Subject: "FWIW" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #136280
Show all folders

TwistTue 19-Feb-19 09:36 AM
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#136296, "FWIW"


          


>240 is not a magical number. People used that number because
>that is when Twist handed in the quest for Tavlin (*), but we
>got that wrong too because base chance is not when you hand it
>in but when you accept the quest.
>
>* and obviously with access to the code behind the mummy quest
>Twist would maximise his chances


Just as an FYI, I don't have access to the code. I can ask questions of coders as to how things work, but I try to only do that when I'm wondering about game balance type things - not for how the mummy quest works. If I were to ask about something like the mummy quest, it would be in a case like this, where a character seems like they should have had a higher base chance and didn't.

As an example, I've tried 3 times to Lich and failed all 3 times.

I am, however, wondering about your base chance. It seems to me at one point that I did ask about base chances (wayyy back in the day) and for some reason I feel like someone told me a low number was better. Like having a base chance of 20 meant 80% chance of success. I'm probably remembering completely wrong, though.

I will tell you this - if I knew whether 20 was good or bad (you're probably right that it is bad, I just have that nagging memory) I would absolutely tell you.

I'll also say this - if 20 is bad, and I knew WHY your char had a 20 chance, I'd absolutely tell you. Some guesses as to what might factor in that you haven't mentioned:
1. PKW v. Good
2. PK Deaths
3. ImmXP

As for Tavlin - If you look at my spells list, I didn't perfect each spell. Not even each "necro-specific" spell. You can see by looking at my timeline and leveling history that I hit 47 at 210 hours and then 20 hours later began the quest at 230. I'm trying to remember, but I think I probably hit a pkwin threshhold at 41 and once I was past that did some powerleveling to 47. Then I may have done some pking at that level to hit another pkwin threshhold (back when pkwins at certain levels mattered for edgepoints).

However, I seem to recall getting absolutely wrecked for about a week straight by Fort when I was at level 47, so I probably said "OK screw this I'm going for mummy because 47 human necro is no fun at all."

From the PBF:
May 14, 2011|Lv 47|Domain of Eternal Night|vs 2: Werthius (71%, divine power), Gurzgred (28%)
May 14, 2011|Lv 47|Fortress of Light|vs 2: Dakaeh (47%, crush), Werthius (52%)
May 14, 2011|Lv 47|Sands of Sorrow|vs 1: Forodaugh (100%, searing light)
May 15, 2011|Lv 47|The Aryth Ocean|vs 1: Gryilious (100%, slash)
May 17, 2011|Lv 47|Sands of Sorrow|vs 1: Vonzamir (100%, bite)
May 19, 2011|Lv 47|Domain of Eternal Night|vs 3: Bachguer (27%, beating), Nevaelle (7%), Gurzgred (64%)

Unfortunately the PKWins section of the PBF is cut off beyond level 43 for Tavlin, but I'm pretty sure during that week I had very few pkwins.

So - sorry for making anyone think 240 (or 230, when I began) was a magic number. Maybe it is, but I chose it because I was tired of getting schooled at 47.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT Topic(AGE DEATH) [TRIBUNAL] Karchammadel the Spectre [View all] , Death_Angel, Mon 18-Feb-19 07:36 AM
Reply RE: (AGE DEATH) [TRIBUNAL] Karchammadel the Spectre, Llyion (Anonymous), 21-Feb-19 09:41 PM, #34
Reply you used up all your luck in not dying, Dallevian, 19-Feb-19 01:54 PM, #16
Reply Not to mention, incognito, 21-Feb-19 08:00 AM, #33
Reply have you tried not losing?, Jhyrbian, 19-Feb-19 12:17 PM, #14
Reply RE: (AGE DEATH) [TRIBUNAL] Karchammadel the Spectre, Karchammadel (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 08:21 AM, #2
Reply RE: (AGE DEATH) [TRIBUNAL] Karchammadel the Spectre, Ishuli, 18-Feb-19 12:13 PM, #3
Reply Thanks, Karchammadel (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 04:05 PM, #5
Reply 20 base seems low, Bemused, 19-Feb-19 02:24 AM, #8
     Reply RE: 20 base seems low, scr, 19-Feb-19 07:52 AM, #11
     Reply RE: 20 base seems low, Ishuli, 19-Feb-19 05:21 PM, #20
          Reply RE: 20 base seems low, Bemused, 19-Feb-19 05:28 PM, #21
          Reply RE: 20 base seems low, Ishuli, 19-Feb-19 06:53 PM, #23
          Reply Becoming, Saagkri, 20-Feb-19 05:10 AM, #26
               Reply Because it may not have the desired effect, incognito, 20-Feb-19 08:03 AM, #28
                    Reply What you're describing..., Saagkri, 20-Feb-19 08:25 AM, #29
Reply Look in the mirror when you talk about griefing , Someone special (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 02:26 PM, #4
Reply Looked in the mirror, saw a handsome guy smiling back, Karchammadel (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 04:08 PM, #6
Reply RE: (AGE DEATH) [TRIBUNAL] Karchammadel the Spectre, Noirra (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 07:50 PM, #7
Reply Isn't it 240 hours?, Kstatida, 19-Feb-19 04:07 AM, #9
     Reply Nope, Bemused, 19-Feb-19 04:40 AM, #10
          Reply I can see at least 3 things on your pbf, incognito, 19-Feb-19 08:47 AM, #12
          Reply FWIW, Twist, 19-Feb-19 09:36 AM #13
               Reply These factors were on my list, incognito, 19-Feb-19 01:32 PM, #15
               Reply That's probably what I was remembering, Twist, 19-Feb-19 02:07 PM, #17
               Reply There is no code, Zanitjah (Anonymous), 19-Feb-19 04:00 PM, #18
                    Reply RE: There is no code, Ishuli, 19-Feb-19 05:17 PM, #19
                    Reply RE: There is no code, Zanitjah (Anonymous), 19-Feb-19 06:49 PM, #22
                    Reply The base can be modified by an imm, incognito, 20-Feb-19 02:29 AM, #24
                    Reply :) now ..., ExExplorer, 20-Feb-19 03:03 AM, #25
                    Reply RE: There is no code, Saagkri, 20-Feb-19 05:21 AM, #27
                         Reply Clarification., Ishuli, 20-Feb-19 09:22 AM, #30
                              Reply Got it. Thanks! n/t, Saagkri, 20-Feb-19 11:14 AM, #31
                    Reply RE: There is no code, robdarken_, 20-Feb-19 03:07 PM, #32
Reply God damnit., Zaralv (Anonymous), 18-Feb-19 07:49 AM, #1
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #136280 Previous topic | Next topic