solved. You have an incentive to explore and playing field is leveled.
|
|
|
Does the current wand system encourage more cheating?
[View all] , jasmin, Thu 21-Jun-07 12:36 PM
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Rade,
02-Aug-07 11:34 AM, #71
No, for I don't bother to make a list of wands that mig...,
DurNominator,
27-Jun-07 11:39 PM, #36
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Doge,
22-Jun-07 11:15 AM #11
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Gabe,
22-Jun-07 08:12 PM, #20
Heh, in the last RS incarnation,
Tac,
25-Jun-07 08:26 AM, #29
I'm not sure what the point is, but this is a lie. nt,
Nightshade,
25-Jun-07 10:32 AM, #30
RE: Does the current wand system encourage more cheatin...,
Zulghinlour,
21-Jun-07 01:09 PM, #1
A little spoon for the newbies,
Mekantos,
21-Jun-07 02:07 PM, #2
Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
astaroth,
22-Jun-07 02:04 AM, #3
I hear you,
Torak,
22-Jun-07 05:37 PM, #17
RE: I hear you,
incognito,
24-Jun-07 03:48 PM, #24
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
24-Jun-07 10:35 PM, #28
RE: I hear you,
Isildur,
24-Jun-07 04:51 PM, #26
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
24-Jun-07 10:33 PM, #27
RE: I hear you,
Thrakburzug,
26-Jun-07 12:53 PM, #32
RE: I hear you,
Torak,
27-Jun-07 10:31 PM, #34
Your posts are almost not worth reading.,
vargal,
27-Jun-07 11:16 PM, #35
RE: Your posts are almost not worth reading.,
Gromkonk,
28-Jun-07 05:18 AM, #40
As Enarn's #1 Lackey...,
Aodh,
26-Jun-07 06:55 PM, #33
Khar,
Kastellyn,
29-Jun-07 12:23 PM, #56
RE: I hear you,
Karel,
04-Jul-07 01:32 AM, #69
RE: Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
incognito,
24-Jun-07 03:49 PM, #25
RE: Sleeks have been an endless source of frustration,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 12:20 AM, #37
RE: A little spoon for the newbies,
Rade,
29-Jul-07 03:55 PM, #70
and here it is.,
Odrirg,
22-Jun-07 07:35 AM, #4
I couldn't have said it better myself. nt,
Vladamir,
22-Jun-07 07:42 AM, #5
Sleek Wand Finding,
Twist,
22-Jun-07 08:36 AM, #7
Nepenthe-ism must be contagious. ~,
_Magus_,
22-Jun-07 06:09 PM, #19
Yup. Tedium is so 1994.,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 10:31 AM, #8
RE: Yup. Tedium is so 1994.,
Isildur,
22-Jun-07 02:34 PM, #14
I don't have to play mages,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 04:04 PM, #16
RE: and here it is.,
Zulghinlour,
22-Jun-07 02:12 PM, #13
Quick question,
_Magus_,
23-Jun-07 07:15 PM, #22
RE: Quick question,
Zulghinlour,
23-Jun-07 11:00 PM, #23
RE: and here it is.,
Sandello,
25-Jun-07 03:09 PM, #31
What I don't like.,
Vladamir,
22-Jun-07 07:52 AM, #6
A few points/opinions,
Gromkonk,
22-Jun-07 10:40 AM, #9
RE: A few points/opinions,
Kastellyn,
22-Jun-07 11:07 AM, #10
An idea,
Valkenar,
22-Jun-07 12:16 PM, #12
RE: An idea,
Isildur,
22-Jun-07 02:37 PM, #15
Yeah!,
Gromkonk,
22-Jun-07 05:41 PM, #18
I like these ideas a lot.,
Vladamir,
23-Jun-07 11:44 AM, #21
RE: I like these ideas a lot.,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 12:29 AM, #38
Eh.,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 12:50 AM, #39
So which is this?,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 10:38 AM, #41
You don't get it.,
vargal,
28-Jun-07 11:47 AM, #42
RE: You don't get it.,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 02:44 PM, #44
Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Twist,
28-Jun-07 03:48 PM, #47
No offense (+vargal response),
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 04:26 PM, #49
RE: Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 10:33 AM, #52
Keep in mind that 2/1 wasn't a ratio...,
Twist,
29-Jun-07 11:37 AM, #53
RE: Keep in mind that 2/1 wasn't a ratio...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 01:21 PM, #59
RE: Kharia had one aura wand that I knew of...,
Adhelard,
29-Jun-07 12:10 PM, #55
Fine, replace Hunsobo with "Any Village Berserker". n/...,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 01:15 PM, #58
Well, I disagree,
Valkenar,
29-Jun-07 03:54 PM, #60
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 04:32 PM, #61
RE: Well, I disagree,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 04:42 PM, #62
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 07:32 PM, #63
RE: Well, I disagree,
Torak,
29-Jun-07 09:26 PM, #64
RE: Well, I disagree,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 10:55 PM, #65
But, there I'm already getting off the point...,
Daevryn,
29-Jun-07 10:59 PM, #66
That's true,
Valkenar,
30-Jun-07 12:55 PM, #67
RE: Well, I disagree,
Eskelian,
02-Jul-07 12:06 PM, #68
RE: So which is this?,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 02:41 PM, #43
RE: So which is this?,
Eskelian,
28-Jun-07 02:51 PM, #45
RE: So which is this?,
Daevryn,
28-Jun-07 03:07 PM, #46
RE: So which is this?,
Eskelian,
29-Jun-07 10:22 AM, #51
I endorse this post. n/t,
Sandello,
29-Jun-07 12:02 PM, #54
Some feeback,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 04:11 PM, #48
oops,
Valkenar,
28-Jun-07 10:37 PM, #50
Suggestion for an addition to the current system.,
Sandello,
29-Jun-07 12:42 PM, #57
| |
|