Subject: "RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Events & Contests Topic #926
Show all folders

DaevrynWed 31-Jan-07 02:49 PM
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#947, "RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy."


          


>Out of curiosity, along what lines would yours be?

(Incidentally, that's not necessarily a bad thing.)

I think I've touched on a lot of the stuff I'd have had in... I think I also probably would have gone along the line of, here's some things that all warriors are good at... and here's some examples of kinds of warriors that would be good at specific things. I mean, you can build a warrior who's a really good tank or is hard to kill. You can build a warrior who just throws a lot of damage. You can build a warrior with a ton of maledictive power. You can build a warrior who's great at getting weapons out of people's hands one way or another. Etc., all depending on the choices you make. I'm not sure how to bring those kinds of tradeoffs and options into general enough terms that MUD newbies could understand them, but that's some of the idea.

>I considered that but chose to go the way I did because it
>seemed in other write-ups, including yours for invokers, you
>used a lot of actual skill names, which were click-able to go
>directly to the helpfile. So, I emulated that format and
>tried to use the actual names of warrior skills rather than
>characterize them. I understand why you might make the change
>you suggest, but query whether there is more benefit to the
>newbie by hearing and being able to look up the specific
>skill, rather than just hear a bit of what it does here. It's
>probably a 51/49 proposition either way.

This might be a do as I say not as I do thing. I can admit that possibility.

One thing I think we have to be conscious of is people reading this who don't know the basics of why certain things are good. In retrospect, I did this somewhat with the invoker writeup draft that's up... i.e., sure you can freeze your surroundings with conglaciation, but why do I care?

