Subject: "Wield/Dual Wield" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #17035
Show all folders

AstillianTue 13-Mar-07 06:33 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
166 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM Click to send message via ICQ
#17035, "Wield/Dual Wield"


          

The premise:

8222tnl(53.02%)2 AM wield pickaxe
A two-headed pickaxe with tips of diamond is too light to wield while dual wielding a sword of honor.
A wildcat is writhing in agony.

8222tnl(53.02%)2 AM disem
You must wield an axe in your primary hand to disembowel your opponent.
A wildcat dodges your wrath.
Your slash maims a wildcat!
A wildcat dodges your wrath.
A wildcat dodges your wrath.
A wildcat dodges your slash.
You parry a wildcat's claw.
A wildcat's claw MASSACRES you!
You sure are BLEEDING!
PANIC! You couldn't escape!
A wildcat is writhing in agony.

This wield seems wrong. I would like to see it so that no matter what you wield, it will go into that wield spot and remove whatever is in your dual wield if it's not compatable. Realistically if you want to wield an axe that's lighter why hold on to that heavier sword in the offhand.

Is this something that was overlooked? Purposely kept in? Or just not possible to do? Or none of the above?



  
Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicWield/Dual Wield [View all] , Astillian, Tue 13-Mar-07 06:33 PM
Reply Created a poll...so vote if you want it changed, Zulghinlour, 14-Mar-07 10:43 PM, #4
Reply RE: Wield/Dual Wield, Zulghinlour, 13-Mar-07 09:37 PM, #1
     Reply -f --force?, Tac, 13-Mar-07 09:46 PM, #2
          Reply Yay Unix people!, TheDude, 13-Mar-07 09:52 PM, #3
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #17035 Previous topic | Next topic