Go back to previous topic
Forum Name Gameplay
Topic subjectIt’s just too open ended
Topic URLhttps://forums.carrionfields.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=6&topic_id=72212&mesg_id=72226
72226, It’s just too open ended
Posted by laxman on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
You said it in one of these posts, if you can’t make/define a vanilla entropist then you won’t get numbers because most characters are a flavor of vanilla. Or at least add real incentives to draw those players so the cabal can build a core because village needs more mages to hunt. I haven’t played village in years and every time I consider it I realize my only opponent is going to be empire and there just won’t be enough to fill most of my login time.


I also can’t tell how freedom and magic as goals relate to each other. Empire is the only other cabal that has dual goals on paper, but it only has one in practice (assimilate or die).


And seriously you made a mage only cabal and excluded one of the true mage classes(for freedom) but included the half mage AP that sucks and emprisons souls, and side stepped the enslavement of corpses from another.


Honestly I think the cabal makes more sense if you just push the freedom of the pursuit of magic and drop the reference to society(players can add that relationship personally). Then you have a clear cabal purpose. Of course that is masters and not entropy but entropy died in the first place because imms failed to define it properly and it became chaotic stupid.