laxman | Tue 13-Nov-07 11:40 AM |
Member since 18th Aug 2003
1867 posts
| |
|
#92, "does the immortal staff use a system of continual improvement?"
|
I mean seriously the game has been around for a decade plus. Do you guys have a system of continual improvement where your re-examining your business processes and striving to remove the waste? This means looking at things from a value added stand-point. And this does not mean your viewpoint as the administrator, it means our viewpoint as the customer. Not to steal your thunder but why after so many years is it still such a long process to do anything in this game?
If you want to improve the quality of cf something to look at is the lead times associated with implementation. Now I am sure you will flip around and say that there is no possible way to improve them but thats everyones first response (and 99.9999999999999% of the time the wrong one). Perhaps you should consider having a third party review some of your processes. Not saying you need to divulge trade secrets but there might be some things you can do to make this game better for us the player and you the immortal.
|
|
|
A Proposal
[View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Why I would be against this.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:45 AM, #45
As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy...,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
RE: The question from me!,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
RE: The question from me!,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #44
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
Without going into specifics.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Not I.,
Valguarnera,
08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
RE: Not I.,
Tahren,
08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
Another angle,
Mekantos,
08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
I think you're missing the point.,
Cyradia,
12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
RE: Why areas?,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
Thank you for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 01:12 AM, #37
Think systemic:,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
RE: Think systemic:,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
RE: Think systemic:,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
RE: Think systemic:,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt,
DurNominator,
14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Daevryn,
13-Nov-07 09:01 AM, #9
Thanks for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 11:40 AM #10
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:05 PM, #20
Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT,
Dragomir,
13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
actually I major in OEM nt,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
Ninja society...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
I would love.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
There is a CF facebook group,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
No, thanks.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
RE: Ninja society...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
RE: Re: generalizations,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
RE: Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
Good Post,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
RE: generalizations,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
Well, there goes me assuming again..,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
That's not the problem...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
One idea I really like...,
Gryshilniar,
13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
RE: Not I.,
colospgsbryan,
08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
| |
|