71189, Hardly. In case you missed it.
Posted by Jormyr on Wed 31-Dec-69 07:00 PM
This change was actually much-discussed internally, and said changes came as a response to the (CONSTANTLY requested) change of removing empowerment as a requirement to priestly classes. Yes, I am aware of your response that any *real* priest will still "need" to be empowered, but in reality you don't have to be. Given the potential for priests to now simply exist without specific Immortal oversight, the classes were throttled back slightly in other ways.
It was also very clearly announced at the following post:
http://forums.carrionfields.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=6&topic_id=64650&mesg_id=64650&listing_type=search
And players wonder why we don't simply change the game for every Tom, ####, & Harry with a good idea. We're tired of having to meet our Imm! Make it so we don't need empowerment! (After long, long, long thinking otherwise, staff decides to go forward) WTF??? How dare you not let the six druids a year not change metal to armor??!?
|