Subject: "RE: (DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #20679
Show all folders

LaearristMon 25-Aug-03 06:59 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
289 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#20688, "RE: (DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General"


          

I left a goodbye note IC, so I don't feel anything is neccessary here except my OOC thoughts on the character...

Striking the Shadow's Footfall: Never noticed a difference even when I was getting the anticipating every move message. Would have tested it more, but well it doesn't work against mobs, so thats tough.

Pole Spec: Blah... Why bother. Do more damage and tank better as a sword spec. Charge is weak (weaker than doublethrust), charge set is damn near impossible to practice now (unless I was doing something wrong when I tried), distance isn't as good as flourintine (though I thought it was supposed to be especially good for giants), legsweep is pretty useless, but cutoff worked pretty well... even though I don't think it ever got better than 75%, ohh and entrap is cool.

Hand Spec: Loved it.


Warriors = not my style

Had fun, laters.

Laearrist

P.S. 50% ratio = 3 wins 3 losses, wow was I busy

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Topic(DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General [View all] , Death_Angel, Sun 24-Aug-03 10:40 PM
Reply RE: (DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General, Laearrist, 25-Aug-03 06:59 PM #1
     Reply you gotta be kidding me!, incognito, 26-Aug-03 03:09 AM, #2
     Reply RE: you gotta be kidding me!, Laearrist, 26-Aug-03 03:53 PM, #3
     Reply RE: (DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General, Kozlaski (Guest), 27-Aug-03 09:12 AM, #4
     Reply RE: (DELETED) [NEXUS] Juzequol the General, Kucerael (Guest), 27-Aug-03 06:36 PM, #5
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #20679 Previous topic | Next topic