In the context of this, for example, do I care if I can break someone's bones or make them bleed? Why is that good? Or, why is it better than something else that sounds good? We all know this stuff and take it for granted.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicUpgrade the Web Page! Step 1: Class pages: [View all] , Valguarnera, Tue 21-Apr-09 08:38 AM
Reply Here's a stab at rangers., (NOT Graatch), 25-Feb-07 09:36 PM, #54
Reply Good base work, my iteration of this piece., DurNominator, 26-Feb-07 11:31 PM, #56
Reply Shapeshifter File, Verakh (Guest), 24-Feb-07 02:31 PM, #51
Reply BTW:, Daevryn, 22-Feb-07 01:19 PM, #47
Reply Can we still submit stuff?, Tac, 22-Feb-07 01:44 PM, #48
     Reply Absolutely. (nt/), Daevryn, 22-Feb-07 01:45 PM, #49
Reply Prize Summary!, Valguarnera, 09-Feb-07 10:19 PM, #38
Reply Yay! txt, LarrcatLazy (Guest), 10-Feb-07 12:25 AM, #39
Reply Done!, Valguarnera, 10-Feb-07 12:29 AM, #40
     Reply RE: Done!, Vershelt (Anonymous), 10-Feb-07 09:02 AM, #41
          Reply Ditto nt, Tac, 10-Feb-07 11:31 AM, #42
Reply Hrm., DeathClaw-lazy (Guest), 13-Feb-07 11:40 AM, #43
Reply And yet another one --- Paladins, LarcatLazy (Guest), 09-Feb-07 08:50 PM, #37
Reply You said you wanted finished product on monday., graatchman (Guest), 07-Feb-07 03:35 PM, #35
Reply RE: You said you wanted finished product on monday., Valguarnera, 07-Feb-07 03:42 PM, #36
Reply And another one -- Shamans, Larcat, 03-Feb-07 05:07 PM, #33
Reply Revised draft warrior page., (NOT Graatch), 01-Feb-07 09:42 PM, #25
Reply I'd put in a bit more regarding lagging skills, hopeful..., elmeri_, 03-Feb-07 02:59 PM, #30
Reply RE: I'd put in a bit more regarding lagging skills, hop..., graatchman (Guest), 03-Feb-07 05:07 PM, #32
Reply I take it you didn't much care for the additions? n/t, Graatchman (Guest), 07-Feb-07 03:35 PM, #34
Reply Posted!, Daevryn, 13-Feb-07 01:13 AM, #44
     Reply RE: Posted!, (NOT Graatch), 13-Feb-07 11:40 AM, #45
     Reply RE: Posted!, Graatchman (Guest), 24-Feb-07 02:31 PM, #53
     Reply RE: Posted!, DC-Lazy (Guest), 26-Feb-07 11:31 PM, #57
Reply Sample Logs., Mek (Guest), 01-Feb-07 03:55 PM, #23
Reply This sounds like a really solid idea., elmeri_, 03-Feb-07 02:59 PM, #31
Reply Shapeshifters - Quick first draft, Tac, 01-Feb-07 12:01 PM, #22
Reply Couple things to add off the top of my head:, Daevryn, 01-Feb-07 12:10 PM, #58
     Reply RE: Couple things to add off the top of my head:, Verakh (Guest), 24-Feb-07 02:31 PM, #52
          Reply Some retouching of this, DurNominator, 25-Feb-07 09:36 PM, #55
Reply Conjurers, DC-Lazy (Guest), 31-Jan-07 03:54 PM, #18
Reply Assorted Commentary:, Daevryn, 31-Jan-07 04:44 PM, #19
Reply RE: Assorted Commentary:, DC-Lazy (Guest), 31-Jan-07 09:43 PM, #20
Reply Reworked this a bit and put it up, btw. (n/t), Daevryn, 23-Feb-07 11:34 AM, #50
Reply Has nothing to do with classes but..., Zulghinlour, 31-Jan-07 12:20 PM, #12
Reply Zulg rocks!, Sandello, 31-Jan-07 02:06 PM, #15
     Reply RE: Zulg rocks!, Daevryn, 31-Jan-07 02:50 PM, #17
          Reply Not to hijack the thread.., Lazy Vargal (Guest), 02-Feb-07 08:42 AM, #26
               Reply RE: Not to hijack the thread.., Daevryn, 02-Feb-07 08:43 AM, #27
                    Reply RE: Not to hijack the thread.., Marcus_, 02-Feb-07 02:18 PM, #28
                    Reply Just a heads up, TheDude, 02-Feb-07 02:18 PM, #29
Reply Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy., (NOT Graatch), 30-Jan-07 10:12 PM, #6
Reply This isn't really helpful..., Tac, 31-Jan-07 12:32 AM, #7
Reply RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy., Daevryn, 31-Jan-07 11:19 AM, #10
     Reply RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy., (NOT Graatch), 31-Jan-07 02:06 PM, #14
          Reply RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy., Daevryn, 31-Jan-07 02:49 PM #16
               Reply RE: Took a quick stab at a warrior page draft. Enjoy., (NOT Graatch), 01-Feb-07 04:28 PM, #24
Reply Money - Mouth - Orcs, Tac, 30-Jan-07 10:12 PM, #5
Reply RE: Money - Mouth - Orcs, Tac, 31-Jan-07 10:07 AM, #8
     Reply RE: Money - Mouth - Orcs, Daevryn, 31-Jan-07 10:51 AM, #9
          Reply Yea that's a good piece of writing..., Tac, 31-Jan-07 12:43 PM, #11
               Reply This is what I have... (might be a little long), Tac, 31-Jan-07 02:06 PM, #13
                    Reply Futzed with this more and put it up! (n/t), Daevryn, 20-Feb-07 09:27 PM, #46
Reply Larcat's submission (druids), Valguarnera, 30-Jan-07 06:24 PM, #3
Reply My commentary:, Daevryn, 30-Jan-07 07:15 PM, #4
Reply Awesome! Thanks! And..., Tac, 30-Jan-07 03:07 PM, #1
     Reply Sure. Also, prize news!, Valguarnera, 30-Jan-07 03:08 PM, #2
          Reply More prizes., Valguarnera, 01-Feb-07 11:17 AM, #21
Top General Discussions Events & Contests Topic #926 Previous topic | Next topic