DurNominator | Fri 15-Apr-05 12:34 PM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#719, "RE: Relative vrs. absolute morality"
|
>So Chucky Manson is good because he says he is?
According to Chucky Manson, this is so. The real question is: Do you trust Chucky Manson to make this evaluation of good and evil for you? Labeling someone with alignment is rather artificial, and should be regarded with suspicion in real world. In the case of Chucky Manson we may think along the lines: Chucky Manson kills people. Killing people is evil, and since Chucky Manson kills people, he is evil. This definition I can live with, since the reason is given why Chucky is evil.
But if I point my finger at you and simply declare "Alarian is evil!" is something that should be regarded with suspicion. If this declaration is taken as truth, then anything could be done to punish you for being evil. The real question is: Why would I declare you evil? If others just take my word for it and you are put to death in electric chair or something, just because I declared you evil. I'm not actually declaring you evil, though.
This is entirely different matter in real world as it is in CF, which I think was your main point. So, basically, you should consider the reasons why someone is deemed as evil before agreeing with the one doing the declaration and ponder whether you agree with him or not.
>This is the central, fatal flaw of relative morality, IMHO. If >the only thing you judge are judgements and standards, they >cease to exist when these things are the 2 basics by which all >morality is determined. Relative morality is oxymoronic >because the former undermines the latter.
In CF, this is accurate, but in real world, I wouldn't claim that there are clearly two basics that define which actions are evil and which are good. There are many factors that influence in such moral decicions in real life. There simply aren't people who are inherently good or evil in real life.
|
|
|
Paladins
[View all] , Vandir, Tue 12-Apr-05 05:07 PM
The Paladin Code,
Aarn,
21-Apr-05 02:24 PM, #42
My approach,
Innis,
21-Apr-05 01:30 PM, #41
RE: Paladins,
Zulghinlour,
19-Apr-05 04:39 PM, #32
Agreed,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 06:59 AM, #34
RE: Agreed,
Grurk Muouk,
20-Apr-05 11:35 AM, #37
The thing is, Grurk has a red aura,
Theerkla,
20-Apr-05 11:53 AM, #38
Whatever works for your char's role.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:48 PM, #39
Here's how I did it as a mortal.,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 07:17 PM, #30
RE: Paladins,
nepenthe,
12-Apr-05 05:36 PM, #1
On that note...,
Aarn,
12-Apr-05 06:34 PM, #2
Well, as someone that tries,
incognito,
12-Apr-05 06:45 PM, #3
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 07:58 AM, #4
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Rodriguez,
13-Apr-05 11:14 AM, #5
RE: Well, as someone that tries,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 11:41 AM, #6
So I could say, Rape a nine year old Florida girl, and ...,
(NOT Pro),
13-Apr-05 05:10 PM, #7
I hate you for this post, but,
Wilhath,
13-Apr-05 05:40 PM, #8
his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
incognito,
13-Apr-05 09:36 PM, #10
RE: his arguments are not mutually exclusive,
Wilhath,
14-Apr-05 04:02 PM, #12
Not quite,
Aarn,
13-Apr-05 06:02 PM, #9
It's a different world.,
DurNominator,
14-Apr-05 02:15 PM, #11
Relative vrs. absolute morality,
Alarian,
15-Apr-05 08:41 AM, #13
I hope you get a religion.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:15 PM, #14
RE: Relative vrs. absolute morality,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 12:34 PM #15
Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 12:54 PM, #16
RE: Relative Morality, Real world vs. Game world,
nepenthe,
15-Apr-05 01:03 PM, #18
sorry for getting off-subject,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 01:20 PM, #19
Whoa,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:02 PM, #20
Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 02:12 PM, #21
RE: Also, to bring it back to Paladins...,
A2,
19-Apr-05 04:19 PM, #31
No.,
Odrirg,
19-Apr-05 04:56 PM, #33
RE: No.,
A2,
20-Apr-05 11:30 AM, #36
You're both right.,
Alarian,
20-Apr-05 01:56 PM, #40
Paladins shouldn't associate with evil.,
DurNominator,
20-Apr-05 10:35 AM, #35
You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 12:58 PM, #17
RE: You are bass akwards. In a big way.,
Aarn,
15-Apr-05 02:31 PM, #22
If we bring this back to CF.,
DurNominator,
15-Apr-05 03:18 PM, #23
This, I agree with. somewhat.,
Odrirg,
15-Apr-05 03:52 PM, #24
Me too. That's not anathema to what he's saying though.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:36 PM, #26
That works too.,
DurNominator,
16-Apr-05 12:41 AM, #28
Heh,. Okay. We agree.,
(NOT Pro),
15-Apr-05 06:35 PM, #25
Is this about right?,
Vandir,
15-Apr-05 08:18 PM, #27
I love stuff like this.....,
Alarian,
17-Apr-05 06:59 PM, #29
| |
|