Subject: "I would have to agree" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Announcements Topic #1441
Show all folders

AbernyteMon 11-Aug-08 05:37 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
973 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#1552, "I would have to agree"


          

With dual back stab a thing of the past the multiplier for back stab on a sleeping opponent should be resurrected.

Noone worries about it anymore. Most every back stab, unless I have them bound and gagged, result in c 'word or flee;get potion girdle;quaff teleport/recall. If it had a bit more punch it might be worth using. As it is you are often better off with knife and then trip.

-----Abernyte

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicCouple changes to backstab. [View all] , Valguarnera, Sun 13-Apr-08 01:38 PM
Reply Question, Abernyte, 08-Aug-08 01:28 PM, #12
Reply Having checked the code:, Valguarnera, 12-Aug-08 02:19 PM, #14
Reply Made some similar changes to Charge., Valguarnera, 04-May-08 04:01 PM, #11
Reply RE: Couple changes to backstab., Narissa, 20-Apr-08 11:45 AM, #10
Reply While we're at it..., Marcus_, 17-Apr-08 06:36 PM, #9
Reply I would have to agree, Abernyte, 13-Aug-08 06:03 AM #13
Reply RE: Couple changes to backstab., Tac, 13-Apr-08 08:27 PM, #4
Reply Whoops. I'll fix that post ., Valguarnera, 13-Apr-08 09:17 PM, #5
     Reply Valg makes a typo. Rumors begin., Mekantos, 13-Apr-08 09:48 PM, #6
     Reply RE: Whoops. I'll fix that post ., Pargtorix, 15-Apr-08 12:32 AM, #7
          Reply Not opposed to it., Valguarnera, 15-Apr-08 12:46 AM, #8
Reply Do I read this right?, Quixotic, 13-Apr-08 08:27 PM, #2
Reply Awesome., GinGa, 13-Apr-08 05:55 PM, #1
     Reply Don't forget, Mekantos, 13-Apr-08 08:27 PM, #3
Top General Discussions Announcements Topic #1441 Previous topic | Next topic