>Not something I have access to at the moment. Like I said
>above, though, I'm not sure looking at "all the numbers" is
>the best way to gauge whether something is OP. If a class has
>a gimmick that works against newbies but hardly ever against
>anyone who knows what they're doing, is it really OP?

I don't think it is a gimmick that only works against newbies. Trip + cheapshot is, because flight is cheap and easy to get. I'm also not sure your competent goodies faced any competent assassins. Especially ones exploiting the issues I specifically called out as adding up to the overall problem.

2607	Tiiga	5	570	91%	380	0.667	37	14	0	half-drow	assassin	orderly	evil	none	9/21/2016	17	71	500	13	1.24	1.68
911	Gaspare	10	870	94%	269	0.309	16	14	0	lich	necromancer	orderly	evil	empire	3/13/2016	53	127	4800	1	1.62	1.69
1320	Jeede	7	660	83%	223	0.338	45	14	0	human	assassin	neutral	evil	scarab	9/22/2016	19	55	5800	9	1.31	1.44
1940	Nazarates	1	491	97%	202	0.411	6	2	0	human	assassin	orderly	evil	empire	12/26/2016	43	88	700	0	1.6	1.83
403	Cainasir	3	299	98%	179	0.599	4	4	0	human	assassin	orderly	evil	scarab	1/8/2016	23	44	900	2	1.1	1.5

This is clearly cherry picked, but for characters dying in 2016, 4 of the top 5 killers were assassins played by 3 different players, and the other was a Lich. If you want to pull some goodie stats from that time period and see how people matched up against competent assassins, I'm betting you get the opposite story. You have to, because they ran 90% ish ratios, so clearly they were killing more than just newbs. That's why I think the overall data set is more telling.