>Which part of chaos do you disagree with, the
>unpredictability or the anti-order?


Part of that is being unpredictable,
Partly, though chaos can also be achieved by being predictable, it just depends as to what part you are playing in the big puzzle.

but chaos is anti-order as well.
Chaos is chaos, not anti-anything.


Chaos isn't just do whatever you want whenever you feel like it.
You just stated that you consider unpredictability to be chaotic, so what's changed?


If you are ... a tool to enhance order, you can expect me to get upset.
I didn't understand how a chaotic killing a chaotic can be considering enhancing order, since surely there may have been some confusion to the orderly.


Chaos is chaos but players are mere mortals, they cannot truly exist in the chaotic world, they are influenced by this sphere and direct events towards a destabilisation or use chaos magicks or something towards the furtherance of chaos.
Obviously my view on things has been heavily tainted by Warhammer chaos and i consider that warbands of Orcs can bring about Chaos. There is order and leadership but in the end, a greater state of Chaos is brought about by Orderly actions.


Similarly i can't help contrast your comments with very old entropy to find an altogether more restrictive view of chaos. Hence why i ask, must i realign my views of Chaos or is there still rampant opportunity? i.e. i'd be extremely miffed by comment had i been playing that chaotic character (whom i've never met nor knowing anything of)